Epson printers are electronic theieves

Arthur Entlichwrote:
quote="Arthur Entlich"]Yellow tends to run out first on the tri, by a
small amount. Yellow tends to run out first on the tri, by a small
amount. [/quote:5015775afd]

Righto, thanks Art.

Wayne Sewell wrote:

On 10/12/2005 20:00:08 measekite wrote:


Frank wrote:


Jon wrote:


measekite wrote:


Frank wrote:


Wayne Sewell wrote:


On 10/12/2005 12:11:37 measekite wrote:


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060306040308030901020600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


*D**A BULL**** XCHANGE*


--------------060306040308030901020600--


Using MIME in a newsgroup is the true meaning of bull**** exchange.


I an the true meaning of sewerage. Frank


AND **** TOO


I only lurk here but I tend to agree with others assessment of you. I
see that every time someone post something you will go in and change
their post. What is that all about. Are you too limited that you can't
come up your own original posting. Or else you post in all caps
something that is totally meaningless and very obnoxious. Don't bother
to answer me cause I am going to take others advice and kill file you.
I just found out how to do that. I have had enough of your no help
answers and useless waste of my bandwidth. jon


Good idea. Everyone should kill file my stupid ass then I can only talk
to me. Frank



In all my years on usenet, I think this is the first time I have ever seen
someone edit text quoted from another poster. That's low, even for usenet. Of
course, I don't read anything but comp.os.vms. It may be more common in the
anarchy of the alt groups.

original text:


Good idea. Everyone should kill file his stupid ass then he can only talk
to himself. Frank



Well this is also the first and only time I've ever run into such
behavior. He changes others postings and pretends like nobody notices
that he's done it. To call this guy a jerk and a loser would be
complimenting him. He obviously has some really bad human relationship
problems. But in todays world he is able to openly vent his hostilities
and hide behind the cloak of the Internet. That's the mark of a real
coward.
Problem is, his disruptive behavior adds nothing to this ng other than
chaos.
Kill file works great. When I click on the ng is see maybe 50 messages.
Then it changes to 37 and I know that 13 messages from him have been
deleted. Great! Then the only way I ever see his sorry ass is when
somebody else has responded to his insanity.
Frank

Frank wrote:

Wayne Sewell wrote:


On 10/12/2005 20:00:08 measekite wrote:


Frank wrote:



Jon wrote:



measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:



Wayne Sewell wrote:



On 10/12/2005 12:11:37 measekite wrote:



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060306040308030901020600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



*D**A BULL**** XCHANGE*



--------------060306040308030901020600--



Using MIME in a newsgroup is the true meaning of bull****
exchange.



I an the true meaning of sewerage. Frank



AND **** TOO



I only lurk here but I tend to agree with others assessment of
you. I
see that every time someone post something you will go in and change
their post. What is that all about. Are you too limited that you
can't
come up your own original posting. Or else you post in all caps
something that is totally meaningless and very obnoxious. Don't
bother
to answer me cause I am going to take others advice and kill file
you. I just found out how to do that. I have had enough of your
no help
answers and useless waste of my bandwidth. jon



Good idea. Everyone should kill file my stupid ass then I can only
talk
to me. Frank




In all my years on usenet, I think this is the first time I have ever
seen
someone edit text quoted from another poster. That's low, even for
usenet. Of
course, I don't read anything but comp.os.vms. It may be more common
in the
anarchy of the alt groups.

original text:


Good idea. Everyone should kill file his stupid ass then he can
only talk
to himself. Frank




Well this is also the first and only time I've ever run into such
behavior. He changes others postings and pretends like nobody notices
that he's done it. To call me a jerk and a loser would be
complimenting me. I obviously have some really bad human relationship
problems. But in todays world I am able to openly vent my hostilities
and hide behind the cloak of the Internet. That's the mark of a real
coward.
Problem is, my disruptive behavior adds nothing to this ng other than
chaos.
Kill file does works great. I always find a way to answer and then lie
about it. When I click on the ng is see maybe 50 messages. Then it
changes to 37 and I know that 13 messages from him have been deleted
but I manage to see them indirectly and look forward to answering
them. Great! Then the only way I ever see his sorry ass is when
somebody else has responded to his insanity. I just said that.
Frank

TALKING TO YOURSELF AGAIN?

quote="Bob Headrick
they recirculate the ink uses for purges back into the supply.

They just gotta keep all the ink colours well and truely seperated to
do this.

Davy

"Davy" wrote in message
...
Davywrote:
[quote:9ef5402e41="Davy"][quote:9ef5402e41]quote
This discussion now brings up again that Epson will not honour a
warranty
claim if third party ink is used or can be proved to be used.


They don't wanna know if an exhanged printer goes the same way as the
first one - OEM inks was used on both printers.

And they told me the guarantee is not transfered to the exchanged one,
in other words if the exchanged one broke down that was it.

That is nonsense...at least in NA...if we exhanged a printer during the
warranty they unit sent out gets the remainder of the one year warranty...

Did you do something to make these people want to put you through that?
Unless the UK warranty is worded differently than NA, I'd say you got
"special treatment"...and that would explain why you're so vile towards
Epson...

Marky IN DA BUSINESS wrote:

"Davy" wrote in message
m...


Davywrote:


[quote:9ef5402e41="Davy"][quote:9ef5402e41]quote


This discussion now brings up again that Epson will not honour a


warranty


claim if third party ink is used or can be proved to be used.




They don't wanna know if an exhanged printer goes the same way as the
first one - OEM inks was used on both printers.

And they told me the guarantee is not transfered to the exchanged one,
in other words if the exchanged one broke down that was it.



That is nonsense...at least in NA...if we exhanged a printer during the
warranty they unit sent out gets the remainder of the one year warranty...

Did you do something to make these people want to put you through that?
Unless the UK warranty is worded differently than NA, I'd say you got
"special treatment"...and that would explain why you're so vile towards
Epson...

Markywrote:
quote="Marky"
That is nonsense...at least in NA...if we exhanged a printer during
the
warranty they unit sent out gets the remainder of the one year
warranty...

Sorry, stand by my guns here.

The printer went faulty I was given a exchanged unit in a brown box
with Epson security labels minus the inks, that would be a factory
referbished unit as I seem to understand from this NG.

When the replacement went faulty with OEM inks, I telephoned Epson UK
and they told me that the gaurantee is not transferable and that
there was no gaurantee on the replacement....!

At the time I ought to have gone straight to trading standards...!

They would not give me a reference number so that I could take it to
the local Epson Agent - This is fact not fiction Marky.

At the time I wanted to complain above and beyond Epson UK, they would
or could not provide any contact details to do this.

I repeat-:
The gaurantee on the original printer could not be transfered over to
the replacement printer, nor would they give a warrenty on it...!

I was lumbered with crap printers from a crap company.

Davy

Davy wrote:
Markywrote:
quote="Marky"
That is nonsense...at least in NA...if we exhanged a printer during
the warranty they unit sent out gets the remainder of the one year
warranty...

Sorry, stand by my guns here.

The printer went faulty I was given a exchanged unit in a brown box
with Epson security labels minus the inks, that would be a factory
referbished unit as I seem to understand from this NG.

When the replacement went faulty with OEM inks, I telephoned Epson UK
and they told me that the gaurantee is not transferable and that
there was no gaurantee on the replacement....!

At the time I ought to have gone straight to trading standards...!

They would not give me a reference number so that I could take it to
the local Epson Agent - This is fact not fiction Marky.

At the time I wanted to complain above and beyond Epson UK, they would
or could not provide any contact details to do this.

I repeat-:
The gaurantee on the original printer could not be transfered over to
the replacement printer, nor would they give a warrenty on it...!

I was lumbered with crap printers from a crap company.


Interestingly, I have a Sony Mp3 player that died after 4 months. Sony
fixed it (at least I got the same unit back in working order), but the
warranty is now 3 months on repairs.

Wait - after 3 months, the thing is still just 7 months old. What happenned
to the 2 year warranty that is required in the EU for consumer items - he
asks rhetorically ????

It seem that perhaps this is SOP for companies generally. ?

Dweeb.
Davy

quote="Dr. Dweeb
Interestingly, I have a Sony Mp3 player that died after 4 months.
Sony
fixed it (at least I got the same unit back in working order), but
the
warranty is now 3 months on repairs.

Wait - after 3 months, the thing is still just 7 months old.

It seem that perhaps this is SOP for companies generally. ?


Glad someone can see my POV

But Sony of all people I am surprised, if this is a 'Sony Service
Centre' I would check with Sony HQ..! The item should be covered by
Sony warrenty and not the Service Centre's which could be an entirely
different company from Sony.

Like I was suprised with Epson.... a company you can not call 'good'.

Davy

Davy wrote:
quote="Dr. Dweeb
Interestingly, I have a Sony Mp3 player that died after 4 months.
Sony fixed it (at least I got the same unit back in working order),
but the warranty is now 3 months on repairs.

Wait - after 3 months, the thing is still just 7 months old.

It seem that perhaps this is SOP for companies generally. ?


Glad someone can see my POV

But Sony of all people I am surprised, if this is a 'Sony Service
Centre' I would check with Sony HQ..! The item should be covered by
Sony warrenty and not the Service Centre's which could be an entirely
different company from Sony.


Unknown. It was Sony in Holland who fixed it. The Dixons guy said it was 3
mth warranty on repairs. I hope it keeps going forever and I never need to
find out the real story :-)

Dweeb

Like I was suprised with Epson.... a company you can not call 'good'.

Davy