If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
8400 vs 4700
So I discovered that for decent gaming and all around fast operation I am
going to buy either of the systems in the subject line. I was going to keep the cost down a bit with the 4700 but for a slight cost difference the 8400 looks like more of the power system. Now by gaming I mean the occasional Doom 3 or similar game and with system requirements being stiffer with new games it looks like power is the way to go. Can anyone offer first hand experience with the 4700 vs 8400 operation? Thanks! For the record, I was looking at the 8400 with 1 GB RAM and the 6800 video card. Regards, John O. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Had the same dilemma when looking and decided you get a lot more bang for
just a little more money with the 8400, better yet I was able top grab a 8400 3.2 with 1gig of ram, dual DVD burners, ATI vid card and other goodies at the Dell Outlet for around $450 and that was a month ago, you can probably do better now... "JJO" wrote in message .. . So I discovered that for decent gaming and all around fast operation I am going to buy either of the systems in the subject line. I was going to keep the cost down a bit with the 4700 but for a slight cost difference the 8400 looks like more of the power system. Now by gaming I mean the occasional Doom 3 or similar game and with system requirements being stiffer with new games it looks like power is the way to go. Can anyone offer first hand experience with the 4700 vs 8400 operation? Thanks! For the record, I was looking at the 8400 with 1 GB RAM and the 6800 video card. Regards, John O. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"JJO" wrote in message .. . So I discovered that for decent gaming and all around fast operation I am going to buy either of the systems in the subject line. I was going to keep the cost down a bit with the 4700 but for a slight cost difference the 8400 looks like more of the power system. Now by gaming I mean the occasional Doom 3 or similar game and with system requirements being stiffer with new games it looks like power is the way to go. Can anyone offer first hand experience with the 4700 vs 8400 operation? Thanks! For the record, I was looking at the 8400 with 1 GB RAM and the 6800 video card. Regards, John O. Even if you're only going to occasionally need those types of requirements, get the 8400. The games you'll occasionally want to play in the future will likely be even more system extensive. Stew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 4 May 2005 07:57:29 -0400, "JJO" wrote:
So I discovered that for decent gaming and all around fast operation I am going to buy either of the systems in the subject line. I was going to keep the cost down a bit with the 4700 but for a slight cost difference the 8400 looks like more of the power system. Now by gaming I mean the occasional Doom 3 or similar game and with system requirements being stiffer with new games it looks like power is the way to go. Can anyone offer first hand experience with the 4700 vs 8400 operation? Thanks! For the record, I was looking at the 8400 with 1 GB RAM and the 6800 video card. Regards, John O. John, I got a refurbished 8400 about a month ago and love it. I am an avid gamer (D3, HL2, Q3, UT2004) and get top notch performance out of my system. I got the GeForce 6800 GTO video card and I can play D3 at 1024X768, 4XAA, with Shadows On, and still get 60 FPS (the max you can get on D3). HL2 is much easier on the system so looks great also. I'd get the 8400 if I were you :-) Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all of the replies. I guess the gamer in me finally got to the
point where I am looking for decent performance. The 8400 it is...besides I finally have my wife convinced on the "need" for a speed system. Regards, John O. "JJO" wrote in message .. . So I discovered that for decent gaming and all around fast operation I am going to buy either of the systems in the subject line. I was going to keep the cost down a bit with the 4700 but for a slight cost difference the 8400 looks like more of the power system. Now by gaming I mean the occasional Doom 3 or similar game and with system requirements being stiffer with new games it looks like power is the way to go. Can anyone offer first hand experience with the 4700 vs 8400 operation? Thanks! For the record, I was looking at the 8400 with 1 GB RAM and the 6800 video card. Regards, John O. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
JJO wrote:
Thanks for all of the replies. I guess the gamer in me finally got to the point where I am looking for decent performance. The 8400 it is...besides I finally have my wife convinced on the "need" for a speed system. Back in high school (1968), I convinced my mother that *she* needed a Pontiac GTO... A day, to this day, that she'll always regret! g Notan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 04 May 2005 20:39:35 -0600, Notan wrote:
JJO wrote: Thanks for all of the replies. I guess the gamer in me finally got to the point where I am looking for decent performance. The 8400 it is...besides I finally have my wife convinced on the "need" for a speed system. Back in high school (1968), I convinced my mother that *she* needed a Pontiac GTO... A day, to this day, that she'll always regret! g Notan LOL! But I bet that was a sweet ride! Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
It's possible that the imminent introduction of dual-core CPUs, which will
cover Dell's top of the line and eventually the entire line, will push the single-core CPUs of the current high-end Dells onto the discount rack. The dual-core CPUs run at a slightly lower clock than the corresponding single-core CPUs. For the most part, the step to dual-core will be a win, but when the focus is on a single thread (such as in current popular games), the winner may be the faster single-core. (Not to mention a powerful graphics processor.) Of course, in this business, whatever you buy will shortly be obsolete, and there's not a thing to be done about it. But it's useful to keep your eyes open, so as to be aware of when the significant changes are coming down the pipes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Aren't the Power Edge SC420's the same as the 8400's?
You can get one of those quit a bit cheaper last time I checked |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Bababooey" wrote in message m... Aren't the Power Edge SC420's the same as the 8400's? You can get one of those quit a bit cheaper last time I checked I've not been able to verify that the PowerEdge SC420 has a PCIexpress graphics slot to this point. If someone here has a 420, it would be nice to know. The PE 400SC was nearly identical to the Dimension 8300, all the way down to the 8x AGP slot. Stew |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dimen. 8400 vs. 4700, More bang for the buck? | Pinger | Dell Computers | 7 | March 14th 05 03:30 PM |
REQUEST OF TECHNICAL SERVICES ON RESOURCE DISK 8400 vs. 8300 | Chopperdad | Dell Computers | 3 | March 14th 05 05:07 AM |
Wrong Max BTU figure on Dell 8400 details page... | User N | Dell Computers | 2 | February 9th 05 03:22 PM |
Dell 4700 vs 8400 | Chuck | Dell Computers | 5 | February 9th 05 07:40 AM |
Heat Dissipation Specs - Dimension 8400 vs 4700; Also: Which is Quieter? | Don Enderton | Dell Computers | 2 | November 21st 04 12:51 AM |