Wireless Computer Monitor - Monitor's video connection is wireless

Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

On Oct 16, 1:31 am, karthikbalaguru
wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

I just did a quick search on Google and I found a website that offers
wireless VGA and wireless HDMI transmission boxes. This should do what
you are looking for.

http://www.ramelectronics.net/html/PC-TV_video.html

Keith
http://www.doubleblackdesign.com

husterk wrote:
On Oct 16, 1:31 am, karthikbalaguru
wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

I just did a quick search on Google and I found a website that offers
wireless VGA and wireless HDMI transmission boxes. This should do what
you are looking for.

http://www.ramelectronics.net/html/PC-TV_video.html

I have tried the Wireless PC to TV/Stereo before and was thoroughly
unimpressed with the range of the unit. I tried it for work but whether
the old building or too many walls but I couldn't get a clear picture
from it at only 20 feet away.



Keith
http://www.doubleblackdesign.com



--
Jethro[AGHL] aka Phat_Jethro
Reply Email: jethro86 (at) gmail (dot) com

In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia karthikbalaguru wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.

Arno

Arno Wagner wrote:
In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia karthikbalaguru wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.

Hmm, you better tell these guys it won't work:

http://plextor.com/english/products/PX-PA15AW.htm
http://addlogix.com/peripheral_sharing/echoview.htm

Marc

In article , Arno Wagner wrote:
In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia karthikbalaguru
wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.

Arno
Wrong!, the CEA is already working on a standard for Wireless HDMI for HDTV's
and the like.

'Arno' wrote:
| Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.
_____
Does exist.

The wireless monitor connections do not use 802.11 x standards equipment.
The bandwidth thus does not have the same limitation.

Phil Weldon

"Arno Wagner" wrote in message
...
| In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia karthikbalaguru
wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
| video connection is wireless) ?
|
| Thx in advans,
| Karthik Balaguru
|
| Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.
|
| Arno

In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia Marc Ramsey wrote:
Arno Wagner wrote:
In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia karthikbalaguru wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know about a good Wireless computer monitor (Monitor's
video connection is wireless) ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru

Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.

Hmm, you better tell these guys it won't work:

http://plextor.com/english/products/PX-PA15AW.htm
http://addlogix.com/peripheral_sharing/echoview.htm

Marc

As to this and the other replays: If you are satisfied with slow
changes and basically no possibility to display movies, or other
faster animated contents then of course solutions exist. These things
are rather limited. Their primary focus is for presentations that
mostly consist of static and/or low-details lides. A seconday use if
dor a remote console for system administration of systems that do not
have reasonable log-in possibilities. I tested one of these and it
feels jerky and slow. Not usable to work with for a longer duration.

Example: 1280x1024@60Hz with 24 bit color requires 3*1280*1024*60
Bytes = 230MB/s to be transferred for losless video
transfer. Compression can not solve that for all content. Also this
will require roughly 2.3GHz Bandwidth (!) to transfer
wirelessly. Currently, there is no large enough available space in the
RF spectrum for this.

Arno

In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia Phil Weldon wrote:
'Arno' wrote:
| Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.
_____
Does exist.

The wireless monitor connections do not use 802.11 x standards equipment.
The bandwidth thus does not have the same limitation.

It still needs several GHz of RF spectrum. Which happens to not be
available. There is no way to beat Shannon.

Arno

'Arno Wagner' wrote:
| It still needs several GHz of RF spectrum. Which happens to not be
| available. There is no way to beat Shannon.


Your assumptions turn out not to be true. See
http://www.analog.com/en/press/0,289...F72455,00.html

the abstract at
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/lo...number=1598300

and the Wireless Telegraphy (Ultra-Wideband Equipment) (Exemption)
Regulations 2007 (No. 2084) at [Ofcom (UK)]
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/cond...ion/statement/ .

Though compression does not 'beat Shannon', it IS the basis of getting HDTV
over the airwaves (and very soon to be the ONLY way to get TV over the
airwaves in most countries.)

Phil Weldon





"Arno Wagner" wrote in message
...
| In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia Phil Weldon
wrote:
| 'Arno' wrote:
| | Does not exist. The bandwidth needed is far, far too high.
| _____
| Does exist.
|
| The wireless monitor connections do not use 802.11 x standards
equipment.
| The bandwidth thus does not have the same limitation.
|
| It still needs several GHz of RF spectrum. Which happens to not be
| available. There is no way to beat Shannon.
|
| Arno