If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked.
I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? Hate to go from the frying pan into the fire. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
Kodak wants you to buy their paper ink combos to save money. The ink does not get as good a mileage as they want you to believe. The printer is about average but better than Lexmark. It lags somewhat behind Epson and way behind Canon. In all you spend a little less but get way less than Canon.
But it is a better choice than the idiots make when they use an Epson or Canon with the crappy fly by nite aftermarket 10th party ink facimile. theChas. wrote: The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked. I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? Hate to go from the frying pan into the fire. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
"theChas." wrote in message .. . The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked. I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? Hate to go from the frying pan into the fire. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Ignore the following post from measekite!. the Diarrhea that falls from his mouth is not to be believed. as He does not even own a Kodak and just blathers away to make himself feel important. Yes, I have a Kodak 5300 and am glad I bought it instead of the other 3 or 4 popular brands, The carts here in Canada cost me 10.00 for black and 15.00 for color, or a combo pack for 23.00, MUCH much cheaper than the others. The print results are as good as Canon or Epson in my view, I also have a canon and HP which have been put in the attic since I purchased the Kodak. You might like to go to a dealer and have them do a print of one of your photos , this will then tell you firsthand if it meets your expectations. As for myself I do recommend this printer, Would I buy again? YES. regards, Rene |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
Rene Lamontagne wrote: "theChas." wrote in message .. . The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked. I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? Hate to go from the frying pan into the fire. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Ignore the following post from measekite!. the Diarrhea that falls from his mouth is not to be believed. as He does not even own a Kodak and just blathers away to make himself feel important. Ignore this post from la la monte. the Diarrhea that falls from his mouth is not to be believed. Check out all of the reviews from all of the magazines. Yes, I have a Kodak 5300 and am glad I bought it instead of the other 3 or 4 popular brands, The carts here in Canada cost me 10.00 for black and 15.00 for color, or a combo pack for 23.00, MUCH much cheaper than the others. The ink does not go as far. When one color of a multi color goes out the rest is thrown away. Kodak cannot compare to Canon. The print results are as good as Canon or Epson in my view, Maybe in his view but not in the view of any professional review. I also have a canon and HP which have been put in the attic since I purchased the Kodak. You might like to go to a dealer and have them do a print of one of your photos , this will then tell you firsthand if it meets your expectations. Not true. Have them do a half dozen 8.5x11 of various photos that display a plethora of various colors and see for your self. As for myself I do recommend this printer, Would I buy again? YES. First it is not a printer. It is a multifunction device. Many people had trouble with their scanner. Epson makes the best scanner. Canon makes the best standard format dye based printer. No ifs ands or buts. He or her is mistaken. regards, Rene |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
"measekite" wrote in message et... Rene Lamontagne wrote: "theChas." wrote in message .. . The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked. I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? SNIP, a whole pile of garbage. I won't even lower myself to answer measekites drivel. Regards, Rene |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
I have looked at this and its bigger brother. Kodak has several options
offered in terms of consumables. They sell each cartridge separately, they sell them as a set black and color (it uses two ganged cartridges), and they sell the cartridges with 4x6 photo paper, if you are making smaller prints, that's the best deal, I believe. The inks are pigment and supposed to be long lasting. The build of the 3in1 printer looked pretty nice. The demo model I looked at showed banding in the prints, but that might just be an abused or not properly maintained unit. I have seen other output which was not banding. The main problem I saw was the color rendition. The images had a bit too garish a look for my liking. The subject of the demo images were all oversaturated making it hard to know if it was the source material or the drivers and profiles or the inks. The parrot image for instance, looked way oversaturated. I would suggest either seeing if you can find a store which will allow you to demo an image you know well, or if not ask for print samples from Kodak and try to decide from them if the color works for you. Art theChas. wrote: The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked. I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? Hate to go from the frying pan into the fire. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
Arthur Entlich wrote:
The main problem I saw was the color rendition. The images had a bit too garish a look for my liking. The subject of the demo images were all oversaturated making it hard to know if it was the source material or the drivers and profiles or the inks. The parrot image for instance, looked way oversaturated. The thought that leaped into my mind was, "Oh, that's just that classic 'Kodachrome Look.'" It's a Kodak tradition -- that somewhat over-saturated color density that Kodachrome has been famous for -- which makes it wonderful for use on overcast days. And my immediate question, then, is whether the color saturation can be turned down in the driver. And also, can it be muted in photocopy controls. If these adjustments can be made easily, and if they'll be retained nicely, the printer will be civilized. What do you think, Arthur? Richard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
Hi Richard,
I used Kodachrome 25, 64 and 200 for years and the one thing I can say for it is the originals, kept in dark storage don't seem to have lost any of their color in 20-30 years. Not as lucky with the Agfa slide films, although the E-6 Fuji and Kodak are still OK, but I think somewhat faded. Unfortunately, I don't know if the saturation can be adjusted, as I didn't get to play with the unit. I imagine there is some saturation adjustment in the driver adjustments, but how the ink and paper respond to lower saturation is hard to know without samples. Art Richard Steinfeld wrote: Arthur Entlich wrote: The main problem I saw was the color rendition. The images had a bit too garish a look for my liking. The subject of the demo images were all oversaturated making it hard to know if it was the source material or the drivers and profiles or the inks. The parrot image for instance, looked way oversaturated. The thought that leaped into my mind was, "Oh, that's just that classic 'Kodachrome Look.'" It's a Kodak tradition -- that somewhat over-saturated color density that Kodachrome has been famous for -- which makes it wonderful for use on overcast days. And my immediate question, then, is whether the color saturation can be turned down in the driver. And also, can it be muted in photocopy controls. If these adjustments can be made easily, and if they'll be retained nicely, the printer will be civilized. What do you think, Arthur? Richard |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
Rene Lamontagne wrote: "measekite" wrote in message et... Rene Lamontagne wrote: "theChas." wrote in message .. . The $37 price of HP cartridges has me ticked. I saw on TV where Kodak had a sell session, where they claimed one of their printers had about the cheapest ink cartridges. Does anyone here have knowledge, or tales, about the Kodak EasyShare 5300, '3 in 1' printer? SNIP, a whole pile of garbage. snip, a whole pile of garbage What was SNIPPED Ignore this post from la la monte. the Diarrhea that falls from his mouth is not to be believed. Check out all of the reviews from all of the magazines. Yes, I have a Kodak 5300 and am glad I bought it instead of the other 3 or 4 popular brands, The carts here in Canada cost me 10.00 for black and 15.00 for color, or a combo pack for 23.00, MUCH much cheaper than the others. The ink does not go as far. When one color of a multi color goes out the rest is thrown away. Kodak cannot compare to Canon. The print results are as good as Canon or Epson in my view, Maybe in his view but not in the view of any professional review. I also have a canon and HP which have been put in the attic since I purchased the Kodak. You might like to go to a dealer and have them do a print of one of your photos , this will then tell you firsthand if it meets your expectations. Not true. Have them do a half dozen 8.5x11 of various photos that display a plethora of various colors and see for your self. As for myself I do recommend this printer, Would I buy again? YES. First it is not a printer. It is a multifunction device. Many people had trouble with their scanner. Epson makes the best scanner. Canon makes the best standard format dye based printer. No ifs ands or buts. He or her is mistaken. Regards, Rene |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
New Kodak Printer questions
Arthur Entlich wrote: Hi Richard, I used Kodachrome 25, 64 and 200 for years and the one thing I can say for it is the originals, kept in dark storage don't seem to have lost any of their color in 20-30 years. That is totally false. I have slides of both a number of Kodachrome and Ektachrome snaps that have been stored in a cool dark place. Some faded and some faired better. There appears to be no difference between Kodachrome or Ektachrome in that regard. K is warmer and E is cooler as it is stated by Kodak. Not as lucky with the Agfa slide films, although the E-6 Fuji and Kodak are still OK, but I think somewhat faded. Unfortunately, I don't know if the saturation can be adjusted, as I didn't get to play with the unit. I imagine there is some saturation adjustment in the driver adjustments, but how the ink and paper respond to lower saturation is hard to know without samples. Art Richard Steinfeld wrote: Arthur Entlich wrote: The main problem I saw was the color rendition. The images had a bit too garish a look for my liking. The subject of the demo images were all oversaturated making it hard to know if it was the source material or the drivers and profiles or the inks. The parrot image for instance, looked way oversaturated. The thought that leaped into my mind was, "Oh, that's just that classic 'Kodachrome Look.'" It's a Kodak tradition -- that somewhat over-saturated color density that Kodachrome has been famous for -- which makes it wonderful for use on overcast days. And my immediate question, then, is whether the color saturation can be turned down in the driver. And also, can it be muted in photocopy controls. If these adjustments can be made easily, and if they'll be retained nicely, the printer will be civilized. What do you think, Arthur? Richard |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak printer review | TJ | Printers | 3 | November 20th 07 12:49 AM |
Need Help to identification Kodak ektaprint printer | stewart allen | Printers | 1 | October 20th 04 04:01 PM |
Sorry....The printer is a Kodak XL 7700 | LMG | Printers | 0 | September 11th 04 07:02 PM |
WTD: Cheapest place for PPM 200 Kodak printer | ß Ø ® G | UK Computer Vendors | 0 | January 18th 04 08:12 PM |
Kodak Thermal Printer ID-300Se | Smiley | Printers | 3 | August 18th 03 04:13 AM |