If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
If it ain't broke, fix it!
Was: CANON: DESIGNED TO FAIL by a dishonest company
About my old failing Canon BJ-300, I wrote: It is not a 15 years old printer. It's a three weeks old printer! I've seen some Laserjet 4 printers print more in 3 weeks as mine in 14 years. Consequently, when the glitch goes away, it prints perfectly. I had to face one such planned glitch 8 years ago. (Cf. the little sponge in the purge unit.) Canon told me the printer was dead. After I pressured them into telling me how to fix their planned glitch, a 5 minute job got it working until now. Comparing a BJ-300 to the plastic ink dispensers that Canon sells nowadays does prove what kind of fuchhead you are. It's slow, it doesn't print color, but it still fits my needs. I wouldn't print in color even I had a color printer and I'm never in such a rush. Mickey answered: How sad you are but there is hope. Maturity comes with age and 21 is not too far away. 21 not too far away? Oh, this would be the nicest Christmas gift! Unfortunately for your reasoning, if I was one of those kids who's been taught ecology instead of how to use a screw driver, I probably would have declared my printer obsolete soon as it first stopped working in 1996. I suppose I got this attitude from one of my uncles, a mechanic who was still driving his 1947 Chrysler around 1980. Not only did he keep his car for more then 30 years before he sold it as a vintage car, but every time a part would fail, he would consider fixing it before buying a new one. Open the hood, take a look, consider: that was his attitude. I still own his mini-dryer. In twenty years, I only had to change a switch and a fan belt. My only regret is that, though the dryer will be 40 years old in 2005, I can't any money from it as a vintage dryer Are you aware that the HP LaserJet you mentioned is powered by a CANON printer engine. All LaserJets have used CANON print engines. "Have used." And now? What you're saying here just goes to prove my point. The BJ-300 is a work horse capable of delivering much more than the 12,000 sheets I got from it. And Loosenut Boogs may rest assured that the stainless steel shafts are not rusted, the rubber rollers are not degraded and no ink has spilled on the printed circuits. This printer was mechanically made to last. So what? It seems that at the time of manufacture, Canon decided at the last minute there was more money to be made with ink than printers. That's when the change occured, Soon thereafter, the new Bubblejets came out at around 200$. So they had a problem on their hands with this printer designed the good old way. There were no one picoliter, or whatever, drops at that time and any ink would do OK. So, they put a sponge in the purge unit that would at least eventually block the most off-the-plate non-Canon inks, in order to sell their 35$, 350 pages, cartridges. In other words, they ****ed up the ink distribution system. But because the printer had been costly to produce, they didn't lower the price. So, the customer -- me , in this case -- ended up with an expensive unreliable printer. What was HP's approach with the Deskjet 500 at the same time? As I already explained, it's one of the most rugged printer of all times, and it sold at about 50$ less than the BJ-300. Millions of pages must have gone through some of those printers. And the printhead being part of the cartridge, it couldn't clog. Of course, if was impossible, even less than now, to build a disposable printhead of as good quality as a permanent one. When you looked at a print made by a Deskjet, you could see minute droplets of ink around the letters. And, of course, every magazine would confirm this. So, I told myself, what was 50$ more to get better quality? Only later was I to discover that the difference in quality would cost so much more and so much pain in the ass. A friend of mine had a Deskjet and used to buy plain Carter's ink, which still sold in pharmacies at the time, and refilled her cartridges with a seringe for her drafts. "It must clog the head", I told her. "Of course, after 4 or 5 refills, it does, she answered. I then have another new empty cartridge ready to refill." With the help of magazines, who hardly ever test long-term reliability, I've been one of those Bozos who've been lured by Canon's so-called high-technology. Too bad there isn't a law to forbid printer companies to sell ink. The printers would certainly be more expensive, but the print would finally come down to a lot less, with much less trouble. Of course, I'm neither a printer, nor an industry specialist, and I couldn't tell how HP is behaving since La Fiorina took control or how Lexmarks does after IBM decided there was nothing to get out of it. But I know one thing for su Canon has spearheaded this /revolution/ were the customer has become the sucker. And I know that, to this day, Canon has refused to acknowledge they sold me a printer at yesterday's price with today's flaws. I know they went as far as refusing to provide the information I needed. I'm sure they still perfectly know about the flaw I'm experiencing today and are still refusing to provide the few words of support I need. I had only words of praise for Canon before I bought this printer. I still own a Canon FTB-QL 35 mm camera and, though I haven't used it for quite some time, it probably still works perfectly. But sometimes, companies change. They're headed by /more efficient/ administrators invertors learned to luv. As a customer, I don't peculiarly appreciate Canon's way of management. As a matter of fact, I now truly abhor this company. They might send as many trolls they want, whether I tell my story long or short, it will get more precise each and every time, and rest assured I'll get the message through. Money talks! In the meantime, the planet is dying and buying a Prius is really an indecent way of acquiring an ecologist status. "Cutting-edge technology", as Motor trend puts it, comes at an expense when repair time comes. So here's my advice for the New Year to every sensible citizen of this world. Stop preaching ecology, get a screwdriver and, if it's only a glitch, it ain't broke, fix it! GP |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Broke power supply pin | x | General | 8 | December 22nd 04 05:02 AM |
Inspiron 4100: Trackpoint broke. | jason | Dell Computers | 3 | September 21st 04 12:03 AM |
4.5 broke up videocard?! | Serge Yatsenko | Ati Videocards | 14 | May 30th 04 09:37 AM |
ATI 9700pro broke, wait till nextgen card? When do they come out? | Brook Harty | Ati Videocards | 3 | February 7th 04 08:21 PM |
Is my motherboard broke? | steve | General | 2 | November 5th 03 08:51 PM |