If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A7V600 - good upgrade choice?
Hi, Nforce2 chipset is a better proposition than the KT600. Try a NF7 for
starters.... Chris C "Ben Nealon" wrote in message ... Just another quick question that i missed, Does the onboards sound come with a game connector cable or must this be purchased seperately? I uanderstand there is no port on the I/O Panel! Regards, Ben Nealon "Ben Nealon" wrote in message ... Hi, I am currently looking at upgrading my computer system, i am looking at some new memory, cpu and motherboard. I am planning to get a better graphics card at a later date (christmas). for starters, is the ASUS A7v600 motherboard a good choice? I play quite a few performance hungry games (for example max payne 2 and soon half life 2) I am currently a student and obvioulsy cant afford much more than £70 tops for a mb [i like all the features of the A7v600 though, ie SATA usb2.0](i am upgrading from an athlon 1.4ghz with 256mb ddr ram.) I will be looing at the current setup: ASUS A7v600 Athlon thoroughbred xp 2700 (333mhz) 512mb (maybe 1Gb) pc3200 Ram old parts include: 300watt PSU 160gb ata133 7200rpm maxtor hdd ASUS Gforce 3 ti200 g card ....some other parts will be used, but are not necessary to put here... I have a few more questions to ask... Would you recommend purcahsing 512mb ram or 1gb? i want a good computer that will cope well with future releases, but i dont want any unneccesary spending. Is a 300W power supply good enough for this setup? or would you recommend 400w? My current motherboard has an onboard creative CT5880 sound chip (AC97 codec) - what is better, this one or the one found on the A7V600 MB Any further comments would be appreciated... Regards, Ben Nealon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have to say that I agree with the last response to a degree. The A7V600
has gotten some pretty sad reviews, albeit for the sole reason that certain bios features are missing such as locking of the AGP frequency and lack of certian voltage adjustments. These features are partucularly useful to folks who wish to overclock. Since the big deal about the A7V600 is the Via KT600 bios and it's ability to run up to the 400 mhz FSB, the fact that it's overclocking ability is stymied by certain features (or lack of) would seem to fly in the face of it's true purpose. After all, the whole premise of Athlon equipment is the promise of cheap speed. It's my understanding that there will be a Via KT800 (or some such) chipset coming dow the pike that will add a multitude of nifty features desgned to better compete against the Nforce 2 chipset. The A7V8X-X and the A7V600 are virtually identical in features (and appearance) ecxept for their chipsets and are, overall, good, inexpensive performers. The 8X-X runs about $70 US where the 600 runs about $90 US. All in all, good performers, but not the best performers. The Abit NF7 runs somewhere in between and uses the Nforce2 chipset and it's reviews mark it as stable and versitile. As a gammer, it might be more to your taste. As far as the PSU, you can try the 300W but if you find the system not booting or other strange behavior the larger PSU would be advised. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article oR7nb.28333$mZ5.134460@attbi_s54, Mike Gorman
writes I have to say that I agree with the last response to a degree. The A7V600 has gotten some pretty sad reviews, albeit for the sole reason that certain bios features are missing such as locking of the AGP frequency and lack of certian voltage adjustments. These features are partucularly useful to folks who wish to overclock. Since the big deal about the A7V600 is the Via KT600 bios and it's ability to run up to the 400 mhz FSB, the fact that it's overclocking ability is stymied by certain features (or lack of) would seem to fly in the face of it's true purpose. After all, the whole premise of Athlon equipment is the promise of cheap speed. While I'd have to agree on initial specs, having built up two systems now using this board and an XP2500 Barton, the lack of AGP lock isn't much of an issue since the board allows the multiplier to be changed and of course its unlocked on this chip. Buying good DDR400 (or faster) Ram should allow the FSB to be set at 420 or 440 and then you just set the multiplier to whatever the chip will allow. XP3200 performance should normally be achievable with the XP2500 chip. -- __________________________________________ Gareth Jones "Reality sucks - go watch a Star Trek" To email, remove the '_ns_' from __________________________________________ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Gareth Jones" wrote in message While I'd have to agree on initial specs, having built up two systems now using this board and an XP2500 Barton, the lack of AGP lock isn't much of an issue since the board allows the multiplier to be changed and of course its unlocked on this chip. Buying good DDR400 (or faster) Ram should allow the FSB to be set at 420 or 440 and then you just set the multiplier to whatever the chip will allow. XP3200 performance should normally be achievable with the XP2500 chip. That's good news because I'd really like to pick one of these up along with a 400fsb Barton chip. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article qAZpb.79236$275.224096@attbi_s53, Mike Gorman
writes now using this board and an XP2500 Barton, the lack of AGP lock isn't much of an issue since the board allows the multiplier to be changed and of course its unlocked on this chip. Buying good DDR400 (or faster) Ram should allow the FSB to be set at 420 or 440 and then you just set the multiplier to whatever the chip will allow. XP3200 performance should normally be achievable with the XP2500 chip. That's good news because I'd really like to pick one of these up along with a 400fsb Barton chip. Well my board works fine at 440 with Twinmos DDR400 RAM. However the point I was making is that you stand a very good chance of getting the much cheaper XP2500 barton (which is 333FSB) to actually run at these 400 speeds - so why would you buy a 400MHz FSB version at triple (?) the price? Overclocking is always a gamble - in that in a worst case scenario, you CAN'T overclock it at all and so it runs at stock speed, but with the 2500, this appears to be one of those 'classic' overclocking chips. I'm sure AMD have done this as a farewell present to all those loyal Athlon fans who made it such a popular chip over the years ;-) -- __________________________________________ Gareth Jones "Reality sucks - go watch a Star Trek" To email, remove the '_ns_' from __________________________________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Athlon64 upgrade help | XYZ | AMD x86-64 Processors | 5 | January 1st 05 08:02 PM |
Upgrade Report [Hardware Tips: Get the Right Hard Drive - 05/11/2004] | Ablang | General | 0 | May 16th 04 03:17 AM |
XP 64 2.8 - good choice? | ENJ483 | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | May 8th 04 06:44 PM |
Good AMD upgrade mobo? | grendel | General | 7 | July 17th 03 09:20 PM |
A7V8X-X a good choice? | Bill Rubin | Asus Motherboards | 5 | June 30th 03 03:53 PM |