A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Ati Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nvidia 5200 Go AGP 4X Vs 128MB ATI Radeon 9600 PRO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th 04, 10:07 AM
Sharp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nvidia 5200 Go AGP 4X Vs 128MB ATI Radeon 9600 PRO

Hi

Which video card should I get to run with my Centrino 1.6ghz processor?

64MB DDR nVidia® GeForceTM FX Go5200 Go AGP 4X

or

128MB ATI Radeon 9600 PRO


I was thinking that the bottleneck may be the 1.6ghz processor, so it
wouldn't make much difference upgrading to the 9600 pro graphics. Also, can
you EASILY overclock the Go5200 graphics to a similar speed, therefore
making upgrading to 9600 pro pointless?

Yes, I realise these a mobile graphics, but im considering this as part of
buying a notebook.

Cheers
Michael


  #2  
Old November 6th 04, 06:43 PM
Robert Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HAHA 5200 is the worst card and a mobile version will be utterly
terrible.... at least 9600 pro is respectable, for a notebook that is...

id say, without any fact sheets in front of me, the 9600 pro is 3 times
faster than the 5200 in games, though with the 9600 pro u cant play most new
games anyway

as with amd and pentium cpus, clock speed is not everything. if u oc the
5200 to 9600 pro speeds, it will still be much slower.
"Sharp" wrote in message
...
Hi

Which video card should I get to run with my Centrino 1.6ghz processor?

64MB DDR nVidia® GeForceTM FX Go5200 Go AGP 4X

or

128MB ATI Radeon 9600 PRO


I was thinking that the bottleneck may be the 1.6ghz processor, so it
wouldn't make much difference upgrading to the 9600 pro graphics. Also,
can
you EASILY overclock the Go5200 graphics to a similar speed, therefore
making upgrading to 9600 pro pointless?

Yes, I realise these a mobile graphics, but im considering this as part of
buying a notebook.

Cheers
Michael




  #3  
Old November 6th 04, 11:32 PM
Sharp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What games are you referring to?

Sharp


"Robert Jackson" wrote in message
...
HAHA 5200 is the worst card and a mobile version will be utterly
terrible.... at least 9600 pro is respectable, for a notebook that is...

id say, without any fact sheets in front of me, the 9600 pro is 3 times
faster than the 5200 in games, though with the 9600 pro u cant play most

new
games anyway

as with amd and pentium cpus, clock speed is not everything. if u oc the
5200 to 9600 pro speeds, it will still be much slower.
"Sharp" wrote in message
...
Hi

Which video card should I get to run with my Centrino 1.6ghz processor?

64MB DDR nVidia® GeForceTM FX Go5200 Go AGP 4X

or

128MB ATI Radeon 9600 PRO


I was thinking that the bottleneck may be the 1.6ghz processor, so it
wouldn't make much difference upgrading to the 9600 pro graphics. Also,
can
you EASILY overclock the Go5200 graphics to a similar speed, therefore
making upgrading to 9600 pro pointless?

Yes, I realise these a mobile graphics, but im considering this as part

of
buying a notebook.

Cheers
Michael






  #4  
Old November 7th 04, 12:49 PM
Martin Pick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert Jackson" wrote in message
...
HAHA 5200 is the worst card and a mobile version will be utterly
terrible.... at least 9600 pro is respectable, for a notebook that is...

id say, without any fact sheets in front of me, the 9600 pro is 3 times
faster than the 5200 in games, though with the 9600 pro u cant play most
new games anyway


that`s a bit misleading to say the least. 5200 and 9600 chipsets will run
all games available, the question is how fast? With a 5200 the answer is not
very. With a 9600 pro the answer is faster. Neither of these GPU`s are the
best out there but they are cheap. Both support enough features of DX9 to
make games look good. A 9600pro is much faster than a 5200 (i`ve had
both)and is a better bet than the 5200.


  #5  
Old November 8th 04, 02:09 AM
Robert Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

5200 can play games like doom 3, bf vietnam, and others, BUT it will be like
watching a slide show

9600 pro will be better but not optimal..
minimum these days is 9700pro
"Sharp" wrote in message
...
Hi

Which video card should I get to run with my Centrino 1.6ghz processor?

64MB DDR nVidia® GeForceTM FX Go5200 Go AGP 4X

or

128MB ATI Radeon 9600 PRO


I was thinking that the bottleneck may be the 1.6ghz processor, so it
wouldn't make much difference upgrading to the 9600 pro graphics. Also,
can
you EASILY overclock the Go5200 graphics to a similar speed, therefore
making upgrading to 9600 pro pointless?

Yes, I realise these a mobile graphics, but im considering this as part of
buying a notebook.

Cheers
Michael




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RADEON 9600 PRO TV OUT NIGHTMARE Paul Ati Videocards 1 April 2nd 04 04:48 AM
Powercolor Radeon 9600 pro EZ 128MB KRJ Ati Videocards 2 November 16th 03 11:45 PM
9600 256MB - Is the extra 128Mb justified? Terence Gui Ati Videocards 10 August 27th 03 01:53 AM
Which Radeon 9600 Pro to get Simon-Pierre Ati Videocards 2 August 5th 03 01:45 AM
nVidia 5600 Ultra v. ATI Radeon 9600 Christoph General 1 June 27th 03 07:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.