A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Selecting a DAT drive



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 06, 07:42 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Jonathan Sachs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Selecting a DAT drive

My DDS-3 tape drive (a Sony SDT-9000) is malfunctioning, and I think
it's time for me to upgrade to DDS-4 or DDS-5. If you've had
experience with this technology, please comment: which brand(s) would
be most reliable?

After a couple of decades of extremely good experience with DAT
technology, my relationship with DDS-3 has been unhappy. My original
HP drive failed spontaneously after about three years of use, and its
replacement died after a couple of months. I then swore off HP and
bought the Sony, which lasted a couple of years before it started
eating tapes. Thus, my concern for choosing something I can count on.
  #2  
Old August 20th 06, 10:31 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Arno Wagner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,796
Default Selecting a DAT drive

Previously Jonathan Sachs wrote:
My DDS-3 tape drive (a Sony SDT-9000) is malfunctioning, and I think
it's time for me to upgrade to DDS-4 or DDS-5. If you've had
experience with this technology, please comment: which brand(s) would
be most reliable?


After a couple of decades of extremely good experience with DAT
technology, my relationship with DDS-3 has been unhappy. My original
HP drive failed spontaneously after about three years of use, and its
replacement died after a couple of months. I then swore off HP and
bought the Sony, which lasted a couple of years before it started
eating tapes. Thus, my concern for choosing something I can count on.


Bets move away from DAT then. The revolving heads will allways cause
high wear and tear to the tapes and the themselves.

What media capacity are you looking for? How much capacity altogether?
Durability of indivicual media?

Arno
  #3  
Old August 20th 06, 01:42 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Jonathan Sachs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Selecting a DAT drive

On 20 Aug 2006 09:31:03 GMT, Arno Wagner wrote:

Best move away from DAT then. The revolving heads will allways cause
high wear and tear to the tapes and the themselves.


That was not my experience using DDS-2, DDS-1, and pre-DDS devices.
Are the more advanced versions of DDS less reliable? That seems
counterintuitive.

If I do abandon DAT, it's not clear to me what other options I have.
Before I bought the Sony drive I tried DLT technology, which was
supposed to be more reliable. I discovered the opposite. Maybe it is
reliable under data center conditions, but in a home with cats it
produced unrestorable backups several times a year.

Tape drives that use more advanced technologies appear to be very
expensive, as do the tapes. The price of admission would be $2k or
more, and I don't see how I can justify that for individual use.

What media capacity are you looking for?


My needs are somewhat elastic. At the moment I have no more than 13 GB
on any one drive, but any new client or personal project could change
that. My largest partition is 30 GB, but that is determined by the
estimated capacity of my backup media, rather than the other way
around. I do some audio restoration, which involves many 600 or 700 MB
WAV files , and I feel constrained by the number of projects I can
store on a DDS-3 tape. I think the best answer is that the more
capacity the media has the better an investment the drive will be --
provided it is reliable.

How much capacity altogether?


I don't understand the question. The whole point of backing up on tape
instead of a big disk is that total capacity can be increased
incrementally, without limit.

If it helps, I currently own about 3 dozen DDS-3 tapes, 18 of which
are in use.

Durability of indivicual media?


I typically write each backup tape between one and ten times, then
retain it for a year, during which I read it two or three times at
most. Then I reuse it. I expect these tapes to become obsolete before
they wear out, but I could live with limited media life if the media
were not too expensive.

For archival purposes I typically write once, read at most a few times
a year, and retain indefinitely.
  #4  
Old August 20th 06, 07:34 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Rod Speed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,559
Default Selecting a DAT drive

Jonathan Sachs wrote
Arno Wagner wrote


Best move away from DAT then. The revolving heads will allways
cause high wear and tear to the tapes and the themselves.


That was not my experience using DDS-2, DDS-1, and pre-DDS
devices. Are the more advanced versions of DDS less reliable?
That seems counterintuitive.


If I do abandon DAT, it's not clear to me what other options I have.


All tape formats are WAY past their useby date
now for the backup of personal desktop systems.

Before I bought the Sony drive I tried DLT technology, which was
supposed to be more reliable. I discovered the opposite. Maybe
it is reliable under data center conditions, but in a home with cats
it produced unrestorable backups several times a year.


Tape drives that use more advanced technologies appear to be very
expensive, as do the tapes. The price of admission would be $2k or
more, and I don't see how I can justify that for individual use.


Yep, you should be using hard drives, vastly cheaper.

What media capacity are you looking for?


My needs are somewhat elastic. At the moment I have no more
than 13 GB on any one drive, but any new client or personal
project could change that. My largest partition is 30 GB, but that
is determined by the estimated capacity of my backup media,
rather than the other way around. I do some audio restoration,
which involves many 600 or 700 MB WAV files , and I feel
constrained by the number of projects I can store on a DDS-3
tape. I think the best answer is that the more capacity the media
has the better an investment the drive will be -- provided it is reliable.


Yep, the only way to go is hard drives.

A couple of 120G+ eSATA hard drives is the only way to go.

How much capacity altogether?


I don't understand the question.


He means the total capacity of all the tapes involved in your media sets.

The whole point of backing up on tape instead of a big disk is
that total capacity can be increased incrementally, without limit.


Thats completely academic in your case, even a pair of 300G drives
gives you plenty of future and you can add another pair if you ever
run out of capacity, for a total cost of much less than DDSanything.

If it helps, I currently own about 3 dozen
DDS-3 tapes, 18 of which are in use.


Yeah, that's what he meant.

Durability of indivicual media?


I typically write each backup tape between one and ten times,
then retain it for a year, during which I read it two or three times
at most. Then I reuse it. I expect these tapes to become
obsolete before they wear out, but I could live with limited
media life if the media were not too expensive.


No need for that farting around with non tapes.

For archival purposes I typically write once, read
at most a few times a year, and retain indefinitely.



  #5  
Old August 21st 06, 12:27 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Jonathan Sachs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Selecting a DAT drive

I'm not going to respond to Rod's post, except to point out that he's
answering a question I didn't ask. I have plenty of reasons for using
tape which I'm not going to go into here (I have done so in the past,
if anyone cares to rummage through archives).

I requested information about the reliability of various brands of two
specific types of devices. To make this discussion useful, please,
let's limit the discussion to those topics.
  #6  
Old August 21st 06, 12:54 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Rod Speed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,559
Default Selecting a DAT drive

Jonathan Sachs wrote

I'm not going to respond to Rod's post, except to
point out that he's answering a question I didn't ask.


The question you asked is the wrong question.

I have plenty of reasons for using tape


No you dont.

which I'm not going to go into here (I have done so in
the past, if anyone cares to rummage through archives).


They were duds then, and remain duds now.

I requested information about the reliability of various brands
of two specific types of devices. To make this discussion
useful, please, let's limit the discussion to those topics.


Taint gunna happen, because everyone with a clue has noticed that tapes
are WAY past their useby date for personal desktop systems now.

THATS why you cant buy what you want, the entire market has noticed.


  #7  
Old August 21st 06, 01:10 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Michael L. Squires
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Selecting a DAT drive

My experience with DLT drives, all surplus, has been much better than
my experience with DAT drives, some of the new.

I am currently using two ADIC VLS DLT 7000 changers (7 slots, 1 DLT 70000
35/70GB drive) which cost $150 each on eBay, plus a standalone Compaq DLT
7000. I haven't used these for long, having just switched over from an
ADIC VLS DLT 4000 changer and two stand-alone DLT 4000 drives which have
been 100%.

My expereince with ADIC VLS changers (several DLT 2000XT, several DLT 4000,
and now the two DLT 7000's) is that if they work on arrival, they seem
to work nearly forever.

I'm also using a 300GB Seagate IDE drive to store dumps, but I also need
to archive.

(We have two cats.)

Mike Squires
UNIX(tm) at home
since 1986
  #8  
Old August 21st 06, 02:13 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Arno Wagner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,796
Default Selecting a DAT drive

Previously Jonathan Sachs wrote:
On 20 Aug 2006 09:31:03 GMT, Arno Wagner wrote:


Best move away from DAT then. The revolving heads will allways cause
high wear and tear to the tapes and the themselves.


That was not my experience using DDS-2, DDS-1, and pre-DDS devices.
Are the more advanced versions of DDS less reliable? That seems
counterintuitive.


I have seen several of these wear out in about a year, with daily
backups.

If I do abandon DAT, it's not clear to me what other options I have.
Before I bought the Sony drive I tried DLT technology, which was
supposed to be more reliable. I discovered the opposite. Maybe it is
reliable under data center conditions, but in a home with cats it
produced unrestorable backups several times a year.


Hmm.

Tape drives that use more advanced technologies appear to be very
expensive, as do the tapes. The price of admission would be $2k or
more, and I don't see how I can justify that for individual use.


What media capacity are you looking for?


My needs are somewhat elastic. At the moment I have no more than 13 GB
on any one drive, but any new client or personal project could change
that. My largest partition is 30 GB, but that is determined by the
estimated capacity of my backup media, rather than the other way
around. I do some audio restoration, which involves many 600 or 700 MB
WAV files , and I feel constrained by the number of projects I can
store on a DDS-3 tape. I think the best answer is that the more
capacity the media has the better an investment the drive will be --
provided it is reliable.


MOD is out then. That is what I use.

How much capacity altogether?


I don't understand the question. The whole point of backing up on tape
instead of a big disk is that total capacity can be increased
incrementally, without limit.


If it helps, I currently own about 3 dozen DDS-3 tapes, 18 of which
are in use.


It is an economic question. If you need lots of space you can invest
more in the drive if the media are cheaper as a consequence.

Durability of indivicual media?


I typically write each backup tape between one and ten times, then
retain it for a year, during which I read it two or three times at
most. Then I reuse it. I expect these tapes to become obsolete before
they wear out, but I could live with limited media life if the media
were not too expensive.


For archival purposes I typically write once, read at most a few times
a year, and retain indefinitely.


I think this is a case for professional tape. Maybe LTO?
AIT is heli-scan as well, with the associated complex and
problematic mechanics...

Arno
  #10  
Old August 21st 06, 04:35 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Jonathan Sachs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Selecting a DAT drive

On 21 Aug 2006 01:13:31 GMT, Arno Wagner wrote:

I think this is a case for professional tape. Maybe LTO?
AIT is heli-scan as well, with the associated complex and
problematic mechanics...


That's an interesting possibility. I assumed LTO was too far out of my
price range to warrant attention, but I look and found that LTO-1
drives are about as expensive as DDS-5 drives, and the tapes are
available for less than $10 each.

I've got a business trip coming up, and I don't have time to research
a new technology now. I think I'm going to buy a removable disk drive
so that I'll have SOME backup, then research this when I have more
time.

Any other pointers or hints you can give me about LTO technology and
brands will be appreciated!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hard Drive Temperature Nehmo General 36 October 27th 05 12:35 AM
Hard Drive Temperature Nehmo Storage (alternative) 37 October 27th 05 12:35 AM
Question about transfer speeds between HDs, and DMA mode ZigZag Master Overclocking AMD Processors 25 July 25th 04 09:56 PM
Windows XP fails to boot after Drive Image 7 restore Milleniumaire Storage (alternative) 11 February 28th 04 09:26 PM
FDISK, HDD #s, don't know how to install two HDDs. sunslight Storage (alternative) 14 October 29th 03 08:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.