If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
I'm getting ready to build another PC and am looking for a "pretty
good" PCI-E video card. It needs to be rock solid under WinXP Pro and reasonably quick. Cheap would be nice, but I'm prepared to spend more than $150 if I have to. I'm a software developer and spend a lot of time staring at Visual Studio or Eclipse, and the machine also gets a lot of use as the main household computer, with occasional use for Word and PowerPoint documents. Nobody in the house plays video games of any sort. I'm crossposting to the ATI and Nvidia groups because I've had good luck in the past with cards based on both chipsets; I have no religious feelings about either. I'll admit that I've paid no attention to the field for the last few years. Suggestions? -- Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
"Bert Hyman" wrote in message ... I'm getting ready to build another PC and am looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card. It needs to be rock solid under WinXP Pro and reasonably quick. Cheap would be nice, but I'm prepared to spend more than $150 if I have to. I'm a software developer and spend a lot of time staring at Visual Studio or Eclipse, and the machine also gets a lot of use as the main household computer, with occasional use for Word and PowerPoint documents. Nobody in the house plays video games of any sort. I'm crossposting to the ATI and Nvidia groups because I've had good luck in the past with cards based on both chipsets; I have no religious feelings about either. I'll admit that I've paid no attention to the field for the last few years. Suggestions? You are not gaming or doing AutoCAD. I would consider upgradability to run Vista Aero down the road at some point, but really this doesn't require a whole lot of juice either. So you can get an excellent card for your needs for less than $100. I would avoid cards with 64bit memory, and ones with small amounts of discrete dedicated RAM. Something like an X1300 Pro from ATI or the Nvidia 7300GT series with 128 or 256Mb. There's a lot of choice in this range. Just avoid the 64bit memory and turbocache/hypermemory variants. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
Augustus wrote:
"Bert Hyman" wrote in message ... I'm getting ready to build another PC and am looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card. It needs to be rock solid under WinXP Pro and reasonably quick. Cheap would be nice, but I'm prepared to spend more than $150 if I have to. I'm a software developer and spend a lot of time staring at Visual Studio or Eclipse, and the machine also gets a lot of use as the main household computer, with occasional use for Word and PowerPoint documents. Nobody in the house plays video games of any sort. I'm crossposting to the ATI and Nvidia groups because I've had good luck in the past with cards based on both chipsets; I have no religious feelings about either. I'll admit that I've paid no attention to the field for the last few years. Suggestions? You are not gaming or doing AutoCAD. I would consider upgradability to run Vista Aero down the road at some point, but really this doesn't require a whole lot of juice either. So you can get an excellent card for your needs for less than $100. I would avoid cards with 64bit memory, and ones with small amounts of discrete dedicated RAM. Something like an X1300 Pro from ATI or the Nvidia 7300GT series with 128 or 256Mb. There's a lot of choice in this range. Just avoid the 64bit memory and turbocache/hypermemory variants. I've got a little very recent first-hand experience with several computers and graphics cards. With the last few weeks, I've installed a 7300GT (fanless Gigabyte ~ $78 inc. shipping from ZipZoomFly), two 7600GS (one fanless Asus and one fan-cooled eVGA @ ~ $100 from newegg) and a 7600GT (fan-cooled BFG from newegg ~ $144 from newegg). All were 256mb cards. All cards were installed on Asus A8N-VM CSM boards as upgrades to onboard video. Three of the four systems had 2 gig memory, the HTPC has one gig memory. The 7300GT went into a general use / student computer (browser, email, MS Office applications, nothing "demanding") that sometimes plays DVDs or streaming movies. Works great even though it may be a little overkill. The 7600GS's were for a HDTV HTPC (fanless) and a second computer doing a lot of CAD. Both systems work great. 7600GT went into a general use PC that also runs MS Flight Simulator 2004. Maybe a little overkill, but definitely no complaints. Not much change in perceived "general" performance. Maybe a slight improvement in image rendering, maybe not. None of these cards share memory from the main system. So if the system has one or two gig, its not shared with video. I'm not sure I agree with the need to upgrade to Vista. It doesn't fix anything that's broken. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
I'm not sure I agree with the need to upgrade to Vista. It doesn't fix
anything that's broken. I wouldn't upgrade to Vista until SP1 and other issues have been addressed. But it doesn't hurt to get your budget card Aero capable. He may have it for 3-5 years. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
Augustus wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with the need to upgrade to Vista. It doesn't fix anything that's broken. I wouldn't upgrade to Vista until SP1 and other issues have been addressed. But it doesn't hurt to get your budget card Aero capable. He may have it for 3-5 years. XP will be supported that long. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
In the ATI product line, you can get an X1300 based product for about
$100, or an X1600 based product for less than twice that. Really, the X1300 with dedicated memory (at least 128MB if not more) is all you need for typical desktop use, and it will support Vista's Aero interface (I should add here to check that the BOARD has drivers for Vista with Aero support (WDDM drivers) .... the chip is capable of doing it, but the drivers can be come board specific rather than just chip specific). Bert Hyman wrote: I'm getting ready to build another PC and am looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card. It needs to be rock solid under WinXP Pro and reasonably quick. Cheap would be nice, but I'm prepared to spend more than $150 if I have to. I'm a software developer and spend a lot of time staring at Visual Studio or Eclipse, and the machine also gets a lot of use as the main household computer, with occasional use for Word and PowerPoint documents. Nobody in the house plays video games of any sort. I'm crossposting to the ATI and Nvidia groups because I've had good luck in the past with cards based on both chipsets; I have no religious feelings about either. I'll admit that I've paid no attention to the field for the last few years. Suggestions? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
Hey, Sky King: It just doesn't make to get a card that's not Vista
(Aero) compatible when one that is doesn't cost any more. Without regard to whether or not one has current plans to actually use Vista (plans change). Cessna 310 wrote: Augustus wrote: I'm not sure I agree with the need to upgrade to Vista. It doesn't fix anything that's broken. I wouldn't upgrade to Vista until SP1 and other issues have been addressed. But it doesn't hurt to get your budget card Aero capable. He may have it for 3-5 years. XP will be supported that long. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
"Barry Watzman" wrote in message ... Hey, Sky King: It just doesn't make to get a card that's not Vista (Aero) compatible when one that is doesn't cost any more. Without regard to whether or not one has current plans to actually use Vista (plans change). This is essentially my point. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a "pretty good" PCI-E video card ...
Augustus wrote:
"Barry Watzman" wrote in message ... Hey, Sky King: It just doesn't make to get a card that's not Vista (Aero) compatible when one that is doesn't cost any more. Without regard to whether or not one has current plans to actually use Vista (plans change). This is essentially my point. I don't know what you people are on about. It's hard to find a PCI-Express video board that is _not_ "Aero compatible". You'd have to pretty much set out deliberately to find one. Seems to me that it's a non-issue. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which Printer Is Pick Of The Crop "The Best" In Your Opinion My"Shortlist" | Heidy | Printers | 8 | March 17th 07 09:07 PM |
Force "medium present" or "device ready"? | Mike Richter | Cdr | 5 | October 23rd 06 12:12 AM |
Samsung ML-2150 (2152W) (1) suddenly prints all pages "almost" blank and (2) error message "HSync Engine Error" , not in user manual | Lady Margaret Thatcher | Printers | 5 | May 4th 06 04:51 AM |
Downside of changing "Max frames to render ahead"/"Prerender Limit" to 1/0? | Jeremy Reaban | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | March 31st 06 04:24 AM |
ASUS A8V & ATI AIW 9600 "inf" "thunk.exe" error message? | ByTor | AMD x86-64 Processors | 5 | January 13th 06 06:50 PM |