A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking AMD Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Every review i read say the Barton 3.2 is a dog, was thinkingof getting it not now.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th 04, 02:44 PM
We Live For The One We Die For The One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Every review i read say the Barton 3.2 is a dog, was thinkingof getting it not now.


Compared to the Intell 3.2 anyway.

But most reviews say the Athlon 64 kicks butt just need to sell my
Gran to pay for it, here granny

Bye.


  #2  
Old February 5th 04, 03:41 PM
rstlne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Compared to the Intell 3.2 anyway.

But most reviews say the Athlon 64 kicks butt just need to sell my
Gran to pay for it, here granny

Bye.


Dont you get tired of posting this..
You post this about once a week.. Or probably more by changing your nick..

I guess that you did finally go out and read some reviews tho cause in your
last few post you said that the A64FX's were dogs when compared to the
intel3.2


  #3  
Old February 5th 04, 04:13 PM
nobody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"rstlne" .@. wrote

Dont you get tired of posting this..
You post this about once a week.. Or probably more by changing your nick..

I guess that you did finally go out and read some reviews tho cause in

your
last few post you said that the A64FX's were dogs when compared to the
intel3.2


don't get tired of replying to trolls? really an annoyance for those that
have filtered the offender.




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #4  
Old February 5th 04, 07:00 PM
Wayne Youngman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"We Live For The One We Die For The One" wrote
Compared to the Intell 3.2 anyway.


But most reviews say the Athlon 64 kicks butt just need to sell my
Gran to pay for it, here granny




"rstlne"wrote
Dont you get tired of posting this..
You post this about once a week.. Or probably more by changing your nick..

I guess that you did finally go out and read some reviews tho cause in

your
last few post you said that the A64FX's were dogs when compared to the
intel3.2




"nobody" wrote
don't get tired of replying to trolls? really an annoyance for those that
have filtered the offender.



Hehe,
he is just a *kid* who is fantasising over a new build and *In THEORY* he
wants it to be perfect, but he is never gonna buy any of this stuff, he is a
*Paper builder* I think, that is someone who knows in theory what the best
kit is but can't build it. . . or won't build it because of the fear of
something better/newer coming out :P. .

Kinda been there, but at the end of the day you can take it *Theory* till it
makes your brain hurt, its the *Practical* side of buying and building a
spec that really pushed your knowledge/skill. . .

C'mon *We Live For The One We Die For The One* stop asking so many questions
and start building something. What machine do you have now anyway?
--
Wayne ][
new specs coming soon!



  #5  
Old February 5th 04, 07:32 PM
Wes Newell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 01:44:32 +1100, We Live For The One We Die For The One
wrote:


Compared to the Intell 3.2 anyway.

Don't know I'd go that far, but it's overated imo too. It should have been
a 3100+ imo.

But most reviews say the Athlon 64 kicks butt just need to sell my
Gran to pay for it, here granny

Well, at current pricing, the A64 3200+ is less than the P4 3.2, and the
3400+ is less than the the P4 3.4, so it looks like you'd need to sell
your granny in either case.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html
  #8  
Old February 6th 04, 02:48 AM
We Live For The One We Die For The One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I get all the info before i build, i don't just go and build a system
just because at the momment i don't need a new pc but i would like one
and i try to convince myself as a do want one don't need it, but the
longer i don't build it the mor emoney i save up and the faster the PC
will be when i do build it

I think the next pc will be a PCI Express Board X16 AMD 64_3400, 3 Gig
DDR2 Ram :0

Or somthing like that, just can't get myself turned on about CPus and
cards that are maybe atleast 15% faster.

Oh well.



On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:37:35 -0400, Chris Phillipo
wrote:

In article , We Live For The
One We Die For The One Mr says...

Compared to the Intell 3.2 anyway.

But most reviews say the Athlon 64 kicks butt just need to sell my
Gran to pay for it, here granny

Bye.




Is that why the intel costs so much more?


  #9  
Old February 6th 04, 12:39 PM
We Live For The One We Die For The One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Yea arround about then


On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:31:24 GMT, Never anonymous Bud
wrote:

While still snuggled in a 'spider hole', We Live For The One We Die For The One
Mr scribbled:

I think the next pc will be a PCI Express Board X16 AMD 64_3400, 3 Gig
DDR2 Ram :0


So you're not planning to upgrade until 2006?





To reply by email, remove the XYZ.

Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.

This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....


  #10  
Old February 6th 04, 01:15 PM
Wayne Youngman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Never anonymous Bud" wrote
So you're not planning to upgrade until 2006?




"We Live For The One We Die For The One"wrote
Yea arround about then



Hi,
ok so I take it you won't be asking so many questions until 2006 then? :P
--
Wayne ][
new specs coming soon!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the AMD Barton Discontiued? [email protected] General 11 January 2nd 05 11:12 PM
Harddisks: Seek, Read, Write, Read, Write, Slow ? Marc de Vries General 7 July 26th 04 02:57 AM
Please Read...A Must Read Trini4life2k2 General 1 March 8th 04 12:30 AM
Seagate SATA 120GB raw read errors Kierkecaat General 0 December 16th 03 02:52 PM
To Barton or not to Barton; That is the question Harkin Banks Overclocking AMD Processors 5 August 8th 03 03:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.