If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can't get display right in Win98
I worked on a Windows 98 system yesterday that had display problems I
couldn't fix. The main symptom was that it couldn't get any more than 256 colors or change screen resolutions. Classic, right? Just get the right drivers for the display card. Done it a million times. Customer had the CD that came with the ATI card, so I used its Setup program. Didn't work. Then tried just installing the drivers manually from here. Didn't work. Went to the ATI website to look for something new, but those didn't work either. At this point I decide the card must have gone bad for some reason, so I swapped it with a known good one I had, and then installed its software. Same result. Where do I go from there? This is a new situation, to me. What does this suggest? Windows or motherboard? I wonder if a PCI display card would have yielded different results. If so, would that mean the AGP part of the motherboard may have gone bad? Questions questions... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Did you try uninstalling the driver from safe mode first? . Did you check
your bios settings? Does this board happen to have onboard video? I doubt a PCI card is better. "Bob Nocshus" wrote in message ... I worked on a Windows 98 system yesterday that had display problems I couldn't fix. The main symptom was that it couldn't get any more than 256 colors or change screen resolutions. Classic, right? Just get the right drivers for the display card. Done it a million times. Customer had the CD that came with the ATI card, so I used its Setup program. Didn't work. Then tried just installing the drivers manually from here. Didn't work. Went to the ATI website to look for something new, but those didn't work either. At this point I decide the card must have gone bad for some reason, so I swapped it with a known good one I had, and then installed its software. Same result. Where do I go from there? This is a new situation, to me. What does this suggest? Windows or motherboard? I wonder if a PCI display card would have yielded different results. If so, would that mean the AGP part of the motherboard may have gone bad? Questions questions... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What does uninstalling the old driver from Safe Mode accomplish? I've never
approached it that way. I thought any new ones would just replace old ones. I don't approach application installations/replacements that way, but I guess I've always done it this way with drivers. I don't know if the motherboard has onboard video or not, but I know the monitor was only hooked up to these AGP cards. "tomcas" wrote in message et... Did you try uninstalling the driver from safe mode first? . Did you check your bios settings? Does this board happen to have onboard video? I doubt a PCI card is better. "Bob Nocshus" wrote in message ... I worked on a Windows 98 system yesterday that had display problems I couldn't fix. The main symptom was that it couldn't get any more than 256 colors or change screen resolutions. Classic, right? Just get the right drivers for the display card. Done it a million times. Customer had the CD that came with the ATI card, so I used its Setup program. Didn't work. Then tried just installing the drivers manually from here. Didn't work. Went to the ATI website to look for something new, but those didn't work either. At this point I decide the card must have gone bad for some reason, so I swapped it with a known good one I had, and then installed its software. Same result. Where do I go from there? This is a new situation, to me. What does this suggest? Windows or motherboard? I wonder if a PCI display card would have yielded different results. If so, would that mean the AGP part of the motherboard may have gone bad? Questions questions... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Nocshus" wrote in message ... I worked on a Windows 98 system yesterday that had display problems I couldn't fix. The main symptom was that it couldn't get any more than 256 colors or change screen resolutions. Classic, right? Just get the right drivers for the display card. Done it a million times. Customer had the CD that came with the ATI card, so I used its Setup program. Didn't work. Then tried just installing the drivers manually from here. Didn't work. Went to the ATI website to look for something new, but those didn't work either. At this point I decide the card must have gone bad for some reason, so I swapped it with a known good one I had, and then installed its software. Same result. Where do I go from there? This is a new situation, to me. What does this suggest? Windows or motherboard? I wonder if a PCI display card would have yielded different results. If so, would that mean the AGP part of the motherboard may have gone bad? Questions questions... Was it that there was no option for increasing the colors and resolution... or were you able to set the colors higher...but the monitor was just not able to display them? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"garwhite" wrote in message ... What does uninstalling the old driver from Safe Mode accomplish? I've never approached it that way. I thought any new ones would just replace old ones. I don't approach application installations/replacements that way, but I guess I've always done it this way with drivers. I don't know if the motherboard has onboard video or not, but I know the monitor was only hooked up to these AGP cards. I haven't used 98 for a while, but I have had to remove display drivers in safe mode to cure display problems. It has something to do with entries in the registry, start in normal mode and you just see the current display entry in device manager. Start in safe mode, on a problem 95/98 system, and you'll probably see two or three display entries in device manager. HTH -- Ian A7N8X Deluxe v1.04 Uber Bios 1006 + Sata Bios XP2500 @ 2400MHz Corsair Twinx1024-3200LLPT 200 x 12.0 ATI Radeon 9700Pro 2 x Maxtor 120GB 8MB SATA RAID 0 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The colors and screen resolution settings wouldn't budge -- exactly the way
they behave when you have the wrong drivers (or none but default) installed. "philo" wrote in message ... "Bob Nocshus" wrote in message ... I worked on a Windows 98 system yesterday that had display problems I couldn't fix. The main symptom was that it couldn't get any more than 256 colors or change screen resolutions. Classic, right? Just get the right drivers for the display card. Done it a million times. Customer had the CD that came with the ATI card, so I used its Setup program. Didn't work. Then tried just installing the drivers manually from here. Didn't work. Went to the ATI website to look for something new, but those didn't work either. At this point I decide the card must have gone bad for some reason, so I swapped it with a known good one I had, and then installed its software. Same result. Where do I go from there? This is a new situation, to me. What does this suggest? Windows or motherboard? I wonder if a PCI display card would have yielded different results. If so, would that mean the AGP part of the motherboard may have gone bad? Questions questions... Was it that there was no option for increasing the colors and resolution... or were you able to set the colors higher...but the monitor was just not able to display them? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting, but I'm not sure I was having that problem. Any time I tried
different drivers, Device Manager would display that change. Also, there was never more than one display adapter showing there, and, as I said, it changed every time I tried something different. Does this sound like the kind of situation that would likely have changed if I had first removed the drivers in Safe Mode. I'm thinking the solution lies elsewhere, but maybe not. I truly don't know. "IanDunbar" wrote in message ... "garwhite" wrote in message ... What does uninstalling the old driver from Safe Mode accomplish? I've never approached it that way. I thought any new ones would just replace old ones. I don't approach application installations/replacements that way, but I guess I've always done it this way with drivers. I don't know if the motherboard has onboard video or not, but I know the monitor was only hooked up to these AGP cards. I haven't used 98 for a while, but I have had to remove display drivers in safe mode to cure display problems. It has something to do with entries in the registry, start in normal mode and you just see the current display entry in device manager. Start in safe mode, on a problem 95/98 system, and you'll probably see two or three display entries in device manager. HTH -- Ian A7N8X Deluxe v1.04 Uber Bios 1006 + Sata Bios XP2500 @ 2400MHz Corsair Twinx1024-3200LLPT 200 x 12.0 ATI Radeon 9700Pro 2 x Maxtor 120GB 8MB SATA RAID 0 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"garwhite" wrote in message ... Interesting, but I'm not sure I was having that problem. Any time I tried different drivers, Device Manager would display that change. Yes it normally shows just the new driver, even when you have problems with it, unless you start in safe mode. Also, there was never more than one display adapter showing there, Did you get a chance to look in safe mode? I've only seen multiple entries from safe mode. Does this sound like the kind of situation that would likely have changed if I had first removed the drivers in Safe Mode. I'm thinking the solution lies elsewhere, but maybe not. I truly don't know. Display drivers in 95/98 have caused me hours (days?) of fun and games in the past, until I started clearing old drivers out first. The system had corrupt display drivers already by your description. I've never had a graphics card or an AGP slot fail, it's normally always software related IMO. -- Ian A7N8X Deluxe v1.04 Uber Bios 1006 + Sata Bios XP2500 @ 2400MHz Corsair Twinx1024-3200LLPT 200 x 12.0 ATI Radeon 9700Pro 2 x Maxtor 120GB 8MB SATA RAID 0 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"garwhite" wrote in message ... The colors and screen resolution settings wouldn't budge -- exactly the way they behave when you have the wrong drivers (or none but default) installed. then it must be some type of AGP problem (i'd guess) look in the bios to see if there is anything to tweak for the video |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I worked on a Windows 98 system yesterday that had display problems I couldn't fix. The main symptom was that it couldn't get any more than 256 colors or change screen resolutions. Classic, right? Just get the right drivers for the display card. Done it a million times. Customer had the CD that came with the ATI card, so I used its Setup program. Didn't work. Then tried just installing the drivers manually from here. Didn't work. Went to the ATI website to look for something new, but those didn't work either. At this point I decide the card must have gone bad for some reason, so I swapped it with a known good one I had, and then installed its software. Same result. Where do I go from there? This is a new situation, to me. What does this suggest? Windows or motherboard? I wonder if a PCI display card would have yielded different results. If so, would that mean the AGP part of the motherboard may have gone bad? Questions questions... If I don't use the install disk that came with my SyncMaster 955DF monitor, I get results like you have. __________ If you give a little they give a lot. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/disco |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laptop display died - Possible Help? | Cliff Roman | General | 2 | June 4th 04 01:34 AM |
Finished LCD digital image display | Douglas MacDonald | General | 2 | April 20th 04 03:54 AM |
[HLP] LCD knowledgeable - PDA Display | Fjordur | General | 0 | March 30th 04 02:31 PM |
display problem for compaq notebook 3000 series | Julia Jin | General | 0 | February 20th 04 01:01 AM |
Problem in Display of ASUS MotherBoard A7V266-MX | S S Robert | General | 0 | January 12th 04 06:30 AM |