Typical mains power for mid-range PC?

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:15:50 -0400, kony Gave us:

If the chip was already fairly hot in it's running state and
it was a "runaway", as you wrote, no.

I talked about spotting a runaway BEFORE it occurs. You are the one
that is too goddamned retarded to grasp things for what they are.

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:51:40 -0400, kony Gave us:

What you don't get, is what is _ACTUALLY_ being done.

You have no clue as to what I get or do not get.

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:51:40 -0400, kony Gave us:


We're taking a REAL hard drive, that REALLY needs to be
working when you're done playing with it, and REALLY needs
to be in the same original condition when the measurements
are concluded.

All the more reason to utilize the IR solution, you retarded chump!

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:51:40 -0400, kony Gave us:

You suggest a means that takes great time, expense,
equipment,

Again, ****tard, it takes minutes to set up an imager and begin
taking readings on an operating device.

and then it was all a waste because you don't
have the rest of the data, only your supposed accurate
enough temp that must then be extrapolated still.

You're an idiot.

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:51:40 -0400, kony Gave us:

I think you're a one trick pony,

I think you're a pile of dung. Your maturity level certainly shows
that it isn't much higher than that of a freshly laid pile.

you've told us everything
you know and have never had to apply it to real world
situations.

You're an idiot.

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:55:34 -0400, kony Gave us:

It's not the knowing how part that you fail on,

I have not failed on anything, dumbass.

it's the
knowing when, and why, and whether you have an expectation
of being able to reach the desired goal or will only be able
to get the epoxy temp reading and not any useful purpose
beyond that.

You're an idiot.

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:55:34 -0400, kony Gave us:

It's kinda like using usenet, you start out being able to
do one part of it ok, but you fail to get the job done
acceptably.

Good thing I don't have to measure up to your E-1 grade, unqualified
assessments of how one is to use Usenet. You can't even write the
word correctly.

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:52:44 -0400, kony Gave us:

Tell that to anyone who has had a heat induced failure. Bet
they'll be glad to know you pretended to know better.


All failures are heat induced in electronics. Even if that happens
in the micro realm, and is not readily observable externally.

Phat Bytestard wrote
kony wrote

Tell that to anyone who has had a heat induced failure.
Bet they'll be glad to know you pretended to know better.

All failures are heat induced in electronics.

Wrong. Most obviously with static damage.

Even if that happens in the micro realm,
and is not readily observable externally.

Pathetic, really.

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 17:17:50 +1000, "Rod Speed"
Gave us:

Phat Bytestard wrote
kony wrote

Tell that to anyone who has had a heat induced failure.
Bet they'll be glad to know you pretended to know better.

All failures are heat induced in electronics.

Wrong. Most obviously with static damage.

You actually think there is no heat in an ESD event?

Even if that happens in the micro realm,
and is not readily observable externally.

Pathetic, really.

You really have to give up this childish lame.

It's totally meaningless... really.

You probably think there is no heat in ultrasonic welding of plastic
too. You'd be wrong on that one as well.