If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
I have a laptop and I need the ability to attach a much faster drive
for some work that I'm doing. The laptop doesn't have firewire so I'm looking at either USB2 or buying a PCMCIA SATA card. I presume that using SATA as an interface would be significantly faster. Does hotplugging work fine in this situation, are there any drawbacks? I'm going to be holding a large database on the disk, so latency is much more important than throughput. Graham |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
Arno Wagner wrote: Previously wrote: I have a laptop and I need the ability to attach a much faster drive for some work that I'm doing. The laptop doesn't have firewire so I'm looking at either USB2 or buying a PCMCIA SATA card. I presume that using SATA as an interface would be significantly faster. Does hotplugging work fine in this situation, are there any drawbacks? Whether hotplugging works depends on your OS and hardware. As to the speed, that depends on the PCMCIA card and your PCMCIA bus. If it is an old 16 bit bus, then it can transfer about 1MB/sec. A newer 32 bit one can transfer more, but the controller and the SATA adapter may each slow things down. It's a Pentium-M based laptop with a 33Mhz 32bit Cardbus slot. By my reckoning that should be around 1Gb/s. I'm pretty sure that even the 16bit slots are significantly faster than 1MB/sec, but it's been many years since i've worked in that hardware space. I'd have thought that since PCMCIA seems to support ATA pretty much natively, it'd have a very low command translation overhead. USB's endpoint based architecture is quite a departure from the way the hardware oprerates so i'd expect it to be slower. This will be primarily for WIn XP Pro, although might be occasionally used in Linux. I'm going to be holding a large database on the disk, so latency is much more important than throughput. Then I would think that SATA has a slight edge, but USB (as long as it is 2.0) should be o.k., too. And USB hotplug does work reliably in my experience. Perhaps I can find a dual mode enclosure that will run both USB2 and SATA, that way I can fall back on USB if the SATA doesn't pan out. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
wrote in message oups.com... I have a laptop and I need the ability to attach a much faster drive for some work that I'm doing. The laptop doesn't have firewire so I'm looking at either USB2 or buying a PCMCIA SATA card. I presume that using SATA as an interface would be significantly faster. Does hotplugging work fine in this situation, are there any drawbacks? It's a Pentium-M based laptop with a 33Mhz 32bit Cardbus slot. By my reckoning that should be around 1Gb/s. I'm pretty sure that even the 16bit slots are significantly faster than 1MB/sec, but it's been many years since i've worked in that hardware space. I'd have thought that since PCMCIA seems to support ATA pretty much natively, it'd have a very low command translation overhead. USB's endpoint based architecture is quite a departure from the way the hardware oprerates so i'd expect it to be slower. This will be primarily for WIn XP Pro, although might be occasionally used in Linux. I'm going to be holding a large database on the disk, so latency is much more important than throughput. Then I would think that SATA has a slight edge, but USB (as long as it is 2.0) should be o.k., too. And USB hotplug does work reliably in my experience. Perhaps I can find a dual mode enclosure that will run both USB2 and SATA, that way I can fall back on USB if the SATA doesn't pan out. grahamsz: Let me add a few thoughts for your consideration... Assuming there are no connectivity issues involving the PCMCIA SATA card with the SATA HD (not that there should be but I haven't as yet worked with that specific type of card)... There are considerable advantages in utilizing a SATA HD as an external device for your laptop. I'm speaking here, of course, in terms of a direct SATA-to-SATA connection as would be the case with the SATA HD connected directly to the PCMCIA SATA card. 1. The data transfer rate would be significantly faster as compared with a USB/Firewire device. 2. The system will treat the SATA HD as an *internal* HD so that if you use the SATA HD as the repository of a clone of your laptop's internal HD (using a disk imaging program, e.g., Symantec's Norton Ghost or Acronis True Image), which I assume is a primary objective of yours, the SATA HD will be bootable - unlike a USB/Firewire external HD. Perhaps I should say "may be bootable" in this case. Now that I think about it I'm uncertain as to whether the connection to the PCMCIA SATA card would permit a boot from that device. Would you have this information/documentation available? But even assuming that boot capability did not exist, in my view that would not negate the desirability of using this approach because of the considerably superior performance of the SATA drive vis-a-vis a USB/Firewire external HD. 3. In virtually every case, the SATA drive will be "hot pluggable" - similar to that of a USB/Firewire EHD. Should you go this route, you will, of course, need an enclosure for the SATA HD that provides for a direct SATA-to-SATA connection as well as provides power to the drive. There are a number of these enclosures on the market, many (if not most) of which are combo units, i.e., provide both USB & SATA connections. A Google search should point you to a number of vendors carrying this type of equipment. I'm assuming your current laptop's HD is a PATA drive, so that there would be no pressing need for you to purchase a 2 1/2" HD since it could not serve as a possible replacement for your laptop's internal HD. Presumably you would obtain a 3 1/2" (desktop PC) HD I would think, although if you might consider a 2 1/2" SATA HD for some not-yet-anticipated future needs obviously the enclosure would have to be designed for that component. I would guess those are currently available as well although all the one's I've come across have been designed to accommodate 3 1/2" drives. No doubt a Google search will turn up something. Anna |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
Up
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
Hello,
I completely agree with Anna about external SATA storage advantages and I'm convinced that this support will be more developped on laptops sooner or later... No driver required with XP. It is hot-swapable (by default). And in Windows system, there is the choice between performance or hot-swap mode. As my HD enclosure can be connected in FW/USB2/SATA, I have compared on "heavy" softwares (audio & video editing), large files loading and copying, etc... and it is quite faster and more stable even than my internal 7200tps 2.5" HD! I have a cheap/generic PCMCIA SATA controller card, based on a SIL3112 chipset, that looks like that : http://media.ldlc.com/photosldlc/00/...00405361_2.jpg Unfortunately I have just one problem : I found no issue to boot WinXP on the external sata HD :crybaby: Even pressing F6 during the install process, and once SIL3112 SATALINK drivers are installed, Windows can't "see" any partition on the sata drive. I think I've missed something... but what? Any idee?? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
Previously cedrouby wrote:
Hello, I completely agree with Anna about external SATA storage advantages and I'm convinced that this support will be more developped on laptops sooner or later... I also agree with this. Adding an eSATA port to a laptop if both obvious and should not be a major cost factor. No driver required with XP. It is hot-swapable (by default). And in Windows system, there is the choice between performance or hot-swap mode. You get the same with Linux, although the approach is a bit different. Linux needs a driver, but the standard kernel driver is sufficient. (Linux even allows you to use or remove the IDE driver, so needing a driver is not a drawback, as long as it is a kernel-driver...) As for performance or hot-swap, that would be normal mount or "sync" mount. Hot-swapping for SATA in Linux is still problematic, (it is unreliable and therefore not available in the "stable" kernels), but this should be solved in the not too distant future. As my HD enclosure can be connected in FW/USB2/SATA, I have compared on "heavy" softwares (audio & video editing), large files loading and copying, etc... and it is quite faster and more stable even than my internal 7200tps 2.5" HD! Not ruprising. I have a cheap/generic PCMCIA SATA controller card, based on a SIL3112 chipset, that looks like that : http://media.ldlc.com/photosldlc/00/...00405361_2.jpg Unfortunately I have just one problem : I found no issue to boot WinXP on the external sata HD :crybaby: That should be a controller limitation and vanish with a laptop-integrated controller. Even pressing F6 during the install process, and once SIL3112 SATALINK drivers are installed, Windows can't "see" any partition on the sata drive. I think I've missed something... but what? Any idee?? This is very likely a problem with the cards BIOS or the driver. Can you create partitions on an empty disk? Arno |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
cedrouby wrote:
Hello, I completely agree with Anna about external SATA storage advantages and I'm convinced that this support will be more developped on laptops sooner or later... I sure wish we could just get USB3 instead. USB has made great strides in reducing the number of different connectors and cables needed, and is so far backwards-compatible. I would rather see another backwards compatible generation than something different. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
External SATA drive for laptop
"timeOday" wrote:
cedrouby wrote: Hello, I completely agree with Anna about external SATA storage advantages and I'm convinced that this support will be more developped on laptops sooner or later... I sure wish we could just get USB3 instead. USB has made great strides in reducing the number of different connectors and cables needed, and is so far backwards-compatible. I would rather see another backwards compatible generation than something different. The only thing "different" needed to implement External SATA is to put an eSATA connector on the back of the laptop. It's just a more secure connector (physically) and includes shielding. Otherwise, it's compatible physically and electrically with regular SATA cables. Since SATA is faster than USB, I'd much rather use a SATA link to the external hard drive. *TimDaniels* |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Economics of SATA hard drive | Warra | Storage (alternative) | 185 | July 1st 06 08:04 PM |
best cloning method? | [email protected] | Storage (alternative) | 72 | April 1st 06 07:40 PM |
Help needed changing from IDE to SATA drives | Ward | Storage (alternative) | 1 | December 10th 04 07:04 PM |
Removable Drive Bays | Rod Speed | Storage (alternative) | 35 | January 3rd 04 08:31 PM |