A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AMD Athlon 64FX first impressions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 28th 03, 11:12 AM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AMD Athlon 64FX first impressions

Well today we received 2 NEW AMD CPU's, the Athlon 64FX and Athlon 64 3200+.
The mainboards were pre-production Gigabyte, GA-K8NNXP and GA-K8NNXP-940. A
good start CPU coolers fit like the P4 so the risk of damage when fitting is
much lower. We found that the N-vidia FX5900 (Asus) video cards did not
perform that well and that the ATI Radeon 9800 pro (Sapphire) worked much
better and had an easier install on both systems. We monitored both CPU's
with a NAMAS calibrated thermocouple 'K' type recording 48c idle for the
Athlon 64 and 56c under load, the FX chip was hotter by 4c at idle and under
load but neither caused a problem, though this is on a bench not in a case.
We loaded Windows XP some updates and patches both ran stable on the 3 day
burn in test, though the 32bit OS on the Athlon 64 3200+ showed results no
better than the Athlon XP3200+, the FX did how ever but at double the price
you would expect this. Then came out our BETA Windows XP64 OS, loaded well
on both machines and seemed stable, then we loaded the drivers and bang,
blue screens, rebooting and all sorts of driver conflicts, we have narrowed
it down to the USB2 driver the IEEE1394 and onboard sound, if we disable
any one of these the other 2 work but not all 3 together. So at the moment
we have a cheap soundcard in which has helped but not entirely cured the
problem. Both systems ran quite a bit faster using the 64bit OS though in
real terms it was not something you would see by eye. We used 1Gb (2x512Mb)
of OCZ EL DDR RAM PC3200 Dual Channel Platinum memory CL 2-2-3-5. At
present cost of the chips and the 63bit OS make this an expensive option and
in comparison to a 3.2GHz P4 system the Athlon 64 3200+ was 20% more
expensive
for no gain if you used a 32bit OS, the Athlon XP3200+ would be a cheaper
and better bet. The price of XP64 will determine the success of this chip,
chip prices may fall in the future but Microsoft is not known for dropping
the price of it's OS and XP64 bit edition is likely to be 50% more than the
32bit version.
--
Chris
Technical director CKCCOMPUSCRIPT
Apple Computers, Intel, Roland audio, ATI, Microsoft, Sun Solaris, Cisco and
Silicone Graphics.
Wholesale distributor and specialist audio visual computers and servers
FREE SUPPORT @,
http://www.ckccomp.plus.com/site/page.HTM



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asus A7V333 rev. 1.02 + AMD XP1800+ Jean General 0 September 6th 03 08:57 PM
Which fan is best for Athlon XP 2600+ James Walton General 22 July 24th 03 06:33 PM
Is Athlon XP 1700+ much cooler than Athlon 1300? robc General 3 July 10th 03 04:27 PM
Computer won't boot with 2000+ Athlon, 2100+ Athlon works just fine Cyde Weys General 4 July 3rd 03 12:16 PM
quick questions regarding Athlon XP fred.do General 4 June 25th 03 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.