A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Old WD 2GB works on one IDE channel, not other



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 16th 04, 05:02 PM
larrymoencurly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Old WD 2GB works on one IDE channel, not other

I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to transfer files
from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but the BIOS didn't recognize the
WD drive when it was plugged into the first IDE channel but worked
fine on the second channel. So I thought that the first channel was
bad, but it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD. I
tried a different cable (both 40-wire), and the jumpers seemed fine
(set for Master, No Slave and Master With Slave, only one drive per
cable). Voltage meter showed +5.14V and +12.08V (AT PSU, mobo and HD
connectors).

Is there something odd about certain old WD drives that make them act
this way? I think this happened once before with a different mobo.
  #2  
Old August 16th 04, 06:30 PM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

larrymoencurly wrote:

I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to transfer files
from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but the BIOS didn't recognize the
WD drive when it was plugged into the first IDE channel but worked
fine on the second channel. So I thought that the first channel was
bad, but it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD. I
tried a different cable (both 40-wire), and the jumpers seemed fine
(set for Master, No Slave and Master With Slave, only one drive per
cable). Voltage meter showed +5.14V and +12.08V (AT PSU, mobo and HD
connectors).

Is there something odd about certain old WD drives that make them act
this way? I think this happened once before with a different mobo.


Shouldn't matter which IDE channel and it should be set for Master with no
slave when it's the only drive on the one channel (cable). Master with
slave when there's a second drive on the same IDE channel (cable).

I.E. If you're putting each drive on a separate channel (cable), as you
seem to describe, BOTH are the Master on their respective IDE channel
(cable) with no slaves and both should be set as master with no slave.

  #3  
Old August 16th 04, 07:40 PM
Mike Tomlinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
larrymoencurly writes

Is there something odd about certain old WD drives that make them act
this way? I think this happened once before with a different mobo.


Some (all?) WD drives have an unusual jumpering configuration. They
have "single", "master" and "slave".

http://support.wdc.com/techinfo/general/jumpers.asp

What you want is the "single" setting. If you choose "master", the
drive will timeout waiting for a non-existent slave drive to come ready.

--
..sigmonster on vacation


  #4  
Old August 17th 04, 12:06 AM
Folkert Rienstra
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"larrymoencurly" wrote in message om
I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to transfer files
from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but the BIOS didn't recognize the
WD drive when it was plugged into the first IDE channel but worked
fine on the second channel. So I thought that the first channel was
bad, but it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD.


So, if I read you correctly, it is working fine on it's own on the second
channel but not on its own on the first, using the same jumper settings in
both cases?

I tried a different cable (both 40-wire), and the jumpers seemed fine


(set for Master, No Slave and Master With Slave, only one drive per
cable).


That sentence does not make sense.

Voltage meter showed +5.14V and +12.08V (AT PSU, mobo and HD connectors).


Is there something odd


Yes, but not what you described. Although, it not really clear what
you actually describe, especially after that second sentence.

about certain old WD drives that make them act this way?


Drives have no idea what channel they are on.
They should act the same on both channels in identical combinations.
You did of course check that all drives are treated identical by the BIOS?

I think this happened once before with a different mobo.

  #5  
Old August 17th 04, 12:18 AM
Jon Danniken
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"larrymoencurly" wrote:
I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to transfer files
from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but the BIOS didn't recognize the
WD drive when it was plugged into the first IDE channel but worked
fine on the second channel. So I thought that the first channel was
bad, but it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD. I
tried a different cable (both 40-wire), and the jumpers seemed fine
(set for Master, No Slave and Master With Slave, only one drive per
cable). Voltage meter showed +5.14V and +12.08V (AT PSU, mobo and HD
connectors).


Didja try the 'cable select" mode?

Jon
  #6  
Old August 17th 04, 11:29 AM
larrymoencurly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Folkert Rienstra" wrote in message ...
"larrymoencurly" wrote in message om


I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to
transfer files from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but
the BIOS didn't recognize the WD drive when it was plugged
into the first IDE channel but worked fine on the second
channel. So I thought that the first channel was bad, but
it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD.


So, if I read you correctly, it is working fine on it's own
on the second channel but not on its own on the first, using
the same jumper settings in both cases?


Correct.

Is there something odd


Yes, but not what you described. Although, it not really
clear what you actually describe, especially after that
second sentence.


I meant that I tried the WD-22100 with only the MAster jumper
installed, and then I tried it with no jumpers installed (the
recommended setting for master w/o slave present).


about certain old WD drives that make them act this way?


Drives have no idea what channel they are on.
They should act the same on both channels in identical combinations.
You did of course check that all drives are treated identical by the BIOS?


The BIOS (Award version 4.51) was set to "AUTO" for every IDE device.
  #7  
Old August 17th 04, 02:37 PM
Folkert Rienstra
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jon Danniken" wrote in message
"larrymoencurly" wrote:
I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to transfer files
from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but the BIOS didn't recognize
the WD drive when it was plugged into the first IDE channel but worked
fine on the second channel. So I thought that the first channel was
bad, but it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD.
I tried a different cable (both 40-wire), and the jumpers seemed fine
(set for Master, No Slave and Master With Slave, only one drive per
cable). Voltage meter showed +5.14V and +12.08V (AT PSU, mobo and
HD connectors).


Didja try the 'cable select" mode?


With a 40-wire cable?


Jon

  #8  
Old August 17th 04, 02:48 PM
Folkert Rienstra
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"larrymoencurly" wrote in message om...
"Folkert Rienstra" wrote in message
"larrymoencurly" wrote in message om


I was using an old Intel 430HX type mobo and trying to
transfer files from an old WD-22100 to a newer HD, but
the BIOS didn't recognize the WD drive when it was plugged
into the first IDE channel but worked fine on the second
channel. So I thought that the first channel was bad, but
it worked fine with other drives, including a 1.6GB WD.


So, if I read you correctly, it is working fine on it's own
on the second channel but not on its own on the first, using
the same jumper settings in both cases?


Correct.


That is odd. I don't see any easy explanation for that.
Sounds like one of those situations where you learn to live with it.


Is there something odd


Yes, but not what you described. Although, it not really
clear what you actually describe, especially after that
second sentence.


I meant that I tried the WD-22100 with only the MAster jumper
installed, and then I tried it with no jumpers installed (the
recommended setting for master w/o slave present).


about certain old WD drives that make them act this way?


Drives have no idea what channel they are on.
They should act the same on both channels in identical combinations.
You did of course check that all drives are treated identical by the BIOS?


The BIOS (Award version 4.51) was set to "AUTO" for every IDE device.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are AMD Athlon 64 Socket 939 processors with 4 double sided DDR400 modules in dual channel mode limited to DDR333? Glzmo Overclocking AMD Processors 1 October 4th 04 10:17 AM
Sisoft Sandra - does it indicate if ram is running in dual channel mode Paul Overclocking 6 September 30th 04 07:53 PM
Dual channel question Augustus Overclocking AMD Processors 2 July 2nd 04 05:51 PM
my new mobo o/c's great rockerrock Overclocking AMD Processors 9 June 30th 04 08:17 PM
Benefit of Dual Channel DDR with Athlon Matt Overclocking 1 August 13th 03 03:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.