Greater market share in Canada, EMC or HDS?

Does anyone have any numbers on this? Can you break it down by major
cities?
Any good websites that discuss this?

Thanks.

"Cooler" wrote in news:1106961271.340983.40300
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Does anyone have any numbers on this? Can you break it down by major
cities?
Any good websites that discuss this?

Thanks.


If I can ask, why do you care? I know EMC has dedicated offices in all
major cities and HDS about the same. Do you have a service issue?

Thanks for the info. Paul.

chili7 wrote:
"Cooler" wrote in news:1106961271.340983.40300
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Does anyone have any numbers on this? Can you break it down by
major
cities?
Any good websites that discuss this?

Thanks.


If I can ask, why do you care? I know EMC has dedicated offices in
all
major cities and HDS about the same. Do you have a service issue?

"Cooler" wrote in news:1106964048.195196.238010
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Thanks for the info. Paul.

chili7 wrote:
"Cooler" wrote in news:1106961271.340983.40300
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Does anyone have any numbers on this? Can you break it down by
major
cities?
Any good websites that discuss this?

Thanks.


If I can ask, why do you care? I know EMC has dedicated offices in
all
major cities and HDS about the same. Do you have a service issue?


Paul?

Sorry. Wrong newsgroup. My mistake.

Hi Keith,

Interestingly enough, while I am a big fan of HDS, they are far from
competing with EMC globally. (don't know about Canada though, sorry - I'm an
Aussie)

Global market share in network storage: (NAS & SAN combined)

1. EMC
2. IBM
3. HPq
4. NetApp
5. HDS

That's right, NetApp now has greater global networked storage market share
than HDS, even if you assign the gFilers that HDS rebadges from NetApp to
HDS...

IBM and HP obviously leverage their server market dominance to push their
storage solutions very successfully, even though their technology is well
behind the dedicated storage vendors.

For LUN managment technology, the order would have to be NetApp, then EMC
then HDS. (NetApp's virtualisation is extraordinarily ahead of everyone -
arbitrary sized volumes, regardless of block or file protocols or FC or GbE
attach, that can be resized by arbitrary amounts, without stopping
applications... EMC Symmetrix & CLARiiON and HDS Lightning & Thunder are all
nowhere near there yet)




"Cooler" wrote in message
ups.com...
Does anyone have any numbers on this? Can you break it down by major
cities?
Any good websites that discuss this?

Thanks.

Thanks. That's great information.
As for virtualization don't you think HDS' Tagmastore beats all the
others?
In the US, the press releases state this.