If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
https://www.techradar.com/news/usb4-...u-need-to-know Will I need it? Probably not for the next 3-4 years. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
Shadow wrote:
https://www.techradar.com/news/usb4-...u-need-to-know Will I need it? Probably not for the next 3-4 years. []'s At some point, your processor can't keep up. There are limits as to how fast things work currently. Presumably the logic block will be powered down when you're not using it. That would be nice. No, I won't be buying a card with a Thunderbolt controller on it, just for this reason. Currently, you can buy an adapter housing for an NVMe that runs at 1GB/sec and has a USB 3.x interface on it. Which is pretty decent. Macrium would not run with the 1GB/sec device, at 1GB/sec. Since Macrium computes a checksum (could be MD5), that tends to be the rate-limiting step. But useless benchmarks will benefit from your new hardware. Which is good in some circles. (Benchmark club, Computer club) During a benchmark, the deposit of read data in RAM is ignored, and only the "done" bit is checked. That's how a benchmark can run that much faster, by not having to "plow" through the actual data. DMA transfer puts it in memory. Any process that actually deals with the data, would rate limit what you're doing. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 13:50:40 -0300, Shadow wrote:
Will I need it? Probably not for the next 3-4 years. But will you /want/ it? -- s|b |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
I'm still using USB(1-3) at home. :/
-- Colony is currently infected/sick with a nasty flu! It came early too. Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / / /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.ma.cx. Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail. | |o o| | \ _ / ( ) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:42:09 +0200, "s|b" wrote:
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 13:50:40 -0300, Shadow wrote: Will I need it? Probably not for the next 3-4 years. But will you /want/ it? Unlikely. Unless they make drivers for XP. With an adaptor that plugs into my USB3 port? Not much of a "win" there. []'s PS Maybe on Linux, but my ASUS board will hopefully last another 5 years or so. (It's just over a year old). USB5 will probably be the "hype" by then. -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 12:51:49 AM UTC+8, Shadow wrote:
Will I need it? Probably not for the next 3-4 years. well MIDI is still on version 1 after more than 30 years. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
USB4 article
wrote:
On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 12:51:49 AM UTC+8, Shadow wrote: Will I need it? Probably not for the next 3-4 years. well MIDI is still on version 1 after more than 30 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIDI "The MIDI 2.0 initiative, announced in January 2019 ... The new protocol, then tentatively called "HD Protocol" ... has been researched since 2005 " The research is going at a blistering pace. But you can't argue with the results though. Many other standards bodies make an awful mess when they do things. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USB 3.0 article | RnR[_2_] | Dell Computers | 11 | January 26th 08 12:58 PM |
Article: Overclocking A64's | Ed Light | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | February 11th 06 12:38 AM |
Article: Overclocking 64's | Ed Light | AMD x86-64 Processors | 2 | February 10th 06 02:26 AM |
AMD 64 Article | Centroid | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | June 2nd 04 04:16 AM |
5900 XT faq article | Nada | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | May 7th 04 01:45 PM |