If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HEY CRAIG SUTTON (World Premie Skybuck's Memory Read Performance Test) :)
Hey Craig,
You wanted some benchmarks numbers didn't you ? Well I just updated and improved my memory read performance test benchmark. And because you so stubern I decided to share it with you and the rest of the world but ofcourse not indefinetly so get it while you can. Normally I don't release these "in-house" tools Here is the link to the zip file containing the software/program/executable and a short manual which also contains some benchmark numbers (at the bottom of the manual). It's up to you if you have the balls to run it. There is no virus in it. But I understand if you don't want to run it. If you do run it it would be very interesting to compare results... It would also be interesting if other people ran this software and posted their results. I expected the numbers to be higher when the memory size was lower... because of cache hits. This seems not to be the case. I have no idea why that is. The software is able to run 4 threads. I wrote it to test my dual core processor. Only two threads would have been enough but I wondered what would happen with 4 threads. As the manual describes this software is not really ment to test multi core processors...(since the threads can only be instructed to run on core 0 or core 1 or all cores by selecting none.) though it might be usefull anyway. Here is the link to the softwa http://home.12move.nl/skybuck/Skybuc...Version005.zip Bye, Skybuck. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
HEY CRAIG SUTTON (World Premie Skybuck's Memory Read Performance Test) :)
Skybuck Flying wrote:
Hey Craig, You wanted some benchmarks numbers didn't you ? Well I just updated and improved my memory read performance test benchmark. And because you so stubern I decided to share it with you and the rest of the world but ofcourse not indefinetly so get it while you can. Normally I don't release these "in-house" tools Here is the link to the zip file containing the software/program/executable and a short manual which also contains some benchmark numbers (at the bottom of the manual). It's up to you if you have the balls to run it. There is no virus in it. But I understand if you don't want to run it. If you do run it it would be very interesting to compare results... It would also be interesting if other people ran this software and posted their results. I expected the numbers to be higher when the memory size was lower... because of cache hits. This seems not to be the case. I have no idea why that is. The software is able to run 4 threads. I wrote it to test my dual core processor. Only two threads would have been enough but I wondered what would happen with 4 threads. As the manual describes this software is not really ment to test multi core processors...(since the threads can only be instructed to run on core 0 or core 1 or all cores by selecting none.) though it might be usefull anyway. Here is the link to the softwa http://home.12move.nl/skybuck/Skybuc...nceTestVersion 005.zip Bye, Skybuck. This have to do with ASUS how? Best Regards, Damiel Mandic |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
HEY CRAIG SUTTON (World Premie Skybuck's Memory Read Performance Test) :)
"Skybuck Flying" wrote in message . nl... Hey Craig, You wanted some benchmarks numbers didn't you ? Well I just updated and improved my memory read performance test benchmark. And because you so stubern I decided to share it with you and the rest of the world but ofcourse not indefinetly so get it while you can. Normally I don't release these "in-house" tools Here is the link to the zip file containing the software/program/executable and a short manual which also contains some benchmark numbers (at the bottom of the manual). It's up to you if you have the balls to run it. There is no virus in it. But I understand if you don't want to run it. If you do run it it would be very interesting to compare results... It would also be interesting if other people ran this software and posted their results. I expected the numbers to be higher when the memory size was lower... because of cache hits. This seems not to be the case. I have no idea why that is. The software is able to run 4 threads. I wrote it to test my dual core processor. Only two threads would have been enough but I wondered what would happen with 4 threads. As the manual describes this software is not really ment to test multi core processors...(since the threads can only be instructed to run on core 0 or core 1 or all cores by selecting none.) though it might be usefull anyway. Here is the link to the softwa http://home.12move.nl/skybuck/Skybuc...Version005.zip Thanks bucky I will test it |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
HEY CRAIG SUTTON (World Premie Skybuck's Memory Read Performance Test) :)
"Skybuck Flying" wrote in message . nl... Hey Craig, You wanted some benchmarks numbers didn't you ? Well I just updated and improved my memory read performance test benchmark. And because you so stubern I decided to share it with you and the rest of the world but ofcourse not indefinetly so get it while you can. My p3 450 gives around 18-19000 at the 64 default. Might try it on the new box later. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
HEY CRAIG SUTTON (World Premie Skybuck's Memory Read Performance Test) :)
"Craig Sutton" wrote in message ... "Skybuck Flying" wrote in message . nl... Hey Craig, You wanted some benchmarks numbers didn't you ? Well I just updated and improved my memory read performance test benchmark. And because you so stubern I decided to share it with you and the rest of the world but ofcourse not indefinetly so get it while you can. My p3 450 gives around 18-19000 at the 64 default. Might try it on the new box later. Ok cool. Bye, Skybuck. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fsb speed - why does it matter? | James Hanley | Overclocking | 52 | November 7th 04 01:04 PM |
I still don't completly understand FSB.... | legion | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | October 28th 04 03:20 AM |
my new mobo o/c's great | rockerrock | Overclocking AMD Processors | 9 | June 30th 04 08:17 PM |
64 benches | Ed Light | AMD x86-64 Processors | 2 | April 4th 04 08:16 PM |
What RAm for A7V8X-X? | Devast8or | Asus Motherboards | 9 | August 2nd 03 02:05 PM |