Clogged Black on i560

measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:

Frank





You seem well acquainted with that stuff SHMUCK :-D



Your personality (or lack thereof) is a dead give away. :-P
Frank



Why is your tongue brown. Are you an AssEater

Your printer heads have apparently become clogged with those expensive,
overpriced, OEM inks that you exclusively use in the one lone printer
you own because my tongue is red.
No bozos!
Frank

Nelson wrote:
"Michael Johnson, PE" wrote in
:


PC Medic wrote:

"Michael Johnson, PE" wrote in message
...


Frank wrote:


measekite wrote:



Canon thinks people like you are fools.


Yon may think that Canon thinks people like Burt et al are fools.
But as usual you'd be dead wrong.
"Think" is operative word here.
For sure, Canon KNOWS that people like you are the real fools who
are willing to pay for their very overpriced OEM inks and keep their
execs in very high paying salaries and great bonuses.
They depends on fools like you.
Without fools like you, who are willing to pay at least 4 times as
much for their OEM inks as compared to 3rd's, they'd have to start
discounting their overpriced OEM inks, or take a pay cut.
But as long as there are fools like you, those great salaries plus
raises and bonuses just keep on coming.
I do hope they send you a wonderful Xmas thank you card every year.
Fool!
Frank

Also, let's not forget that it's the people buying OEM ink that keeps
the price of inkjet printers low. For that, I am greatful to them.
Under the current senario I get inexpensive printers AND inexpensive
ink. This is why I don't mind that measekite buys, and promotes the
use of, OEM ink. It's good for my bank account.


I would love to here the logic you base that statement on.

Consider it your homework assignment to figure it out.




The best line of the night! PCMedic seems to be having math addition
problems. I too thank Measekite for helping keep the cost of printers
low by his ever continuing purchases of the OEM cash cow inks. Canon
thanks him too. It's a fine line between a sucker and a loyal OEM buyer
of inks, isn't it.

A very fine line. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know the game
plan of the inkjet printer manufacturers. The first clue is that for
many printer models the user can buy a NEW printer for less than he
could buy a set of replacement cartridges. I had better stop now. I
don't want to make that homework assignment too easy.

Nelson wrote:

"Michael Johnson, PE" wrote in
:



PC Medic wrote:


"Michael Johnson, PE" wrote in message
...



Frank wrote:



measekite wrote:




Canon thinks people like you are fools.


Yon may think that Canon thinks people like Burt et al are fools.
But as usual you'd be dead wrong.
"Think" is operative word here.
For sure, Canon KNOWS that people like you are the real fools who
are willing to pay for their very overpriced OEM inks and keep their
execs in very high paying salaries and great bonuses.
They depends on fools like you.
Without fools like you, who are willing to pay at least 4 times as
much for their OEM inks as compared to 3rd's, they'd have to start
discounting their overpriced OEM inks, or take a pay cut.
But as long as there are fools like you, those great salaries plus
raises and bonuses just keep on coming.
I do hope they send you a wonderful Xmas thank you card every year.
Fool!
Frank


Also, let's not forget that it's the people buying OEM ink that keeps
the price of inkjet printers low. For that, I am greatful to them.
Under the current senario I get inexpensive printers AND inexpensive
ink. This is why I don't mind that measekite buys, and promotes the
use of, OEM ink. It's good for my bank account.


I would love to here the logic you base that statement on.


Consider it your homework assignment to figure it out.





The best line of the night! PCMedic seems to be having math addition
problems. I too thank Measekite for helping keep the cost of printers
low by his ever continuing purchases of the OEM cash cow inks. Canon
thanks him too. It's a fine line between a sucker and a loyal OEM buyer
of inks, isn't it.

Nelson



I want to thank Canon for thinking I am loyal and giving me a 5 year
supply of carts. Now I have the best price and no pain in the ass.

Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:

Frank






You seem well acquainted with that stuff SHMUCK :-D




Your personality (or lack thereof) is a dead give away. :-P
Frank




Why is your tongue brown. Are you an AssEater


Your printer heads have apparently become clogged with those
expensive, overpriced, OEM inks that you exclusively use in the one
lone printer you own because my tongue is red.
No bozos!
Frankie Crankie

Michael Johnson, PE wrote:

Nelson wrote:

"Michael Johnson, PE" wrote in
:

PC Medic wrote:

"Michael Johnson, PE" wrote in message
...


Frank wrote:


measekite wrote:



Canon thinks people like you are fools.



Yon may think that Canon thinks people like Burt et al are fools.
But as usual you'd be dead wrong.
"Think" is operative word here.
For sure, Canon KNOWS that people like you are the real fools who
are willing to pay for their very overpriced OEM inks and keep their
execs in very high paying salaries and great bonuses.
They depends on fools like you.
Without fools like you, who are willing to pay at least 4 times as
much for their OEM inks as compared to 3rd's, they'd have to start
discounting their overpriced OEM inks, or take a pay cut.
But as long as there are fools like you, those great salaries plus
raises and bonuses just keep on coming.
I do hope they send you a wonderful Xmas thank you card every year.
Fool!
Frank


Also, let's not forget that it's the people buying OEM ink that keeps
the price of inkjet printers low. For that, I am greatful to them.
Under the current senario I get inexpensive printers AND inexpensive
ink. This is why I don't mind that measekite buys, and promotes the
use of, OEM ink. It's good for my bank account.



I would love to here the logic you base that statement on.


Consider it your homework assignment to figure it out.




The best line of the night! PCMedic seems to be having math addition
problems. I too thank Measekite for helping keep the cost of printers
low by his ever continuing purchases of the OEM cash cow inks. Canon
thanks him too. It's a fine line between a sucker and a loyal OEM buyer
of inks, isn't it.


A very fine line. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know the game
plan of the inkjet printer manufacturers. The first clue is that for
many printer models the user can buy a NEW printer for less than he
could buy a set of replacement cartridges. I had better stop now. I
don't want to make that homework assignment too easy.


Gees, it does not take a rocket scientist to know the game plan of the
automobile manufacturers. The first clue is that for many auto models
the user can buy a NEW car for less than he could be a new set of parts.

HAHAHAHA

measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:

Frank







You seem well acquainted with that stuff SHMUCK :-D





Your personality (or lack thereof) is a dead give away. :-P
Frank





Why is your tongue brown. Are you an AssEater



Your printer heads have apparently become clogged with those
expensive, overpriced, OEM inks that you exclusively use in the one
lone printer you own because my tongue is red.
No bozos!
Frankie Crankie

You're now slamming yourself? Great idea and a very smooth move
meser****! Nice that you finally recognized yourself for the fool you
really act like.
Thanks, saves us all the time and energy.
Frank

Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:



Frank wrote:

measekite wrote:

Frank








You seem well acquainted with that stuff SHMUCK :-D






Your personality (or lack thereof) is a dead give away. :-P
Frank






Why is your tongue brown. Are you an AssEater




Your printer heads have apparently become clogged with those
expensive, overpriced, OEM inks that you exclusively use in the one
lone printer you own because my tongue is red.
No bozos!
Frankie Crankie


You're now slamming yourself? Great idea and a very smooth move
meser****! Nice that you finally recognized yourself for the fool you
really act like.
Thanks, saves us all the time and energy.
Frankie EAT ME RAW Crankie

"measekite" wrote in message
. ..
(snip)
A very fine line. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know the game
plan of the inkjet printer manufacturers. The first clue is that for
many printer models the user can buy a NEW printer for less than he could
buy a set of replacement cartridges. I had better stop now. I don't
want to make that homework assignment too easy.


Gees, it does not take a rocket scientist to know the game plan of the
automobile manufacturers. The first clue is that for many auto models the
user can buy a NEW car for less than he could be a new set of parts.

HAHAHAHA

Poor analogy. The correct analogy would be if car manufacturers also owned
and controlled the manufacture and distribution of all gas and oil and a
tank of gas cost nearly what the new car cost. The new car would come with
a full tank of gas (like the printer with ink tanks), and when the tank
approaches empty you would have to buy the manufacturer's gas at a wildly
inflated price - nearly the price you paid for the new car with the gas tank
full. Inks and gas are consumables. Measekite, your Stanford MBA should
have prepared you better for this sort of economic analysis. If you are
talking about the cost of the product (car or printer) being less than the
sum of the cost of all the parts (car or printer) then that would be
comparable and true for both. Econ 1A at UC prepared us better than your
Stanford MBA if this is an example of what you have learned. And what is
this hahaha garbage?

measekite wrote:



Gees, it does not take a rocket scientist to know the game plan of the
automobile manufacturers. The first clue is that for many auto models
the user can buy a NEW car for less than he could be a new set of parts.

HAHAHAHA

Ha...you really are that stupid, aren't you?
Frank

Burt wrote:

"measekite" wrote in message
...
(snip)


A very fine line. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know the game
plan of the inkjet printer manufacturers. The first clue is that for
many printer models the user can buy a NEW printer for less than he could
buy a set of replacement cartridges. I had better stop now. I don't
want to make that homework assignment too easy.


Gees, it does not take a rocket scientist to know the game plan of the
automobile manufacturers. The first clue is that for many auto models the
user can buy a NEW car for less than he could be a new set of parts.

HAHAHAHA



Poor analogy. The correct analogy would be if car manufacturers also owned
and controlled the manufacture and distribution of all gas and oil and a
tank of gas cost nearly what the new car cost. The new car would come with
a full tank of gas (like the printer with ink tanks), and when the tank
approaches empty you would have to buy the manufacturer's gas at a wildly
inflated price - nearly the price you paid for the new car with the gas tank
full. Inks and gas are consumables.


But they don't old pious fart.

Measekite, your Stanford MBA should
have prepared you better for this sort of economic analysis. If you are
talking about the cost of the product (car or printer) being less than the
sum of the cost of all the parts (car or printer) then that would be
comparable and true for both. Econ 1A at UC prepared us better than your
Stanford MBA if this is an example of what you have learned. And what is
this hahaha garbage?



HAHAHA :-D :-D :-D GET IT NOW