If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
So you have an authentic XP3200+ 400FSB 11x multiplier.
Assuming the CPU is genuine (for sake of further analysis), there are a number of other components that could cause you problems: 1) Undersized power supply -- very common problem with high-performance CPUs; 2) Bad memory chips -- CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be used to stress test them. 3) Defective motherboard; 4) Bad XP install -- yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically improved the performance of my A7V880. 5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often reported to be a problem. 6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at? I think you have to eliminate all these before you conclude that the CPU is defective. I'm sure others will contribute other possibilities and ideas to my list. Best of luck "Information Scavenger" wrote in message ... The little black sticker on the side of my CPU says this: AXDA3200DKV4E Y840917700218 AQXDA0351XPFW (c) 1999 AMD Also, in one of my previous posts I said that it seemed to run stable at 2500+ but that does not appear to be the case. After running it for a few hours, I moved my mouse to interrupt the screen saver (logon screen actually, running XP Pro) and as soon as I moved the mouse, the computer rebooted. I set it back down to 1100+ (100fsb) and it seems to work still. Whats odd though, and I don't think this is normal, the WARRANTY VOID IF REMOVED sticker was not on the cpu as I would have though, but instead it was on the outside of the plastic clam shell container. Also someone asked how much I paid for it. Below is a link to the CPU/MB combo I purchased...it seems the price now is about the same as it was when I got it...about $181 for the combo. Based on previous posts I suspect that since the CPU itself in some places should be about that price, perhaps they gave me one they got at a discounted price (IE possibly incorrectly marked). Maybe I should send it back and get a replacement and then try it once with the new one. All I know is that I didn't pay nearly $200 to go down from an XP 2200+ (1.8 ghz) to an 1100+ system. http://www.partspc.com/store/product3529.html On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 18:09:54 GMT, "DonC" wrote: Take a look at this link: http://coondwc.home.comcast.net/XP3200.jpg The label at the bottom is what you're looking for. The three lines on this one a AXDA3200OKV4E 4159143270002 AQXDA0317HPM 1999 AMD Here's how to decode it: http://www.amdboard.com/amdid.html This example is a 3200 as indicated in the first entry. It was manufactured in the 17th week of 2003 as indicated in the third entry. "Dreamaker" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:04:22 -0500, Information Scavenger wrote: I am not 100% sure what the chip is supposed to look like. I haven't taken it apart yet (will in a couple hrs) but is there a link to a good picture you could direct me to so I can compare once I get it out? Thanks for all the help so far...I really appreciate it. If its not for the xp3200 stiker your looking for, you wont see anything because all xp are made with a lock-up system ( inside) that prevent you from ( in exemple) buying a xp1200 (a cheap one) and use it as a 3200. Maybe you've just buy a barton core that runs at 333fsb and is rated to be a 3200 Not the one that runs at 400. It simple as that cause you've said that it was'nt stable at 400. Anyway amdxp 400fsb 3200 are selled at 260$ can here that would be 191$ us. how much did you pay for it. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Information Scavenger wrote:
Also I'm not sure how accurate or how much help this will be, but I downloaded CPUZ from www.cpuid.com and here is the output: (Keep in mind that its currently underclocked to 1100+ in order for me to be able to function without continuous and interrmittent reboots and snip Have you tried relaxing your BIOS memory settings at 200mhz and then running Memtest86? Think they may just be a little to tight for 200mhz but might work OK at 100mhz. I would try setting them for 7-3-3-2.5 to start. Rob |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I guess the short answer is no. I am not quite sure how to "relax" the settings. I do not have memtest86 so I have not stress tested the RAM (but its brand new RAM because I thought that was the problem at first so I'd hope that isn't it, although I know I shouldn't rule it completely out). If you could direct me to the correct place I'll give it a go. So far, every time I set it to 200mhz FSB I can't even get into Windows without it powering off and then powering back up immediately forces it to shut off and then the third power on it will stay on, but its underclocked itself back to 100 which is the only thing it seems to work good with. On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:25:45 GMT, Rob wrote: Information Scavenger wrote: Also I'm not sure how accurate or how much help this will be, but I downloaded CPUZ from www.cpuid.com and here is the output: (Keep in mind that its currently underclocked to 1100+ in order for me to be able to function without continuous and interrmittent reboots and snip Have you tried relaxing your BIOS memory settings at 200mhz and then running Memtest86? Think they may just be a little to tight for 200mhz but might work OK at 100mhz. I would try setting them for 7-3-3-2.5 to start. Rob ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the
line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a bit larger than most (450 or 500 I've seen a lot of) so unless its bad, I'd think it shouldn't be undersized. The only thing I have in my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1. I have 5 different memory chips I've tried (two different pairs of identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not the issue...that rules out number 2. Now for number 3...defective MB, thats not something I'd hoped to hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a computer with...I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that MB and see what happens. I would like to rule out number 4...I wor extremely hard to keep my copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care of my OS. I don't install programs I don't need (heck, even if its one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine...but this install I am running with now is relatively brand new...the only thing thats been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and MS Office. Maybe a graphics program...it has worked flawlessly for months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its underclocked... For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system components...the only thing that isn't built onto my MB besides the HD and RAM and CPU of course is the video card...and I have tried 3 different video cards all with the same results...so I'd like to possibly rule that out. How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I'm sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79 degrees mostly...occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever been above that, I just wasn't looking. The thermal compound I used was the one that they sent with the CPU...I suppose its possible that it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven't tried...didn't even think it was a culprit actually. Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I'll try the other one tomorrow and see what happens. I'd try it today but I've about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going to work...and I don't want to sit here poking at it for an hour...I may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now and take tomorrow to work on the MB. 1) Undersized power supply -- very common problem with high-performance CPUs; 2) Bad memory chips -- CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be used to stress test them. 3) Defective motherboard; 4) Bad XP install -- yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically improved the performance of my A7V880. 5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often reported to be a problem. 6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Your power supply certainly sounds much more than ample : )
As far as memory goes, definitely do your tests using only one stick at a time. That's all you need and it reduces the possibilities of one stick being bad. Do a google search on memtest86 and you'll easily find a place to download it. Follow the instructions to create a floppy. Boot from the floppy and let memtest86 run as long as possible. As far as Windows goes, I also keep my version as clean as possible. However, when I installed my new A7V880 motherboard, I had to install the accompanying drivers and drivers for my new Radeon 9200. Soon found out the drivers that came with the MB were generally buggy -- version 1.0 -- so I had to download and install new drivers. Ditto for the Radeon drivers. By the time I got done, my OS was a mess. Took 3 minutes to boot. A clean install of Win XP solved all my problems. Download ASUS Probe from www.asus.com to monitor your CPU temperature. You should always run a "motherboard monitor" with a new MB/CPU installation. Just to make sure you don't fry your CPU and that your voltages are correct. I used to use MotherboardMonitor 5 but it doesn't support the A7V880 : ( However it does support your board so look for it using google. Supposedly "misery loves company." My similar battle has been trying to get my DVD writer working on my XP SP2 machine. Worked well before I installed SP2 so I concluded that had to be the problem. I thought I confirmed that by installing it in a Win ME machine I keep for the grandkids. It worked! Proof positive! Next step was to install it in my wife's XP machine with SP1 installed. It sorta worked but then it also occasionally failed. So maybe SP2 isn't the problem. This battle has spanned several weeks. Today I received a new Optorite 12X DVD writer (from newegg $60 shipped) and, like magic, it works flawlessly! Tons of more capabilities like DVD+/-R, dual layer and HD-Burn (can burn 80% more onto a CDR 1.26GB to 1.44GB). So now I have this old (8/22/04) 8X DVD writer to ponder. Best of luck "Information Scavenger" wrote in message ... I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a bit larger than most (450 or 500 I've seen a lot of) so unless its bad, I'd think it shouldn't be undersized. The only thing I have in my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1. I have 5 different memory chips I've tried (two different pairs of identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not the issue...that rules out number 2. Now for number 3...defective MB, thats not something I'd hoped to hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a computer with...I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that MB and see what happens. I would like to rule out number 4...I wor extremely hard to keep my copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care of my OS. I don't install programs I don't need (heck, even if its one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine...but this install I am running with now is relatively brand new...the only thing thats been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and MS Office. Maybe a graphics program...it has worked flawlessly for months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its underclocked... For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system components...the only thing that isn't built onto my MB besides the HD and RAM and CPU of course is the video card...and I have tried 3 different video cards all with the same results...so I'd like to possibly rule that out. How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I'm sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79 degrees mostly...occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever been above that, I just wasn't looking. The thermal compound I used was the one that they sent with the CPU...I suppose its possible that it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven't tried...didn't even think it was a culprit actually. Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I'll try the other one tomorrow and see what happens. I'd try it today but I've about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going to work...and I don't want to sit here poking at it for an hour...I may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now and take tomorrow to work on the MB. 1) Undersized power supply -- very common problem with high-performance CPUs; 2) Bad memory chips -- CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be used to stress test them. 3) Defective motherboard; 4) Bad XP install -- yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically improved the performance of my A7V880. 5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often reported to be a problem. 6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Information Scavenger wrote:
I guess the short answer is no. I am not quite sure how to "relax" the settings. I do not have memtest86 so I have not stress tested the RAM (but its brand new RAM because I thought that was the problem at first so I'd hope that isn't it, although I know I shouldn't rule it completely out). If you could direct me to the correct place I'll give it a go. So far, every time I set it to 200mhz FSB I can't even get into Windows without it powering off and then powering back up immediately forces it to shut off and then the third power on it will stay on, but its underclocked itself back to 100 which is the only thing it seems to work good with. After you've downloaded Memtest86 and installed it to a floppy, go into the BIOS, to the same page where you set the FSB. Below there is a setting for Memory Freq set it to 100%, then set Memory Timing to User Defined. From there you should be able to set the next 4 settings to 7-3-3-2.5 respectively. You should have the FSB set to 200. Further down the page is a setting for AGP Frequency, set it to 66mhz as auto doesn't always work! Then run Memtest to check for stability. HTH! Rob |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
I got Asus Probe and it says my CPU is running currently (with the
compound that came with my CPU) at 42c (107f) and the MB is running at 28c (82f). I don't know if those are normal or not but the probe reports all as normal. I am going to look for the MOTHERBOARD MONITOR also and see if it reports anything differently...and I'll let memtest86 do its thing and see what happens...by the time I do that and play with my this other MB I should be all set (hopefully) but will post one way or another. I work in IT (hands on computer work for a couple years back) and every time I run into a problem with my own PC's like this it sometimes takes a while for me to figure it out - mainly because only the extremely annoying cases pop up (which I should probably be thankful for because after tackling something like this, I feel like I can take on any other problem with more confidence that whatever it is will most likely be conquered hehe... On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 23:57:00 GMT, "DonC" wrote: Your power supply certainly sounds much more than ample : ) As far as memory goes, definitely do your tests using only one stick at a time. That's all you need and it reduces the possibilities of one stick being bad. Do a google search on memtest86 and you'll easily find a place to download it. Follow the instructions to create a floppy. Boot from the floppy and let memtest86 run as long as possible. As far as Windows goes, I also keep my version as clean as possible. However, when I installed my new A7V880 motherboard, I had to install the accompanying drivers and drivers for my new Radeon 9200. Soon found out the drivers that came with the MB were generally buggy -- version 1.0 -- so I had to download and install new drivers. Ditto for the Radeon drivers. By the time I got done, my OS was a mess. Took 3 minutes to boot. A clean install of Win XP solved all my problems. Download ASUS Probe from www.asus.com to monitor your CPU temperature. You should always run a "motherboard monitor" with a new MB/CPU installation. Just to make sure you don't fry your CPU and that your voltages are correct. I used to use MotherboardMonitor 5 but it doesn't support the A7V880 : ( However it does support your board so look for it using google. Supposedly "misery loves company." My similar battle has been trying to get my DVD writer working on my XP SP2 machine. Worked well before I installed SP2 so I concluded that had to be the problem. I thought I confirmed that by installing it in a Win ME machine I keep for the grandkids. It worked! Proof positive! Next step was to install it in my wife's XP machine with SP1 installed. It sorta worked but then it also occasionally failed. So maybe SP2 isn't the problem. This battle has spanned several weeks. Today I received a new Optorite 12X DVD writer (from newegg $60 shipped) and, like magic, it works flawlessly! Tons of more capabilities like DVD+/-R, dual layer and HD-Burn (can burn 80% more onto a CDR 1.26GB to 1.44GB). So now I have this old (8/22/04) 8X DVD writer to ponder. Best of luck "Information Scavenger" wrote in message .. . I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a bit larger than most (450 or 500 I've seen a lot of) so unless its bad, I'd think it shouldn't be undersized. The only thing I have in my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1. I have 5 different memory chips I've tried (two different pairs of identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not the issue...that rules out number 2. Now for number 3...defective MB, thats not something I'd hoped to hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a computer with...I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that MB and see what happens. I would like to rule out number 4...I wor extremely hard to keep my copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care of my OS. I don't install programs I don't need (heck, even if its one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine...but this install I am running with now is relatively brand new...the only thing thats been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and MS Office. Maybe a graphics program...it has worked flawlessly for months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its underclocked... For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system components...the only thing that isn't built onto my MB besides the HD and RAM and CPU of course is the video card...and I have tried 3 different video cards all with the same results...so I'd like to possibly rule that out. How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I'm sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79 degrees mostly...occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever been above that, I just wasn't looking. The thermal compound I used was the one that they sent with the CPU...I suppose its possible that it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven't tried...didn't even think it was a culprit actually. Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I'll try the other one tomorrow and see what happens. I'd try it today but I've about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going to work...and I don't want to sit here poking at it for an hour...I may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now and take tomorrow to work on the MB. 1) Undersized power supply -- very common problem with high-performance CPUs; 2) Bad memory chips -- CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be used to stress test them. 3) Defective motherboard; 4) Bad XP install -- yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically improved the performance of my A7V880. 5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often reported to be a problem. 6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Ok I'm not sure if its fixed yet or not, but I did exactly what you
said below and relaxed the memory settings and now for the first time I am logged into Windows running at 3200+. Prior to this, each and every attempt to go up to 3200+ has resulted in a reboot before I would even get to the logon screen and then a few power ups later it would reset the BIOS to defaults and then work OK (just underclocked). I'll keep you all posted still. On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:17:16 GMT, Rob wrote: Information Scavenger wrote: I guess the short answer is no. I am not quite sure how to "relax" the settings. I do not have memtest86 so I have not stress tested the RAM (but its brand new RAM because I thought that was the problem at first so I'd hope that isn't it, although I know I shouldn't rule it completely out). If you could direct me to the correct place I'll give it a go. So far, every time I set it to 200mhz FSB I can't even get into Windows without it powering off and then powering back up immediately forces it to shut off and then the third power on it will stay on, but its underclocked itself back to 100 which is the only thing it seems to work good with. After you've downloaded Memtest86 and installed it to a floppy, go into the BIOS, to the same page where you set the FSB. Below there is a setting for Memory Freq set it to 100%, then set Memory Timing to User Defined. From there you should be able to set the next 4 settings to 7-3-3-2.5 respectively. You should have the FSB set to 200. Further down the page is a setting for AGP Frequency, set it to 66mhz as auto doesn't always work! Then run Memtest to check for stability. HTH! Rob ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Your temperatures are good. 107f is lukewarm water; OK for activating yeast
(either beer or bread) so it can't hurt your CPU. Of course I assume you're running the CPU at 1.1Ghz so these temperatures will rise when you get it up to full 2.2GHz speed. The maximum die temperature is something like 85C but I'd get antsy above 55C. Actually much above 45C gets my attention. I'm currently at 41C with a 2.167GHz 3000+. "Information Scavenger" wrote in message ... I got Asus Probe and it says my CPU is running currently (with the compound that came with my CPU) at 42c (107f) and the MB is running at 28c (82f). I don't know if those are normal or not but the probe reports all as normal. I am going to look for the MOTHERBOARD MONITOR also and see if it reports anything differently...and I'll let memtest86 do its thing and see what happens...by the time I do that and play with my this other MB I should be all set (hopefully) but will post one way or another. I work in IT (hands on computer work for a couple years back) and every time I run into a problem with my own PC's like this it sometimes takes a while for me to figure it out - mainly because only the extremely annoying cases pop up (which I should probably be thankful for because after tackling something like this, I feel like I can take on any other problem with more confidence that whatever it is will most likely be conquered hehe... On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 23:57:00 GMT, "DonC" wrote: Your power supply certainly sounds much more than ample : ) As far as memory goes, definitely do your tests using only one stick at a time. That's all you need and it reduces the possibilities of one stick being bad. Do a google search on memtest86 and you'll easily find a place to download it. Follow the instructions to create a floppy. Boot from the floppy and let memtest86 run as long as possible. As far as Windows goes, I also keep my version as clean as possible. However, when I installed my new A7V880 motherboard, I had to install the accompanying drivers and drivers for my new Radeon 9200. Soon found out the drivers that came with the MB were generally buggy -- version 1.0 -- so I had to download and install new drivers. Ditto for the Radeon drivers. By the time I got done, my OS was a mess. Took 3 minutes to boot. A clean install of Win XP solved all my problems. Download ASUS Probe from www.asus.com to monitor your CPU temperature. You should always run a "motherboard monitor" with a new MB/CPU installation. Just to make sure you don't fry your CPU and that your voltages are correct. I used to use MotherboardMonitor 5 but it doesn't support the A7V880 : ( However it does support your board so look for it using google. Supposedly "misery loves company." My similar battle has been trying to get my DVD writer working on my XP SP2 machine. Worked well before I installed SP2 so I concluded that had to be the problem. I thought I confirmed that by installing it in a Win ME machine I keep for the grandkids. It worked! Proof positive! Next step was to install it in my wife's XP machine with SP1 installed. It sorta worked but then it also occasionally failed. So maybe SP2 isn't the problem. This battle has spanned several weeks. Today I received a new Optorite 12X DVD writer (from newegg $60 shipped) and, like magic, it works flawlessly! Tons of more capabilities like DVD+/-R, dual layer and HD-Burn (can burn 80% more onto a CDR 1.26GB to 1.44GB). So now I have this old (8/22/04) 8X DVD writer to ponder. Best of luck "Information Scavenger" wrote in message . .. I have a POWERMAGIC 600 watt power supply (I ordered it top of the line about a year ago when I did my last upgrade) and I know 600 is a bit larger than most (450 or 500 I've seen a lot of) so unless its bad, I'd think it shouldn't be undersized. The only thing I have in my system is a single 160 gig WD hard drive and a GeForce FX5700 256mb video card and one IDE DVD Burner. Everything else is built onto the MB, so it should be able to handle it. That rules out number 1. I have 5 different memory chips I've tried (two different pairs of identical 512mb chips (though one is 166 and the newest ones I just got are 200) plus another 133 512mb chip. FWIW no matter which chips I have in (taking into consideration not to overclock beyond what the RAM is capable of handling) none of them run this CPU at anything other than 1100+ so I am going to say that bad memory is probably not the issue...that rules out number 2. Now for number 3...defective MB, thats not something I'd hoped to hear, but luckily (or unfortunately) I have another identical MB which I just received about 2 weeks ago I was going to build my daughter a computer with...I guess before I do that I could put my stuff on that MB and see what happens. I would like to rule out number 4...I wor extremely hard to keep my copy of windows extremely efficient and like to think I take good care of my OS. I don't install programs I don't need (heck, even if its one I would like to try, I usually install it on another PC and once I am satisfied with the results, I put it on mine...but this install I am running with now is relatively brand new...the only thing thats been added sine it was done is a newsreader, my IM chat programs, and MS Office. Maybe a graphics program...it has worked flawlessly for months (and still does, even with this hardware) if its underclocked... For number 5, refer to the above to see my additonal system components...the only thing that isn't built onto my MB besides the HD and RAM and CPU of course is the video card...and I have tried 3 different video cards all with the same results...so I'd like to possibly rule that out. How can I tell what the temp is on my CPU? My case has an LCD display unit in the front which has the internal case temperature, but I'm sure thats not the CPU temp. That temperature ranges from 74 to 79 degrees mostly...occasionally I have seen it reach 80 but if its ever been above that, I just wasn't looking. The thermal compound I used was the one that they sent with the CPU...I suppose its possible that it could be inadequate and I do have some more I haven't tried...didn't even think it was a culprit actually. Sorry for the long post (mainly thinking out loud) but I will say that the most likely case would hopefully be the motherboard. I'll try the other one tomorrow and see what happens. I'd try it today but I've about had it and know its going to take me about an hour or so to fully swap them and get it up and running enough to see if its going to work...and I don't want to sit here poking at it for an hour...I may just play a couple of my highly neglected games at 1100mhz for now and take tomorrow to work on the MB. 1) Undersized power supply -- very common problem with high-performance CPUs; 2) Bad memory chips -- CPUZ will show you the SPD rating. MEMTEST86 can be used to stress test them. 3) Defective motherboard; 4) Bad XP install -- yes it can happen. A clean install dramatically improved the performance of my A7V880. 5) Conflict with MB and components. For example, a Radeon 9600 is often reported to be a problem. 6) Inadequate thermal cooling. What temperature is your CPU running at? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Well so far, as of my last post, I have been running for almost a week
solid (half of that was in a game stress testing my system) and I have not had any strange or unexpected reboot. I believe the problem was my video card. After I took my newest video card out and put my old FX5200 back in, it seems to be working fine. I got an RMA and sent the new one back for return but I am fairly confident that should take care of it. Thanks for all the help guys and if something else happens or that isn't the fix, I'll post another follow-up. On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 22:54:32 -0500, Information Scavenger wrote: Ok I'm not sure if its fixed yet or not, but I did exactly what you said below and relaxed the memory settings and now for the first time I am logged into Windows running at 3200+. Prior to this, each and every attempt to go up to 3200+ has resulted in a reboot before I would even get to the logon screen and then a few power ups later it would reset the BIOS to defaults and then work OK (just underclocked). I'll keep you all posted still. On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:17:16 GMT, Rob wrote: Information Scavenger wrote: I guess the short answer is no. I am not quite sure how to "relax" the settings. I do not have memtest86 so I have not stress tested the RAM (but its brand new RAM because I thought that was the problem at first so I'd hope that isn't it, although I know I shouldn't rule it completely out). If you could direct me to the correct place I'll give it a go. So far, every time I set it to 200mhz FSB I can't even get into Windows without it powering off and then powering back up immediately forces it to shut off and then the third power on it will stay on, but its underclocked itself back to 100 which is the only thing it seems to work good with. After you've downloaded Memtest86 and installed it to a floppy, go into the BIOS, to the same page where you set the FSB. Below there is a setting for Memory Freq set it to 100%, then set Memory Timing to User Defined. From there you should be able to set the next 4 settings to 7-3-3-2.5 respectively. You should have the FSB set to 200. Further down the page is a setting for AGP Frequency, set it to 66mhz as auto doesn't always work! Then run Memtest to check for stability. HTH! Rob ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|