If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
on Sun January 25 2004 12:05 pm, Conor decided to enlighten us with:
In article , says... Cheers on you decision to avoid French products. I started to go back to Red Hat possibly due to the whole deal with the French/German/Russian thing, but I thought I'd wait for Fedora to mature a bit before I tried it. Maybe by Core 3 I'll give it a look. Besides, I really like SuSE... "I started to go back to Red Hat possibly due to the whole deal with the French/German/Russian thing" ....err better forget SuSE then because its a German distribution. That was my point. I have been a SuSE user, but I've considered going to Red Hat/Fedora because of the whole debacle. However, Fedora Core 1 is in its infancy, and I do like SuSE a lot. -- Big Daddy Ruel Smith My SuSE Linux machine uptime: 8:25pm up 49 days 4:03, 2 users, load average: 0.28, 0.90, 0.89 My Windows XP machine uptime: Something less... |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
on Sun January 25 2004 12:05 pm, JAD decided to enlighten us with:
hmmm nvidia does have the advantage, as one driver nearly fits all...but not the 'latest' cards from the major suppliers have a xinux' compatible driver that I have seen.... From nVidia's site (http://www.nvidia.com/object linux_display_ia32_1.0-5328): "Linux Display Driver - IA32 Version: 1.0-5328 Operating System: Linux IA32 Release Date: December 22, 2003 Release Highlights Supports latest GeForce FX and Quadro FX GPUs ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Added support for UBB and FSAA Stereo. Improved GLXPixamp support. Added support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0. Added support for GLX_SGI_swap_control. Reduced CPU usage when OpenGL applications are syncing to vblank." -- Big Daddy Ruel Smith My SuSE Linux machine uptime: 8:27pm up 49 days 4:06, 2 users, load average: 0.20, 0.60, 0.78 My Windows XP machine uptime: Something less... |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
on Sun January 25 2004 4:53 pm, Anon decided to enlighten us with:
It's a marketing scam. Many consumer items in the U.S. (especially electronics and computer components) are advertised as costing $____ "after rebate". Let's say a DVD player is $30 US after rebate. So you pay sixty bucks for it, and then you have to mail in for the rebate. To send away for the rebate, you need an ORIGINAL sales receipt, and an ORIGINAL UPC CODE (cut off the box). Plus, you need to fill in a form of course. You have to send all this information away by mail. It's a scam, as most rebates are rejected, even if they are claimed correctly. The most common scam is that you did everything right, but the rebate processing company will claim (incorrectly) that you didn't send in the UPC code. Thus the rebate is rejected. What it boils down to is that it is a way to trick U.S. consumers into paying more for certain items by promising to give them a discount AFTER THEY BUY something, and then deliberately failing to honor that promise. You'll see lots of people claim that they have no problem claiming rebates. These are the same people who SHOULD be purchasing lottery tickets on a regular basis. When more than 50% of rebates are automatically rejected, someone who's never had a problem claiming a rebate obviously has luck on their side. -Dave I recently bought a WD 120 GB drive with 8MB cache with a $60 rebate and the rebate was in my mail in a couple of weeks! -- Big Daddy Ruel Smith My SuSE Linux machine uptime: 8:32pm up 49 days 4:11, 2 users, load average: 0.32, 0.47, 0.67 My Windows XP machine uptime: Something less... |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
interesting as I was looking at the latest offerings of Nvid off the self at BB....no mention of xinux on the box...I'll re-examine
that and grab some model numbers....also would like to see/or hear from someone on a working system incorporating this driver. Everything looks good on paper, and many xinux 'drivers', have been less than perfect, with many features lost/lamed. "Ruel Smith (Big Daddy)" wrote in message ... on Sun January 25 2004 12:05 pm, JAD decided to enlighten us with: hmmm nvidia does have the advantage, as one driver nearly fits all...but not the 'latest' cards from the major suppliers have a xinux' compatible driver that I have seen.... From nVidia's site (http://www.nvidia.com/object linux_display_ia32_1.0-5328): "Linux Display Driver - IA32 Version: 1.0-5328 Operating System: Linux IA32 Release Date: December 22, 2003 Release Highlights Supports latest GeForce FX and Quadro FX GPUs ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Added support for UBB and FSAA Stereo. Improved GLXPixamp support. Added support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0. Added support for GLX_SGI_swap_control. Reduced CPU usage when OpenGL applications are syncing to vblank." -- Big Daddy Ruel Smith My SuSE Linux machine uptime: 8:27pm up 49 days 4:06, 2 users, load average: 0.20, 0.60, 0.78 My Windows XP machine uptime: Something less... |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
I recently bought a WD 120 GB drive with 8MB cache with a $60 rebate and the rebate was in my mail in a couple of weeks! Quick, buy a powerball ticket before your luck runs out. -Dave |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
I've never been rejected for a rebate claim. Only shop enough to make
sure the price after rebate is worth the trouble. Anon wrote: In other words, pay a hundred bucks for a sixty buck drive, mail in the rebate, do EVERYTHING RIGHT, get the rebate rejected, end up paying forty bucks more than you should. No thanks. -Dave What is this whole rebate thing? I live in the UK, I'm guessing its a US thing right? Steve It's a marketing scam. Many consumer items in the U.S. (especially electronics and computer components) are advertised as costing $____ "after rebate". Let's say a DVD player is $30 US after rebate. So you pay sixty bucks for it, and then you have to mail in for the rebate. To send away for the rebate, you need an ORIGINAL sales receipt, and an ORIGINAL UPC CODE (cut off the box). Plus, you need to fill in a form of course. You have to send all this information away by mail. It's a scam, as most rebates are rejected, even if they are claimed correctly. The most common scam is that you did everything right, but the rebate processing company will claim (incorrectly) that you didn't send in the UPC code. Thus the rebate is rejected. What it boils down to is that it is a way to trick U.S. consumers into paying more for certain items by promising to give them a discount AFTER THEY BUY something, and then deliberately failing to honor that promise. You'll see lots of people claim that they have no problem claiming rebates. These are the same people who SHOULD be purchasing lottery tickets on a regular basis. When more than 50% of rebates are automatically rejected, someone who's never had a problem claiming a rebate obviously has luck on their side. -Dave |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"Anon" wrote in message ws.com...
In other words, pay a hundred bucks for a sixty buck drive, mail in the rebate, do EVERYTHING RIGHT, get the rebate rejected, end up paying forty bucks more than you should. No thanks. -Dave What is this whole rebate thing? I live in the UK, I'm guessing its a US thing right? Steve It's a marketing scam. Many consumer items in the U.S. (especially electronics and computer components) are advertised as costing $____ "after rebate". Let's say a DVD player is $30 US after rebate. So you pay sixty bucks for it, and then you have to mail in for the rebate. To send away for the rebate, you need an ORIGINAL sales receipt, and an ORIGINAL UPC CODE (cut off the box). Plus, you need to fill in a form of course. You have to send all this information away by mail. It's a scam, as most rebates are rejected, even if they are claimed correctly. The most common scam is that you did everything right, but the rebate processing company will claim (incorrectly) that you didn't send in the UPC code. Thus the rebate is rejected. What it boils down to is that it is a way to trick U.S. consumers into paying more for certain items by promising to give them a discount AFTER THEY BUY something, and then deliberately failing to honor that promise. You'll see lots of people claim that they have no problem claiming rebates. These are the same people who SHOULD be purchasing lottery tickets on a regular basis. When more than 50% of rebates are automatically rejected, someone who's never had a problem claiming a rebate obviously has luck on their side. -Dave And here all this time I should have been buying Lotto tickets cause I must be very lucky with all 10 out of 10 of my rebates honored :-) |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"Anon" wrote in message s.com... I recently bought a WD 120 GB drive with 8MB cache with a $60 rebate and the rebate was in my mail in a couple of weeks! Quick, buy a powerball ticket before your luck runs out. -Dave I dunno...... I recently purchased a big-screen HDTV, Dolby receiver, subwoofer, new Hitachi LCD monitor and a video card. All with mail-in rebates. Got checks totaling over $400 US in the mail the last two weeks. If they were that bad, someone would be on their collective asses for offering these. Large, well established companies are NOT going to use false advertising to sell their products. Granted, there are probably a very few unscrupulous companies out there, but they are in the minority. Ed --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.567 / Virus Database: 358 - Release Date: 1/24/2004 |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
on Sun January 25 2004 8:43 pm, JAD decided to enlighten us with:
interesting as I was looking at the latest offerings of Nvid off the self at BB....no mention of xinux on the box...I'll re-examine that and grab some model numbers....also would like to see/or hear from someone on a working system incorporating this driver. Everything looks good on paper, and many xinux 'drivers', have been less than perfect, with many features lost/lamed. No box has Linux support on it as hardware OEM's consider Linux too small a market to make that big a deal over. Features "lost/lamed"? Give evidence... -- Big Daddy Ruel Smith My SuSE Linux machine uptime: 6:02am up 49 days 13:40, 2 users, load average: 0.89, 0.35, 0.12 My Windows XP machine uptime: Something less... |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Features "lost/lamed"? Give evidence...
your kidding right? your knowledgeable in nux, why are you asking for evidence...that's a common "give' when using full featured hardware with nux, something's don't work. What? you want a list of all hardware that doesn't have all its features available? You can work on that yourself. "Ruel Smith (Big Daddy)" wrote in message ... on Sun January 25 2004 8:43 pm, JAD decided to enlighten us with: interesting as I was looking at the latest offerings of Nvid off the self at BB....no mention of xinux on the box...I'll re-examine that and grab some model numbers....also would like to see/or hear from someone on a working system incorporating this driver. Everything looks good on paper, and many xinux 'drivers', have been less than perfect, with many features lost/lamed. No box has Linux support on it as hardware OEM's consider Linux too small a market to make that big a deal over. -- Big Daddy Ruel Smith My SuSE Linux machine uptime: 6:02am up 49 days 13:40, 2 users, load average: 0.89, 0.35, 0.12 My Windows XP machine uptime: Something less... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Linux AMD64 | Roger Treece | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | May 6th 04 04:27 PM |
AIX versus SUN and Linux, best price performance ? | Frank van de Pol | General | 0 | January 28th 04 09:19 PM |
Intel backs linux fund against SCO | stacey | General | 0 | January 13th 04 03:29 AM |
Qs about motherboard/components for homebuild AMD system | Milt Epstein | Homebuilt PC's | 18 | September 27th 03 05:10 PM |