If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A converted person...
After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi
Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Radeon 9800 pro is a 256 bit card @ 128 bit it is not a pro. I have a
9800 np ( still 256 bit ) and it can run better than 75 fps @ maximum settings with 1280 x 1024 - depending on how your system is set up... "Humga" wrote in message ... After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 7/18/2004 5:28 AM Humga brightened our day with:
After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! Nope, I doubt if even an X800 XT or any other card out there would never drop below 75 fps in UT2K4 at max settings and 1280x1024. Here are results from a default set of UMark benches run at high quality settings at 1280x1024 on my 256 bit 9800 Pro. If you're talking about a 128 bit 9800 Pro the results wouldn't be as good. These are done with the latest, 4.7 based omega drivers map| | |details|resolution|minimum|average|maximum|score AS-FallenCity|12|High|1280x1024|9.796845|48.969612|12 9.152451|49.392334| BR-Slaughterhouse|12|High|1280x1024|28.404959|79.2860 64|149.019012|79.610855| CTF-MoonDragon|12|High|1280x1024|17.668022|71.335770|1 38.543518|71.957077| DM-Inferno|12|High|1280x1024|26.716715|52.714905|128. 801254|52.897240| DOM-Ruination|12|High|1280x1024|11.782466|51.380604|11 7.383011|51.323505| ONS-Dawn|12|High|1280x1024|12.793468|61.844845|110.733 215|62.054909| These are done at 1024x768, and are closer to averaging 75 fps AS-FallenCity|12|High|1024x768|12.841086|57.527454|13 0.635208|57.999462| BR-Slaughterhouse|12|High|1024x768|34.120125|93.91161 3|148.877686|94.695198| CTF-MoonDragon|12|High|1024x768|18.073523|87.756096|15 3.498322|88.029022| DM-Inferno|12|High|1024x768|18.247566|66.418480|184.0 58685|66.915794| DOM-Ruination|12|High|1024x768|24.812656|74.275131|134 .440567|74.866737| ONS-Dawn|12|High|1024x768|11.887056|71.433327|110.6057 97|72.036560| __________ I've had a Radeon 9800 Pro for about three weeks now (Built By ATI, paid $199) and matched with an upgrade to 1 Gb of RAM (done last week) I've been incredibly happy with its performance. From what I've read you should avoid getting any 9800 Pro that only has a 128 bit bus, they're rip-offs. -- "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." - Inigo Montoya Steve [Inglo] HES PORN |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Humga wrote:
After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Dunno. But the 128bit card is crap (it's the 9800se) - spend the extra on a 256bit card (pro or standard). You will likely see something like twice the speed in many games, for something like 10% of the cost. Ben -- A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups. I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"newsgroups.bellsouth.net" wrote in message ... The Radeon 9800 pro is a 256 bit card @ 128 bit it is not a pro. I have a 9800 np ( still 256 bit ) and it can run better than 75 fps @ maximum settings with 1280 x 1024 - depending on how your system is set up... "Humga" wrote in message ... After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! SO this is not a good card? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=47511 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Humga" wrote in message ... SO this is not a good card? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=47511 Here's some comprehensive testing: http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...charts-03.html The "R 9800 Pro" clearly isn't the "R 9800 Pro 256" SO must be the 128 one. And the R Pro isn't that bad after all compared to the 256 version |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Humga wrote:
"newsgroups.bellsouth.net" wrote in message ... The Radeon 9800 pro is a 256 bit card @ 128 bit it is not a pro. I have a 9800 np ( still 256 bit ) and it can run better than 75 fps @ maximum settings with 1280 x 1024 - depending on how your system is set up... "Humga" wrote in message ... After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! SO this is not a good card? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=47511 According to this document: http://www.sapphiretech.com/press/128-bit-9800.pdf The part numbers are different and hence that is a 256bit, 128MB card and therefore good. Ben -- A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups. I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Humga wrote:
"Humga" wrote in message ... SO this is not a good card? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=47511 Here's some comprehensive testing: http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...charts-03.html The "R 9800 Pro" clearly isn't the "R 9800 Pro 256" SO must be the 128 one. And the R Pro isn't that bad after all compared to the 256 version OK, can everybody stop confusing BUS WIDTH in BITS with MEMORY SIZE in MEGABYTES, please. Ben -- A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups. I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Ben Pope" wrote in message ... Humga wrote: "newsgroups.bellsouth.net" wrote in message ... The Radeon 9800 pro is a 256 bit card @ 128 bit it is not a pro. I have a 9800 np ( still 256 bit ) and it can run better than 75 fps @ maximum settings with 1280 x 1024 - depending on how your system is set up... "Humga" wrote in message ... After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! SO this is not a good card? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=47511 According to this document: http://www.sapphiretech.com/press/128-bit-9800.pdf The part numbers are different and hence that is a 256bit, 128MB card and therefore good. Thanks I actually ordered it before posting in here! You've made by day...I lost a bit of sleep last night Yes, I did mean 128MB Rad PRO not...128 bit BUS. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Humga" wrote in message ... "Ben Pope" wrote in message ... Humga wrote: "newsgroups.bellsouth.net" wrote in message ... The Radeon 9800 pro is a 256 bit card @ 128 bit it is not a pro. I have a 9800 np ( still 256 bit ) and it can run better than 75 fps @ maximum settings with 1280 x 1024 - depending on how your system is set up... "Humga" wrote in message ... After years of nVidia finally I decided to switch to ATi Could someone please tell me if the *Radeon Pro 9800* (128Bit) can run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or higher; with not less than 75 FPS? Thanks! SO this is not a good card? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/produ...duct_uid=47511 According to this document: http://www.sapphiretech.com/press/128-bit-9800.pdf The part numbers are different and hence that is a 256bit, 128MB card and therefore good. Thanks I actually ordered it before posting in here! You've made by day...I lost a bit of sleep last night Yes, I did mean 128MB Rad PRO not...128 bit BUS. Sorry for the sleepless night, but you did say 128 bit... I had a Gigabyte 9800 pro before I broke it ( moving from one pc to another - I dropped it... Long story, but it got a static shock ). The ATI 9800 np is almost as nice, I burned the rom on it to ATI 9800 pro - the only difference being the chip voltages - so that I could run the core at stock 9800 pro speed. Some people were lucky enough to get 9800 nps with pro mem speeds. Eh... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Happy Birthday America | SST | Overclocking | 333 | November 27th 03 07:54 PM |
Happy Birthday America | SST | Overclocking AMD Processors | 326 | November 27th 03 07:54 PM |
Happy Birthday America | SST | Ati Videocards | 336 | November 27th 03 07:54 PM |
The Constitution of the United States | SST | Overclocking AMD Processors | 66 | August 7th 03 05:05 PM |