A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

best drivers for ti4200



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 15th 04, 01:36 AM
warlord716
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default best drivers for ti4200

Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats the
best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the newest ones are
more optimized for the fx cards...

thanks in advance


  #2  
Old May 15th 04, 06:56 AM
Bora Ugurlu
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

warlord716 warlord716@ wrote:
Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats the
best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the newest ones are
more optimized for the fx cards...

thanks in advance


I suggest you to stay with the ones you have.

I have 45.23, and tried recently 56.72 WHQL ones. I had a strange mouse
cursor problem with it (Logitech MX 510) and no visible improvements. so
I went back to 45.23 again.
  #3  
Old May 15th 04, 04:37 PM
BK24
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bora Ugurlu" wrote in message
...
warlord716 warlord716@ wrote:
Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats

the
best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the newest ones

are
more optimized for the fx cards...

thanks in advance


I suggest you to stay with the ones you have.

I have 45.23, and tried recently 56.72 WHQL ones. I had a strange mouse
cursor problem with it (Logitech MX 510) and no visible improvements. so
I went back to 45.23 again.


45.23's here as well. Work good with BFV so...


  #4  
Old May 15th 04, 05:33 PM
Walter L. Shoemake III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

43.51 worked best for me Gainward Ti4200 Golden Sample 128 mb
"Bora Ugurlu" wrote in message
...
warlord716 warlord716@ wrote:
Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats

the
best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the newest ones

are
more optimized for the fx cards...

thanks in advance


I suggest you to stay with the ones you have.

I have 45.23, and tried recently 56.72 WHQL ones. I had a strange mouse
cursor problem with it (Logitech MX 510) and no visible improvements. so
I went back to 45.23 again.



  #5  
Old May 15th 04, 07:18 PM
Too_Much_Coffee ®
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently
have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats
the best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the
newest ones are more optimized for the fx cards...


The 44.03 are probably the best Ti4200 drivers but I'm currently using the
56.72 without any problems. The 45.23 drivers don't render images and
shadows correctly so avoid those.

My AquaMark3 score is 7000 points higher with the 56.72 compared to the
44.03. The newer games like Far Cry like the 56.72 drivers but some older
games seem to prefer the 44.03s.



Too_Much_Coffee ®

---
Got GigaNews?
http://www.giganews.com/customer/gn26215


thanks in advance



  #6  
Old May 15th 04, 10:32 PM
warlord716
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Too_Much_Coffee ®" wrote in message
...
Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently
have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats
the best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the
newest ones are more optimized for the fx cards...


The 44.03 are probably the best Ti4200 drivers but I'm currently using the
56.72 without any problems. The 45.23 drivers don't render images and
shadows correctly so avoid those.

My AquaMark3 score is 7000 points higher with the 56.72 compared to the
44.03. The newer games like Far Cry like the 56.72 drivers but some older
games seem to prefer the 44.03s.



Too_Much_Coffee ®


Thanks for all the replies, I will probably go with the 56.72 because I
generally play newer games (CNC generals, HW2, UT2004, etc)


  #7  
Old May 15th 04, 11:10 PM
PRIVATE1964
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The 44.03 are probably the best Ti4200 drivers

I use the 44.03's with my 4200. I think they are the fastest, but not much
difference then what your already using.
  #8  
Old May 16th 04, 12:06 AM
Mr. Grinch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"warlord716" wrote in news:LCdpc.34457
:

Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats the
best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the newest ones are
more optimized for the fx cards...

thanks in advance


The only way to get a real answer is to try the various drivers on your
machine using your games and software. Anything less is really just a guess.
Depending on the games / apps you run, some may improve, some may be slower.

I've got a dual P3-800 with MSI Ti4200 8x 128MB, running dual-boot WinME and
Server 2003. I've run 4.33, 53.03(04 for ME) and now 56.64(me) and 56.72
(2003).

In my case, the OS makes a bigger difference in the frame rates for Q3A and
other Q3A engine based games than the driver version does.

I think the biggest issue is botched driver installs and things not working.
For whatever reason, a lot of people have things "break" when they install
new drivers. Sometimes they find real bugs in the new driver, but even more
often it's something that's been broken as a result of the driver install.
An old file did not get replaced, or a new file did not get copied, or some
registry settings were lost or changed. I've run into this a few times
myself using the MSI drivers instead of the Nvidia drivers. The drivers
themselves are really the same, it's the installation that's different. In
my case, re-installing the Nvidia divers a second time fixed the issues.

Best of luck with your ti4200. They're great cards. No regrets buying mine at
all. It replaced a V5500.... that's another story in itself.

  #9  
Old May 16th 04, 12:45 AM
DaveW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are using the best driver for that card currently.

--
DaveW



"warlord716 yahoo.com" warlord716@NOSPAM wrote in message
...
Hi
I haven't updated my detonator drivers in quite a while (currently have
6.14.10.4533 - basically the 45.33 ones). Anyways im wondering whats the
best version to have for my ti4200 64mb, because i know the newest ones

are
more optimized for the fx cards...

thanks in advance




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. Julian Asus Motherboards 2 August 11th 04 12:43 PM
8500DV - on restart WinXP h/w auto detect reinstalls old drivers I just removed!! Ian Roberts Ati Videocards 6 July 20th 04 01:16 PM
Help with removing ancient "Platinum XG300" drivers Joshua Martin Nvidia Videocards 1 April 28th 04 10:47 PM
Forceware Drivers PBM Nvidia Videocards 2 February 20th 04 09:53 PM
Installing older 43.45 display drivers Max Harrell Nvidia Videocards 8 December 17th 03 05:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.