If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"JK" wrote in message ... It is not a matter of bashing, it is a matter of explaining to people that they should research the alternatives first, then decide if an Intel processor is a good choice. In most instances, an AMD processor will provide better performance at each price point. No if we want to learn about AMD we can go research it. We don't need you AMD lovers cramming it down our throats. If I want a space heater for I computer I would have bought a AMD years ago. Now Intel has the prescotts which are even better space heaters than the AMD's so once again Intel is superior. True I just want a computer so I will stick to my Northwood. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:51:22 GMT, "Lee Waun" wrote:
"JK" wrote in message ... It is not a matter of bashing, it is a matter of explaining to people that they should research the alternatives first, then decide if an Intel processor is a good choice. In most instances, an AMD processor will provide better performance at each price point. No if we want to learn about AMD we can go research it. We don't need you AMD lovers cramming it down our throats. [flushed] "We"? Go play in traffic... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:49:45 GMT, "Felger Carbon"
wrote: If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school. ;-) But tha only works in perhaps only one culture/context no? At least Bugs have got a bigger coverage :PppP -- L.Angel: I'm looking for web design work. If you need basic to med complexity webpages at affordable rates, email me Standard HTML, SHTML, MySQL + PHP or ASP, Javascript. If you really want, FrontPage & DreamWeaver too. But keep in mind you pay extra bandwidth for their bloated code |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:00:34 -0600, "Judd" wrote:
The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. It's to the point now where you can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture without the constant bashing. There should be a comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff. I'm sure you can find an "Intel site", where you can conduct iSeances in peace, if that's what you have in mind. As already pointed out to you, this is Usenet, the comp.sys... hierarchy specifically. If Outlook doesn't have an "ignore thread" feature, you could also consider using a real newsreader. Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:51:22 +0000, Lee Waun wrote:
"JK" wrote in message ... It is not a matter of bashing, it is a matter of explaining to people that they should research the alternatives first, then decide if an Intel processor is a good choice. In most instances, an AMD processor will provide better performance at each price point. No if we want to learn about AMD we can go research it. We don't need you AMD lovers cramming it down our throats. If I want a space heater for I computer I would have bought a AMD years ago. Now Intel has the prescotts which are even better space heaters than the AMD's so once again Intel is superior. Ok, you're saying, "I'm stupid and wish to remain so"? Or more like, "my mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts"? True I just want a computer so I will stick to my Northwood. You didn't research before you bought and now don't want to be told that you made a mistake? Burry your head deeper. The world will ignore you. -- Keith |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:00:34 -0600, Judd wrote:
The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. Fact propaganda. Propaganda is what you are left with when you refuse to listen. It's to the point now where you can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture without the constant bashing. There should be a comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff. If you're that thin-skinned perhas the Usenet isn't for you? Or does it depress you that much to know that you are what you claim others to be? Maroon! ;-) -- Keith |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Keith wrote: [...] True I just want a computer so I will stick to my Northwood. You didn't research before you bought and now don't want to be told that you made a mistake? Burry your head deeper. The world will ignore you. Not a mistake. The Northwood was quite a good choice everything considered. The performance issue is not as clear cut as you seem to suggest, you can probably find favourable benchmarks in both directions, depending on which team you belong. I have also built using Northwoord, but belong to neither team. Once the computer was completed, the processor type was not foremost in my mind. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Felger Carbon wrote:
If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school. ;-) In Canada, all that means is did you ever go to kindergarten? The short buses were for the littlest kids that went for only half a day. Yousuf Khan |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:00:34 -0600, "Judd"
wrote: The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. It's to the point now where you can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture without the constant bashing. There should be a comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff. Ever heard of the 1st Amendment? If you don't like it, you are free to go someplace like Cuba. Over there, neither INTC nor AMD is superior, that definition is reserved for Fidel exclusively. Oh, by the way, you'd be lucky to have just any CPU and 9.6k dialup over there... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:33:37 +0000, Johannes H Andersen wrote:
Keith wrote: [...] True I just want a computer so I will stick to my Northwood. You didn't research before you bought and now don't want to be told that you made a mistake? Burry your head deeper. The world will ignore you. Not a mistake. The Northwood was quite a good choice everything considered. The performance issue is not as clear cut as you seem to suggest, you can probably find favourable benchmarks in both directions, depending on which team you belong. You haven't been around here long, have you? Good grief! (as another cartoon character, to be named later, once said) I have also built using Northwoord, but belong to neither team. Now there is a laugh! ...and on many levels! ;-)) Once the computer was completed, the processor type was not foremost in my mind. Well, duh! You're saying that once you made your decisions youu didn't look back? At least you make *some* sense. -- Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | Michael Brown | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | September 27th 04 07:07 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | Michael Brown | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | September 27th 04 05:40 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | Michael Brown | General | 2 | September 27th 04 05:40 AM |
AMD Sempron ships | Yousuf Khan | General | 192 | September 8th 04 04:57 PM |
AMD SEMPRON CPU | patrick | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | July 29th 04 12:59 PM |