![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , moe @mci.com wrote:
I'm running a P4 2.66Ghz (533fbs/512cache/1.53 core v) on a P4G8X- Dlx motherboard. The bios core voltage is set at 1.525v but the voltage readouts in Asus Probe, MBM5, and the Bios hardware monitor all show the core voltage running at 1.6v which is a substantially higher than the set point. Is this normal or does it indicate a problem with the boards voltage regulator? Are there any other factors which could result such a large offset between the set and actual core voltage. ( I'm assuming the voltage read by the monitor programs is correct) thanks moe It is really hard to say what the Asus circuit is measuring, and how the software is converting the reading to the value you see on your screen. MBM5 should be the most "honest" software, as it reads the hardware directly and then computes the value. Probe or the BIOS, could be shielding the user from the truth. First of all, the hardware monitor will have some tolerances. A typical monitor chip has an 8 bit ADC to make the reading. Full scale might be 4.096 volts, meaning the step size is 0.016V. But note though, that if you watch the readings, the steps don't seem to be a multiple of 0.016, so I don't know if a running average is being used, or how to explain the pattern of readings you get. The ADC will have a voltage reference in it, and typically references are pretty sloppy, like maybe 1% or 2% of full scale etc. Also, Vcore is distributed on a solid copper plane on the motherboard, and the Vcore measurement is supposed to be made at a particular point, to be valid. Perhaps Asus isn't connecting the monitor to the correct physical point in the circuit, or another possibility is that there is a ground potential difference between where the monitor chip sits, and the processor Vcore plane. Measurements like this should be made differentially (a + lead and a - lead), instead of single ended (a + lead and a shared ground level). Measuring low voltages like this, requires a good deal of care, to be done properly. On some Asus motherboard models, the high Vcore value is very consistent from motherboard to motherboard, which considering the tolerances in the measurement, makes it hard to believe the reading is an honest one. If you are at all curious, download a datasheet for an Intel P4 processor. This is one from my collection: ftp://download.intel.com/design/Pent...s/29864312.pdf The VID specification is not a "single point" spec. In fact, the expected voltage follows a "load line". When the processor is running a program at 100% load, the voltage will be low by roughly 0.14 volts, for your nominal 1.525V processor. (That is assuming the processor is drawing 54 amps at the time.) Similarly, the voltage will be higher at idle, but should still be less than VID by roughly 0.04 volts. (That is assuming the processor is drawing 7.5 amps at the time, based on a guess.) The Intel spec would make it seem that voltages higher than the stated VID value, are out of spec. But the thing is, Asus is going to design the thing, such that they don't get a lot of calls from users complaining that "my Vcore is low, I want to RMA". So, try measuring the voltage when Windows is idle, and also when your computer is running Prime95 in torture test mode (mersenne.org). See how the results line up with the P4 datasheet. The absolute max for the P4 is 1.75 volts, and if Vcore is headed there, then you are right to worry. While by definition, a failure of the Vcore circuit to keep the processor voltage between the "high" and "low" load lines, is a failure to meet spec, I would only expect real trouble if the processor spends a lot of its time at 1.75 or higher volts. For example, a Tualatin processor has a rating of 1.75V max, and some die after 4 weeks at 1.8V. HTH, Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:55:49 GMT, moe wrote:
I'm running a P4 2.66Ghz (533fbs/512cache/1.53 core v) on a P4G8X- Dlx motherboard. The bios core voltage is set at 1.525v but the voltage readouts in Asus Probe, MBM5, and the Bios hardware monitor all show the core voltage running at 1.6v which is a substantially higher than the set point. Is this normal or does it indicate a problem with the boards voltage regulator? Don't know, but for my CPU (P4 2,53@2,85GHz) the Vcore is set to 1,525V too and MBM5 shows 1,5-1,6V (depending on CPU load) Are there any other factors which could result such a large offset between the set and actual core voltage. ( I'm assuming the voltage read by the monitor programs is correct) The CPU load seemes to be one of that factors. When the CPU is idle, MBM5 shows 1,6V. When i'm running SETI@Home, MBM5 shows 1,52-1,54V. Best regards, Swen -- "MCSE - Microsoft Certified Spongiform Encephalitis" [Dominik Rudisch in dtj] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upping core voltage on 9800 Pro/XT | Neil | Overclocking | 13 | August 1st 04 07:31 PM |
Mobile Athlon XP-M with 1.40 Core Voltage in Asus A7S333 (or another Board) | edfiedler | Asus Motherboards | 1 | May 26th 04 02:29 AM |
How do I pump up a CPU's core voltage? | Rob | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | March 7th 04 09:56 AM |
3.3V CORE voltage on P4C800 Deluxe | Tim Mavers | Asus Motherboards | 2 | November 21st 03 02:59 AM |
Xp2000+ core voltage? | Jerry McBride | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | July 21st 03 06:50 AM |