If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I cant believe u dickheads r still exchanging mobile!!!!!! numbers.Anyone of
u read the latest HL2 benchmark.........OK........Got a news 4 u ....nVidia (5600,5800,5900 Ultra)been kicked in the ass so bad .five days after the test they still jumping around... So called 5900Ultra :-))) cant even keep up with the 9600 Pro,even its ass kicked by PowerColor 9600 Pro Bravo Edition..............(In TRUE DX-9 environment) Have Nice Day From Down Under "Steve Vai" wrote in message ... finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
So u R...........
"Steve Vai" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote: "Steve Vai" wrote in message .. . finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass are you stupid? if you and i are joined at the head then yes, otherwise no. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah ,,keep trying DICKHEAD... One of these days u'll ****ing learn..But
it'll be toooo late...And u will pay $300 if u lucky to get one of , u know what....Little knowladge is always been dangerous , to me you r a blazing ****ing gun... "Steve Vai" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:50:28 GMT, "LeeB18509" wrote: "Steve Vai" wrote in message .. . finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. It's the card. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. It'll run you about $500...and not much else. exacly. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass Not likely. Instead you should derail your one track mind and come on over to the dark (light) side. yeah, when those $300 9800 pro's drop to $100 ....or $76 like this card was, i'm not going to spend 300 bucks to game all day online... anyhow ill have to run the benchmark again, as i've got it clocked now close to TI4800 levels... and stable in madden 2k4, nba live 2k3, THPS4 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Now.....Mr.DICKHEAD....Read and LEARN.............And go and get f....
ooops, I mean ATI............ "Morgan" wrote in message ... I think that you have got the idea that the 'issue' is the card / Direct X 9. If it is any consolation the list is not long and endless of games that require Direct X9 to run or use it for enhanced graphics. 3D Mark 2003 does, as yet, seems to be the only consolation that the top end cards of ATI and NVidia have got for themselves, apart from the Aquathingy, to really push the hardware. And now that it seems HL2 has been delayed there postones some peoples gratification for upgrading their machines with those powerful cards. Don't place as much emphasis on just a benchmark that really is weighted towards you 'needing' a new card - go to 3D Mark 2001 which tends to be representative of todays games. Or better still just play the games that you have got and enjoy them -- Regards Morgan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Weak 3dmark 2k3
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I get about 5900 with my 9800 Pro, and if I overclock the video by about 10%
I can get close to 7000. Maybe you should think about ATI. "Steve Vai" wrote in message ... finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sounds about right. No DX9 Vid card and pretty slow. Slow CPU. On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:25:26 -0700, Steve Vai wrote: finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Vai" wrote in message
... finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass are you stupid? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Vai" wrote in message ... finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. It's the card. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. It'll run you about $500...and not much else. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass Not likely. Instead you should derail your one track mind and come on over to the dark (light) side. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote:
"Steve Vai" wrote in message .. . finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak! either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows, i'd like to think it's my system. system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz 768meg ram on 150mhz fsb soyo dragon platinum kt333 WD 80 gig, 200 gig MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400 64meg) sb live value using onboard nic ------------------- 3Dmark 2003 sco 1757 wings of fury: 116.6 FPS battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?) trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?) cpu test 1: 41.4 fps cpu test 2: 8.0 fps fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels vertex shader: 5.1 fps ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?) didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder what the fx5900 ultra would run. after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600. hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass are you stupid? if you and i are joined at the head then yes, otherwise no. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
strange harddisk behaviour due to weak power supply ? | jyrgen | General | 1 | October 6th 04 09:01 PM |
3dmark benchmarking O/C's | ferdelance | Overclocking | 1 | August 26th 04 06:14 AM |
Socket 939 being reported by 3DMark 2001 version 200 | Wayne @ W. | AMD x86-64 Processors | 1 | May 13th 04 02:08 AM |
3dmark scores pathetically low? | rms | Overclocking | 8 | November 19th 03 11:38 PM |
3dmark 2001se scores in Win98 vs xp | DrWho | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | June 22nd 03 07:13 PM |