If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A7N8X-E XP2400+ to ???
Hi,
Knowing that AMD XP series are on the way to be discontinued, what should be my best choice to replace my XP2400+ ? -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB400 -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB333 -- Alni |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:41:25 +0100, Alni wrote:
Hi, Knowing that AMD XP series are on the way to be discontinued, what should be my best choice to replace my XP2400+ ? -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB400 -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB333 You won't see much of an improvement either way. If you want to stay with socket A, just oc your current cpu and don't waste money on a new one. The extra cache of the Barton core won't be that much of an improvement. If you want a noticable improvement switch to socket 754 or 939. A cheap overclocked Sempron 3100+ will get you to about 3800+ (A64) speeds. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bonjour,
Wes Newell said : On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:41:25 +0100, Alni wrote: Hi, Knowing that AMD XP series are on the way to be discontinued, what should be my best choice to replace my XP2400+ ? -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB400 -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB333 You won't see much of an improvement either way. If you want to stay with socket A, just oc your current cpu and don't waste money on a new one. The extra cache of the Barton core won't be that much of an improvement. If you want a noticable improvement switch to socket 754 or 939. A cheap overclocked Sempron 3100+ will get you to about 3800+ (A64) speeds. I would like to oc' the 2400 but the multiplier is locked to 15, and it doesnt run stable above 150Mhz = 2250 @1.775v. I have 1Go Samsung PC3200 and got better PCMarks running the ram sync to the FSB with more agressives timings than setting the ram near 200mhz with standard timings . I'm using the stock cooler and it's running 55° full load. Should I expect an improvement with a better cooler ? -- Alni |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:24:02 +0100, Alni wrote:
Bonjour, Wes Newell said : On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:41:25 +0100, Alni wrote: Hi, Knowing that AMD XP series are on the way to be discontinued, what should be my best choice to replace my XP2400+ ? -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB400 -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB333 You won't see much of an improvement either way. If you want to stay with socket A, just oc your current cpu and don't waste money on a new one. The extra cache of the Barton core won't be that much of an improvement. If you want a noticable improvement switch to socket 754 or 939. A cheap overclocked Sempron 3100+ will get you to about 3800+ (A64) speeds. I would like to oc' the 2400 but the multiplier is locked to 15, and it doesnt run stable above 150Mhz = 2250 @1.775v. I have 1Go Samsung PC3200 and got better PCMarks running the ram sync to the FSB with more agressives timings than setting the ram near 200mhz with standard timings . Well 2250MHz is a pretty good OC. I'm using the stock cooler and it's running 55° full load. Should I expect an improvement with a better cooler ? Yes. The stock XP coolers aren't very good at all. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bonjour,
Wes Newell a présenté l'énoncé suivant : Well 2250MHz is a pretty good OC. a kind of XP2800/266 I'm using the stock cooler and it's running 55° full load. Should I expect an improvement with a better cooler ? Yes. The stock XP coolers aren't very good at all. Yes I know it's crap, but should I expect a mhz improvement by using a better cooler ? nb: The XP2400 doenst run stable @2310 even @1,850v (which is the max V on A7N8X-E) even after a very cold start it always crash in minutes while the T° doesn't reach more than 55° (T° which is OK @2250mhz) at least, thanx for the replies -- Alni |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:59:06 +0100, Alni wrote:
Bonjour, Wes Newell a présenté l'énoncé suivant : Well 2250MHz is a pretty good OC. a kind of XP2800/266 I'm using the stock cooler and it's running 55° full load. Should I expect an improvement with a better cooler ? Yes. The stock XP coolers aren't very good at all. Yes I know it's crap, but should I expect a mhz improvement by using a better cooler ? nb: The XP2400 doenst run stable @2310 even @1,850v (which is the max V on A7N8X-E) even after a very cold start it always crash in minutes while the T° doesn't reach more than 55° (T° which is OK @2250mhz) It's hard to say for sure, but if it boots and runs Ok for a few minutes at 2310MHz, then it's likely to run of at that speed or higher with a good cooler. Before I replaced the old aluminum cooler on the cpu below it would crash before getting the OS loaded. No problems with a new hybrid cu $10 cooler (TR2-M3). On a newer board with a better PSu, it even went higher. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
3200/400
This will last you a long time, works great with NVIDIA based graphics cards and NVIDIA drivers. Don't count AMD out of coming out with at least one or two more socket 462 processors. There just is no 64 bit software to exploit the hardware. It is all hype. "Alni" wrote in message ... Hi, Knowing that AMD XP series are on the way to be discontinued, what should be my best choice to replace my XP2400+ ? -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB400 -XP3000+ / XP3200+ FSB333 -- Alni |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:09:05 +0000, John F. Regus wrote:
3200/400 This will last you a long time, works great with NVIDIA based graphics cards and NVIDIA drivers. Don't count AMD out of coming out with at least one or two more socket 462 processors. Socket A XP's have already been discontinued. You won't see any new cpus for it. At least nothing faster than the 3200+ (unless it's a Sempron, which uses higher ratings at slower speeds). There just is no 64 bit software to exploit the hardware. It is all hype. There doesn't have to be any 64 bit software, although almost all linux programs have 64bit compatible programs and have had 64bit kernels for a few years now. The CPU's operate 32bit code faster than the previous 32bit cpu's. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A7N8X Motherboard Low Temperature Sensitivity, CMOS Checksum Error | kony | General | 6 | October 18th 04 05:38 AM |
High temps with the Asus A7N8X | SPRITE1001 | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | April 19th 04 08:28 AM |
A7N8X Problems | Jason | Overclocking AMD Processors | 8 | March 14th 04 11:28 AM |
Asus a7n8x and Matrox G400 | VP | General | 1 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |
setting up a Xp2400 | JULIAN HALES | Overclocking AMD Processors | 4 | October 2nd 03 05:57 PM |