A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Asus Gf4 4200ti vs. generic vs. Asus fx5200



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 03, 08:54 PM
Bob Knowlden
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Asus Gf4 4200ti vs. generic vs. Asus fx5200

The FX5200 is a low-end DX9 card, but it may lack enough raw power to run
DX9 features.

The 4200 is from the previous generation; it's pretty fast (and sometimes
overclockable to near spec 4600 performance levels). It's DX8 only.

You don't mention your CPU/RAM, so I can't guess whether your card is
entirely the limiting factor.

If you can talk yourself into wasting more cash, I'd suggest a Radeon
9500pro, if you can still find one, or a 9600. Keep your hard-earned cash
with ATI in Canada. ;-)

Bob Knowlden

Spam dodger may be in use. Replace nkbob with bobkn.

"Mitchua" wrote in message
le.rogers.com...
I'm looking to spend about CAN$100 before taxes (15% here) for a new video
card since my Radeon 7000 64MB sucks donkey kong. Everyone tells me how
great the Gf4 4200ti is and I've been drooling over the benchmarks but

with
the Asus and MSI versions being at least $180, it's a little out of my

price
range. I'm sure I'd see a big preformance increase going to the Asus

FX5200
($112) but the benchmarks are significantly under the 4200ti so I don't

know
if it's worth buying now. To complicate matters more, I found a generic
(comes in white box, made in taiwan, cyberlink CD, VIVO, 1-year warranty)
GF4 4200ti for $109. Is a "crappy" generic 4200ti better than an Asus
FX5200? Will I really get what I pay for? What should I be considering
here?

Thanks for your help,
Mitchua




  #2  
Old August 2nd 03, 09:00 PM
Mitchua
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Knowlden" wrote in message
...
The FX5200 is a low-end DX9 card, but it may lack enough raw power to run
DX9 features.

The 4200 is from the previous generation; it's pretty fast (and sometimes
overclockable to near spec 4600 performance levels). It's DX8 only.

You don't mention your CPU/RAM, so I can't guess whether your card is
entirely the limiting factor.


I have an AMD 1800+XP @ 1621MHZ, 512MB DDR, Asus A7V266-E mobo, and the
Radeon 7000 64MB OC'ed to 173MHz. I think it's a pretty good bet the video
card is the limiting factor :-)


If you can talk yourself into wasting more cash, I'd suggest a Radeon
9500pro, if you can still find one, or a 9600. Keep your hard-earned cash
with ATI in Canada. ;-)


The 9000 and 9200 are in my price range. Would they beat the FX5200?

I've always gone with ATI but I don't want to lay down $300 for one of their
Radeon PRO series...yet :-)


Bob Knowlden

Spam dodger may be in use. Replace nkbob with bobkn.

"Mitchua" wrote in message
le.rogers.com...
I'm looking to spend about CAN$100 before taxes (15% here) for a new

video
card since my Radeon 7000 64MB sucks donkey kong. Everyone tells me how
great the Gf4 4200ti is and I've been drooling over the benchmarks but

with
the Asus and MSI versions being at least $180, it's a little out of my

price
range. I'm sure I'd see a big preformance increase going to the Asus

FX5200
($112) but the benchmarks are significantly under the 4200ti so I don't

know
if it's worth buying now. To complicate matters more, I found a generic
(comes in white box, made in taiwan, cyberlink CD, VIVO, 1-year

warranty)
GF4 4200ti for $109. Is a "crappy" generic 4200ti better than an Asus
FX5200? Will I really get what I pay for? What should I be considering
here?

Thanks for your help,
Mitchua






  #3  
Old August 3rd 03, 03:12 AM
Bob Knowlden
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know about the Radeon 9000, 9100, or 9200. They are apparently DX8
cards, regardless of the 9xxx designation.

(Reminds me of the infamous nVidia Geforce 4 MX cards - they were
essentially updated GF2 cards, DX7 devices, rather than DX8 like the GF4
ti.)

Based on http://www.ocaddiction.com/reviews/video/fx5200vsr9200/, the FX
5200 is at least a little better than the 9200. The 5200 is also a DX9 card,
although it may not be a good choice to run DX9 games, when they appear. In
my limited experience, the nVidia hardware/drivers are less finicky than the
ATI ones. (This is just an impression, not based on wide and rigorous
testing.)

I'm still pushin' that 9600pro ($178 USD, with free shipping, at
www.newegg.com.).

Have fun.

Bob Kn.

"Mitchua" wrote in message
le.rogers.com...
"Bob Knowlden" wrote in message
...
The FX5200 is a low-end DX9 card, but it may lack enough raw power to

run
DX9 features.

The 4200 is from the previous generation; it's pretty fast (and

sometimes
overclockable to near spec 4600 performance levels). It's DX8 only.

You don't mention your CPU/RAM, so I can't guess whether your card is
entirely the limiting factor.


I have an AMD 1800+XP @ 1621MHZ, 512MB DDR, Asus A7V266-E mobo, and the
Radeon 7000 64MB OC'ed to 173MHz. I think it's a pretty good bet the

video
card is the limiting factor :-)


If you can talk yourself into wasting more cash, I'd suggest a Radeon
9500pro, if you can still find one, or a 9600. Keep your hard-earned

cash
with ATI in Canada. ;-)


The 9000 and 9200 are in my price range. Would they beat the FX5200?

I've always gone with ATI but I don't want to lay down $300 for one of

their
Radeon PRO series...yet :-)


(snip)


  #4  
Old August 3rd 03, 03:48 AM
Mitchua
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Knowlden" wrote in message
...
I don't know about the Radeon 9000, 9100, or 9200. They are apparently DX8

SNIP
I'm still pushin' that 9600pro ($178 USD, with free shipping, at
www.newegg.com.).

In Canadian dollars that's like $250 + 8% GST + border taxes = more than my
life :-)


  #5  
Old August 9th 03, 04:59 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Coridon Henshaw ) wrote:
"Bob Knowlden" wrote in
:

I don't know about the Radeon 9000, 9100, or 9200. They are apparently
DX8 cards, regardless of the 9xxx designation.


Something else to keep in mind with Radeon-based cards is that their OpenGL
support is extremely bad for all models below the 9500. This is a critical
issue for non-gaming OpenGL but is also somewhat problematic for gamers.
The lower cards just aren't worth the money.



If you buy a 5200 either get a 256mb one
or if you get a 128mb one MAKE SURE It has a 128bit Memory bus
some only have 64bit memory bus.

:-) Greg B.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASUS K8V Deluxe - Motherboard Andre General 2 October 13th 04 01:46 AM
ASUS FX5200 Bonobo Overclocking 1 September 9th 04 03:08 AM
Motherboard Monitor versus Asus Probe HPLeft Overclocking AMD Processors 5 March 18th 04 11:41 PM
Asus Gf4 4200ti vs. generic vs. Asus fx5200 Bob Knowlden General 8 August 9th 03 04:59 AM
Asus Gf4 4200ti vs. generic vs. Asus fx5200 S.Heenan Homebuilt PC's 0 August 2nd 03 07:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.