NV40 ~ GeForce 6800 specs

As far as the reference Nvidia cards go... I'm pretty sure we'll start
out with the dustbuster again... at least until someone can decide on a
more effective method.

That kind of sucks with K8V if anyone taken notice of where the firewire
connector is in the motherboard.. it might fit perfectly tho, you never know
before you try..

I heard that NV40 boards will have _two_ power connectors...? When RADEON's
came with just one, I thought that was already one too many, LOL, but since
it's inside the case who cares in the end of the day. But two? Huh! 200+
Million transistors sure suck some power.. but certainly 350 Watt supply
with only 5 IDE devices connected should be enough? ;-)

It would suck if find out suddenly (from the smoke coming from the PSU) that
oh ****, looks like 450-500 watts would be required anyways... though I
find it amazingly unlikely, but since someone else in this thread was
concerned about his PSU being sufficient had to ask. NV40 would rock for
programming, because that's the only way for quite a while to try out VS 3.0
and PS 3.0 if I am not mistaken? I read from this NG that ATI wouldn't have
these in their new chip, why the hell not!?

Peace.

Ah,

http://frankenstein.evilgeniuslabs.c...nv40/news.html

I see from the pictures (assuming not fakes that the card should fit
reasonably to "single" AGP (8x) slot more or less.. that's nice, but the
best part about this debacle is two DVI ports. That is the part I like the
most, currently using DVI + DB25 to two TFT's.

Looks like a winner to me compared to ATI, performance alone isn't what
turns me on, RADEON 9700 PRO - RADEON 9800 XT are plenty fast as they come,
the enhanced feature set is what turns me on. Especially these two:

- 3.0 shaders (vertex samplers will be SO cool)
- 32 bit precision for the whole pipeline from vertex to output fragment, v.
cool

The rest is yada yada yada.. but those two features are what 'do it',
atleast for me from coder's point of view. Extra performance is so
yesterday. ;-)

No, really, I can't believe my eyes that after two year trip to the ATI
side, would again consider NV even a candidate, not to mention #1 choise as
gfx card upgrade. Must suck to base your choises to brandname aka. the
Fanboy's Choise. Looking at the offerings, this is a no-brainer for me.

"teqguy" wrote:

NightSky 421 wrote:

Regardless of if someone wants the new high-end nVidia or ATI product,
I've read that a person better have a monster power supply and
excellent case cooling before even considering such cards. I also
wonder how loud the fans on these new cards are going to need to be.
It'd be interesting to see what they can do with regards to cooling
and power consumption on future video cards too - I see this as
getting to be more and more of a problem with time.

The power consumption should stay below 15v.

The Geforce FX does NOT use the 12v rail, for anyone wondering.

All 4 pins are connected for potential usage, but the overall
consumption never raises above 5.5v so 17v is not neccessary.

Surely you can't believe that we can take the advice of someone who
thinks that power "consumption" is measured in Volts. What you wrote
is complete drivel, sorry.

"teqguy" wrote:

The best possible optimization that could ever be made, would be to
start manufacturing motherboards with sockets for a GPU and either
sockets or slots for video memory.


This would allow for motherboards to potentially reduce in size, while
increasing in performance and upgradability.


The price would increase, but it would be worth it.

No it wouldn't.

"Shep©" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:10:26 +0000 As truth resonates honesty K
wrote :

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:56:48 +0100, Shep© wrote:



*PCI Express x16, AGP 8x support

Looks like new mother boards required?



If there is AGP 8x support, why would you need a new motherboard?

K

Because it's my understanding that although the new protocol/cards
support AGP 8X this is merely a data rate comparison and the new cards
will only fit a,"PCI-Express" slot,not an AGP one.
http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1087

HTH




--
Free Windows/PC help,
http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
email shepATpartyheld.de
Free songs to download and,"BURN" :O)
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/nomessiahsmusic.htm

They still releasing AGP 8x versions along side PCI x16. I read somewhere
nvidia is doing something with a bridging device while ATI is making totally
seperate cards, ie R420 is agp 8x and R423 is a proper PCI x16 card. I
cannot for the life of me remember where I read it though sorry. It *could*
have been anandtech

"NV55" wrote in message
m...
the following is ALL quote:


http://frankenstein.evilgeniuslabs.c...nv40/news.html


Tuesday, April 13, 2004

NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GPU family officially announced - Cormac @ 17:00
It's time to officially introduce the new GPU generation from NVIDIA
and shed the light on its architecture and features.

So, the GeForce 6800 GPU family, codenamed NV40, today officially
entered the distribution stage. Initially it will include two chips,
GeForce 6800 Ultra and GeForce 6800, with the same architecture.


These are the key innovations introduced in NVIDIA's novelties:

*16-pipeline superscalar architecture with 6 vertex modules, DDR3
support and *real 32-bit pipelines
*PCI Express x16, AGP 8x support
*222 million transistors
*400MHz core clock
*Chips made by IBM
*0.13µm process


Isn't it time for NVidia to use 0.09um process? How could they put some
many features if still using 0.13 um process?

K wrote in message ...

I have a gut feeling that PCI Express will do very little for performance,
just like AGP before it. Nothing can substitute lots of fast RAM on the
videocard to prevent shipping textures across to the much
slower system RAM. You could have the fastest interface imaginable for
your vid card; it would do little to make up for the bottleneck that
is your main memory.




But what about for things that don't have textures at all?

PCI Express is not only bi-directional, but full duplex as well. The
NV40 might even use this to great effect, with its built-in hardware
accelerated MPEG encoding/decoding plus "HDTV support" (which I assume
means it natively supports 1920x1080 and 1280x720 without having to
use Powerstrip). The lower cost version should be sweet for Shuttle
sized Media PC's that will finally be able to "tivo" HDTV.

I can also see the 16X slot being used in servers for other things
besides graphics. Maybe in a server you'd want your $20k SCSI RAID
Controller in it. Or in a cluster box a 10 gigabit NIC.

There's more to performance than just gaming. And there's more to PCI
Express than just the 16X slot which will be used for graphics cards
initially. AGP was a hack, and (as others have said) it hit the wall
at "4X". PCI Express is a *VERY* well thought out bus that should be
alot better than PCI, PCI-X, and AGP... not to mention things bolted
directly to the Northbridge. If it helps games a little in the
process, it's just gravy.

The best possible optimization that could ever be made, would be to
start manufacturing motherboards with sockets for a GPU and either
sockets or slots for video memory.

This would allow for motherboards to potentially reduce in size, while
increasing in performance and upgradability.

The price would increase, but it would be worth it.

No it wouldn't.

haha! I agree completely. Videocards have reached such a complexity
it's doubtful that a single company could produce both successfully. Not to
mention the question of upgradeability, which is why we have pci/agp in the
first place.

rms

No, really, I can't believe my eyes that after two year trip to the ATI
side, would again consider NV even a candidate, not to mention #1 choise
as
gfx card upgrade. Must suck to base your choises to brandname aka. the
Fanboy's Choise. Looking at the offerings, this is a no-brainer for me.

pfft. You don't even know what the ATI offering is as yet, much less
are you able to buy a 6800 until well into next month.

rms