If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GA7N400 Pro Slow IDE Raid
Hi all,
I recently purchased the above mobo and set up a Raid 0 (Stripe) using 2 ATA 133 60gb drives. Using Sisoft benchmark the speed of this drive is returning 27,000, which is well below what it should be (probably close to double) I previoulsy had these drives on an ABIT mobo using raid and and got around 48k. The slower loading speed of games is noticable so its not just the benchmark reporting low. I have all the lates drivers as far as I can tell and F11 BIOS on the board. Any idea what could be causing the slow drives? Many thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Same problem. Welcome to the world of ITE! My problem was solved by buying
two pata to sata Siig adaptors and setting up raid on the Sata. My Sandra score is now 65550! "Zoney" wrote in message ... Hi all, I recently purchased the above mobo and set up a Raid 0 (Stripe) using 2 ATA 133 60gb drives. Using Sisoft benchmark the speed of this drive is returning 27,000, which is well below what it should be (probably close to double) I previoulsy had these drives on an ABIT mobo using raid and and got around 48k. The slower loading speed of games is noticable so its not just the benchmark reporting low. I have all the lates drivers as far as I can tell and F11 BIOS on the board. Any idea what could be causing the slow drives? Many thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for that.
I think I will buy two of these... http://www.highpoint-tech.com/rh.htm I presume thats what you mean by the adaptors? ITE try to give a sort of explanation as to why the Raid is slow... "4. During RAID 0 with 2HDD array, I find the data transfer rate depends on the lower one. Does it mean two IDE channels are not independent? Compared the performance of IT 8212 card to the performance of other RAID cards implemented by S/W, other RAID cards result in heavy loading of CPU utilization and IT8212 use less CPU utilization and occupy less system resource. Besides, if you want to get a better transfer rate, you can try to adjust the parameter of block size in RAID function. Maybe you will see a better result in you test. " On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:28:59 GMT, "Fred Klingenmeier" wrote: Same problem. Welcome to the world of ITE! My problem was solved by buying two pata to sata Siig adaptors and setting up raid on the Sata. My Sandra score is now 65550! "Zoney" wrote in message .. . Hi all, I recently purchased the above mobo and set up a Raid 0 (Stripe) using 2 ATA 133 60gb drives. Using Sisoft benchmark the speed of this drive is returning 27,000, which is well below what it should be (probably close to double) I previoulsy had these drives on an ABIT mobo using raid and and got around 48k. The slower loading speed of games is noticable so its not just the benchmark reporting low. I have all the lates drivers as far as I can tell and F11 BIOS on the board. Any idea what could be causing the slow drives? Many thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SATA is a software chip that uses the cpu, much like a winmodem. the ite is
hardware which minimizes cpu load. additionally, my sandra score with 2 WD Special Edition 120gb's in RAID 0 (64k) is 27000+/-, but the array is amazing when it comes to 'real world' performance. re-configuring over a sandra score (an invalid measure, e.g., doesn't measure what it purports to measure) seems flippant. "Zoney" wrote in message ... Thanks for that. I think I will buy two of these... http://www.highpoint-tech.com/rh.htm I presume thats what you mean by the adaptors? ITE try to give a sort of explanation as to why the Raid is slow... "4. During RAID 0 with 2HDD array, I find the data transfer rate depends on the lower one. Does it mean two IDE channels are not independent? Compared the performance of IT 8212 card to the performance of other RAID cards implemented by S/W, other RAID cards result in heavy loading of CPU utilization and IT8212 use less CPU utilization and occupy less system resource. Besides, if you want to get a better transfer rate, you can try to adjust the parameter of block size in RAID function. Maybe you will see a better result in you test. " On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:28:59 GMT, "Fred Klingenmeier" wrote: Same problem. Welcome to the world of ITE! My problem was solved by buying two pata to sata Siig adaptors and setting up raid on the Sata. My Sandra score is now 65550! "Zoney" wrote in message .. . Hi all, I recently purchased the above mobo and set up a Raid 0 (Stripe) using 2 ATA 133 60gb drives. Using Sisoft benchmark the speed of this drive is returning 27,000, which is well below what it should be (probably close to double) I previoulsy had these drives on an ABIT mobo using raid and and got around 48k. The slower loading speed of games is noticable so its not just the benchmark reporting low. I have all the lates drivers as far as I can tell and F11 BIOS on the board. Any idea what could be causing the slow drives? Many thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
It might seem "flippant" to you, but the scores directly translate to ATTO
drive benchmark also. Sata raid gave me ATTO up as much as 300% with large file read and writes ( 20337 write with the ite chip and 67700 with the sata chip). "Hervey Cleckley" wrote in message ... SATA is a software chip that uses the cpu, much like a winmodem. the ite is hardware which minimizes cpu load. additionally, my sandra score with 2 WD Special Edition 120gb's in RAID 0 (64k) is 27000+/-, but the array is amazing when it comes to 'real world' performance. re-configuring over a sandra score (an invalid measure, e.g., doesn't measure what it purports to measure) seems flippant. "Zoney" wrote in message ... Thanks for that. I think I will buy two of these... http://www.highpoint-tech.com/rh.htm I presume thats what you mean by the adaptors? ITE try to give a sort of explanation as to why the Raid is slow... "4. During RAID 0 with 2HDD array, I find the data transfer rate depends on the lower one. Does it mean two IDE channels are not independent? Compared the performance of IT 8212 card to the performance of other RAID cards implemented by S/W, other RAID cards result in heavy loading of CPU utilization and IT8212 use less CPU utilization and occupy less system resource. Besides, if you want to get a better transfer rate, you can try to adjust the parameter of block size in RAID function. Maybe you will see a better result in you test. " On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:28:59 GMT, "Fred Klingenmeier" wrote: Same problem. Welcome to the world of ITE! My problem was solved by buying two pata to sata Siig adaptors and setting up raid on the Sata. My Sandra score is now 65550! "Zoney" wrote in message .. . Hi all, I recently purchased the above mobo and set up a Raid 0 (Stripe) using 2 ATA 133 60gb drives. Using Sisoft benchmark the speed of this drive is returning 27,000, which is well below what it should be (probably close to double) I previoulsy had these drives on an ABIT mobo using raid and and got around 48k. The slower loading speed of games is noticable so its not just the benchmark reporting low. I have all the lates drivers as far as I can tell and F11 BIOS on the board. Any idea what could be causing the slow drives? Many thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How I built a 2.8TB RAID storage array | Yeechang Lee | Homebuilt PC's | 31 | February 22nd 05 06:40 PM |
Need help with SATA RAID 1 failure on A7N8X Delux | Cameron | Asus Motherboards | 10 | September 6th 04 11:50 PM |
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. | Julian | Asus Motherboards | 2 | August 11th 04 12:43 PM |
RAID 0 problems | no spam | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | April 30th 04 06:18 PM |
DAW & Windows XP RAID Tips, ProTools error -9086 | Giganews | Asus Motherboards | 0 | October 24th 03 06:45 AM |