If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
On Oct 20, 1:42 am, JAB wrote:
I wonder why they didn't ask you - go on have a think it about it? Simple .. they are ( professors ) ... shhh! not me |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
On Oct 21, 7:58 am, johns wrote: On Oct 20, 1:42 am, JAB wrote: I wonder why they didn't ask you - go on have a think it about it? Simple .. they are ( professors ) ... shhh! not me When a high-end card becomes morally obsolete, its price should significantly fall. But _they_ do not want that to happen, because they want you to buy their newest high-end card, and thus they want you to part with your money. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
johns wrote:
On Oct 20, 1:42 am, JAB wrote: I wonder why they didn't ask you - go on have a think it about it? Simple .. they are ( professors ) ... shhh! not me Not because you have views like your one about DX10 software mode as to why one card is more 'powerful' than another. Maybe they know you talk rubbish and that's the reason they didn't ask you - ever considered that? That fact your you haven't been sacked yet can only lead me to believe that your place of employment has absolutely nobody with more technical knowledge than you which sort of narrows it down to either a nunnery or it's a one man company. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:47:08 -0700, Beladi Nasralla
wrote: But there is a positive side to it, too. With a 1650x1050 screen, my games would run 20% slower than now ith a 1440x900 screen... Do not assume that 20% more pixels necessarily means 20% slower. There are a lot of factors at work there. 20% more pixels might run 40% slower in some games. The performance drop off could be logarithmic in some cases. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
Brabl writes:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:47:08 -0700, Beladi Nasralla wrote: But there is a positive side to it, too. With a 1650x1050 screen, my games would run 20% slower than now ith a 1440x900 screen... Do not assume that 20% more pixels necessarily means 20% slower. There are a lot of factors at work there. 20% more pixels might run 40% slower in some games. The performance drop off could be logarithmic in some cases. And also don't forget that this is more like 35% more pixels. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
It's a Nunnery.
johns |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end
johns writes:
It's a Nunnery. johns What is? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will this budget gaming system do for me??? | Amolao | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | August 14th 05 09:24 PM |
Building budget gaming system,,please need opinions | Amolao | Asus Motherboards | 6 | August 13th 05 03:21 AM |
How to build a gaming machine with a tight budget? | Ivan | Overclocking | 9 | December 22nd 04 11:07 AM |
Pending configuration for budget gaming | Zigzag | Overclocking AMD Processors | 11 | May 27th 04 08:02 AM |
Pending configuration for budget gaming | Zigzag | AMD Thunderbird Processors | 11 | May 27th 04 08:02 AM |