If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PCI MX cards on Windows 98 / 98 SE
I'm upgrading my house-mate's PC with a couple of cheap options, just enough
to play a few older LAN games for a while (Quake III, Half-Life etc). This PC will be replaced some time later this year, and I'll use it just as a mail server, but in the meantime it needs a little boost. It's got the following spec: - Windows 98 - Unknown Socket 7 mobo. ALi chipsets. No AGP. - On-board ATI Rage Pro 128 32MB - AMD K6-2 / 500Mhz CPU (might upgrade to an AMD K6-2 / 550Mhz) - 2 x 256MB PC100 SDRAM (motherboard max) I'm looking at the Geforce4 MX PCI range. Some websites state the need for Windows 98, while others state the need for Windows 98SE. There is much contradiction on the specs, and I'd like to know whether the MX PCI range will work on the original Windows 98. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cuzman wrote:
I'm looking at the Geforce4 MX PCI range. Some websites state the need for Windows 98, while others state the need for Windows 98SE. There is much contradiction on the specs, and I'd like to know whether the MX PCI range will work on the original Windows 98. I really don't see why not ... the 9x drivers are all labeled 95/98/Me. The drivers (ideally) are unified across the Geforce family, so there shouldn't be any issues, be it AGP or PCI. That said, the last PCI card I used was under 98 (and on a SS7 mobo), but it was a GF2. The PCI spec hasn't changed any since then, so I doubt it'll be a problem. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
you should actually go for a gf 2 family, that gf4 will be bottleneck by cpu
and ram, in the end you would be burning money, so save your self some cash and gf 2 mx or ti series card jsut my 2 cents "Cuzman" wrote in message ... I'm upgrading my house-mate's PC with a couple of cheap options, just enough to play a few older LAN games for a while (Quake III, Half-Life etc). This PC will be replaced some time later this year, and I'll use it just as a mail server, but in the meantime it needs a little boost. It's got the following spec: - Windows 98 - Unknown Socket 7 mobo. ALi chipsets. No AGP. - On-board ATI Rage Pro 128 32MB - AMD K6-2 / 500Mhz CPU (might upgrade to an AMD K6-2 / 550Mhz) - 2 x 256MB PC100 SDRAM (motherboard max) I'm looking at the Geforce4 MX PCI range. Some websites state the need for Windows 98, while others state the need for Windows 98SE. There is much contradiction on the specs, and I'd like to know whether the MX PCI range will work on the original Windows 98. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I don't really know what card I should suggest you, but I just want to point
another thing for you - the choice of Windows 9x OS. If you want to stick to 98, then it should definitely be 98SE. The first version of Win98 is so full of bugs, that I would, in fact, recommend you to keep Windows 95 OSR2 instead. So, avoid the first version of Win98!!! "Cuzman" skrev i meddelandet ... I'm upgrading my house-mate's PC with a couple of cheap options, just enough to play a few older LAN games for a while (Quake III, Half-Life etc). This PC will be replaced some time later this year, and I'll use it just as a mail server, but in the meantime it needs a little boost. It's got the following spec: - Windows 98 - Unknown Socket 7 mobo. ALi chipsets. No AGP. - On-board ATI Rage Pro 128 32MB - AMD K6-2 / 500Mhz CPU (might upgrade to an AMD K6-2 / 550Mhz) - 2 x 256MB PC100 SDRAM (motherboard max) I'm looking at the Geforce4 MX PCI range. Some websites state the need for Windows 98, while others state the need for Windows 98SE. There is much contradiction on the specs, and I'd like to know whether the MX PCI range will work on the original Windows 98. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:46:52 +0100, "MheAd"
wrote: I don't really know what card I should suggest you, but I just want to point another thing for you - the choice of Windows 9x OS. If you want to stick to 98, then it should definitely be 98SE. The first version of Win98 is so full of bugs, that I would, in fact, recommend you to keep Windows 95 OSR2 instead. So, avoid the first version of Win98!!! BULL**** Win98 is FAR MORE STABLE and USABLE than Win95. Its a godsend in comparision. Yeah, Win98se is better - but its more of tweaked version with some fixes and added IE... With the posters CPU - A Voodoo3-2000 would be better for him, as Nvidia cards really take a bath on PCI - especially on the old K6 systems. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will Windows Power the Living Room? | Ablang | Homebuilt PC's | 32 | July 8th 04 05:34 AM |
Freedom: Coming to a Windows Box Near You | Ablang | General | 0 | June 30th 04 03:04 AM |
Please help with new system - hangs when booting Windows 2000. | Kevin Lawton | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | April 14th 04 02:40 AM |
Can't Run 2 ATI Radeon Cards in my W2K Box--HELP! | Ken Fox | Ati Videocards | 5 | December 15th 03 03:06 PM |
P4P800Dlx W2K Won't Run 2 Video Cards | Ken Fox | Asus Motherboards | 2 | December 13th 03 08:29 AM |