A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Just curious..



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 5th 03, 01:12 AM
Darkfalz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roger" wrote in message
...

"Darkfalz" wrote in message
...
"Roger" wrote in message

...
What speed increase could I expect by switching from a GF1 with 32MB DDR
RAM to a "plain" FX5700 with 128?


That depends on whether you have a CPU of the same era as your GF1, if

that
is the case then don't expect much better performance at all. The only
difference is you'll be able to run at higher res with FSAA and things

like
that on, but your CPU will be a fat bottleneck.


How will a PIII / 1,2GHZ handle it? Or do I need something closer to the
double of that.

Dude, a P3 1.2 GHz is not NEARLY enough for that card. A FX 5200 would max
that piece of ****.

But like I said, if you got the FX 5700 then you would be able to run all
your games with 4xFSAA and 8 tap ansio at the same framerates you're getting
now.


  #12  
Old December 7th 03, 01:35 AM
Helion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"xyzzy" wrote in message
...
"Roger" wrote:

performance of cards? I am mainly interested in the basic OpenGL
performance of gaming cards. That is, I don't care about latest eye
candy, AA and AF info would be nice but I still need an apples to
apples comparison at same resolution (which, btw, I am limited to
1280x1024 by the monitor anyway). I guess what I really need to know
is the plain/textured tri count per card per resolution per aa
setting.. etc that yield acceptable (say 20fps) performance. Any such
sites? At the moment, it's very difficult to assess price/performance
ratios and the GPU manufacturer specs (ie fillrates and such) are
pretty unreliable.


For the most part, nvidia cards are best for OpenGL and ATI seems to have
the edge with DX9.


  #13  
Old December 7th 03, 04:59 AM
Darthy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:28:34 +0100, "Roger"
wrote:


"Darkfalz" wrote in message ...
"Roger" wrote in message

...
What speed increase could I expect by switching from a GF1 with 32MB DDR
RAM to a "plain" FX5700 with 128?


That depends on whether you have a CPU of the same era as your GF1, if that
is the case then don't expect much better performance at all. The only
difference is you'll be able to run at higher res with FSAA and things like
that on, but your CPU will be a fat bottleneck.


How will a PIII / 1,2GHZ handle it? Or do I need something closer to the
double of that.


If youre not planning on upgrading your CPU anytime soon... a Ti4200
for $75 will perform the same on your computer.

Your CPU is on the slow end, but a video card upgrade can get you a
bit higher in game quality...

But games like UT2004 / Half Life2 and Doom3 will require a bit more
CPU horse power.


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!
  #14  
Old December 14th 03, 06:11 PM
Kanda' Jalen Eirsie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greetings...

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:21:21 +0100, "Roger" wrote:

I thought I'd get an answer like this. But what I mean is like.. What speed increase
can I realisticly expect in games? How many times the frame rate if you will..


Your milage may vary...

But his answer was correct - in your case- with the info you have so far provided, the
answer is entirely subjective...

The first thing you will notice are all the really nice textures and colors you have
never seen before! Then you will be amazed at the incredible framerate and smoothness of
everything. The fog actually looks wispy and foggy, the lighting is subdued and looks
strangely more real.... Your spine will tingle in scenes that you had before started
yawning in... Your games will all suddenly become NEW again...

Then you will notice that your aiming sucks, and for awhile, you will play like a newbie
because all your skills have to be relearned to cope with all the new information and the
faster framerate. You will actually get lost on levels you know well... Because
everything looks different, better, and you won't have the same visual cues you had
before....


Like he said, going from a go-cart to a formula 1 racer... You may know how to drive,
and you may be a great driver in a go-cart, but driving a F1 is not the same thing!

Relish the experience... It's a neat thing... A real live thrill ride when you first
upgrade.. Then the new wears off... 6 months later - you start thinking of upgrading
again...

It's kind of like crack...

ll
Kanda'

SPAM-KILLER- If you really want to contact me, then -
kandajeatbresnandotnet

You figure it out...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just curious... Augustus Overclocking AMD Processors 25 March 16th 04 01:23 AM
Curious problem with Vaio (ATI Rage Mobility) and Pinnacle Studio 8 Ronald O. Christian Ati Videocards 0 February 5th 04 05:55 AM
Curious Direct CD problem Karl Engel Cdr 1 January 11th 04 02:00 AM
curious problem: L1 cache and non-booting. Toby Newman Overclocking AMD Processors 9 September 29th 03 02:15 PM
Curious about ATI 9600Pro purchase Ron Joiner Ati Videocards 2 August 25th 03 01:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.