|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 15th 03, 04:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Aquamark score so far...
My 5900 Ultra got 43,567 points. Not bad I think. SO far no 9800 with my
same system specs has a higher score. I know this will probably change, but so far not too bad. The 9800 below my score is 42286. p4-3g 1g ram 5900 ultra 43,567.  
|
|
#2
September 15th 03, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"not me" wrote in message ... My 5900 Ultra got 43,567 points. Not bad I think. SO far no 9800 with my same system specs has a higher score. I know this will probably change, but so far not too bad. The 9800 below my score is 42286. p4-3g 1g ram 5900 ultra 43,567. 35,478 for my radeon 9700 pro (bog standard settings), XP2600 333fsb and 512mb (non-dual channel) pc2700 on abit nf7s.
|
|
#3
September 15th 03, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is how my 5800 Ultra performed. Pentium 4 2gig, 768 MB ram
AquaMark Sco 28620 (CPU: 4992, GFX: 4011) Average fps 28.62 "methylenedioxy" wrote in message ... "not me" wrote in message ... My 5900 Ultra got 43,567 points. Not bad I think. SO far no 9800 with my same system specs has a higher score. I know this will probably change, but so far not too bad. The 9800 below my score is 42286. p4-3g 1g ram 5900 ultra 43,567. 35,478 for my radeon 9700 pro (bog standard settings), XP2600 333fsb and 512mb (non-dual channel) pc2700 on abit nf7s.
|
|
#4
September 16th 03, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"not me" wrote in message
... My 5900 Ultra got 43,567 points. Not bad I think. SO far no 9800 with my same system specs has a higher score. I know this will probably change, but so far not too bad. The 9800 below my score is 42286. p4-3g 1g ram 5900 ultra 43,567. AMD tbird 1.2 overclocked to 1.4 512 megs pc-133 ram fx5900 256 megs score=27,700 gfx=4206 cpu=4057 Not to bad i guess for an old system If anyone wonders why i put the 5900 in such an out dated box...i was given to me as a gift -- Bob.W
|
|
#5
September 16th 03, 05:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:31:08 GMT, "Bob W."
wrote: "not me" wrote in message ... My 5900 Ultra got 43,567 points. Not bad I think. SO far no 9800 with my same system specs has a higher score. I know this will probably change, but so far not too bad. The 9800 below my score is 42286. p4-3g 1g ram 5900 ultra 43,567. AMD tbird 1.2 overclocked to 1.4 512 megs pc-133 ram fx5900 256 megs score=27,700 gfx=4206 cpu=4057 Not to bad i guess for an old system If anyone wonders why i put the 5900 in such an out dated box...i was given to me as a gift -- Nice gift.......... Any chance your donor could send me one as well ?? John Lewis Bob.W
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 9800 Pro and Aquamark 3 (huge performance hit) | Fitz | Ati Videocards | 11 | October 20th 04 06:28 PM |
| what settings for 3dmark03 score? | Highlandish | Ati Videocards | 10 | June 24th 04 01:37 AM |
| 9600XT: how's this 3DMark score? | LRW | Ati Videocards | 7 | January 22nd 04 08:24 AM |
| Good or Bad Score | Dragon | Nvidia Videocards | 7 | September 10th 03 08:15 PM |
| PCMark03 - Score > Good, Bad or Average? | Russ | Asus Motherboards | 2 | July 16th 03 01:18 AM |
Linear Mode
