If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3Dmark2001SE
I just learned about the benchmark program, 3DMark2001SE and downloaded the
free version . (I'm sure most people on this newsgroupare aware of it). My rating was 8537, is this good, bad or average? Intel MB D865PERL 2.4 Ghz P4 1 Gb DDR 400 Mhz RAM DirectX 9 ATI AIM 9000 Pro Ed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
not bad, considering you have a ****e motherboard
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ARRRRGGHHH you can smell the ****e from here... ewwww
"atwifa" wrote in message ... not bad, considering you have a ****e motherboard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What is so wrong with this Intel motherboard? So far it has been rock solid
as opposed to my other two noname motherboard systems. This PC is not setup as a high end garphics or game system but a general purpose PC with the additional ability to capture video from analog sources. It works fine for me. Again this is not intended to be a gaming system. "Jimmy" wrote in message om... ARRRRGGHHH you can smell the ****e from here... ewwww "atwifa" wrote in message ... not bad, considering you have a ****e motherboard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
if it works for you then great, just ignore the its **** thing.
but your asking for it when you start benchmarking and posting results with things like 3dmark. its a benchmark for gamers so they kinda think you have a game rig if your benching it. you shuld use things like sys mark "or what ever its called" to test your sys, if your not a gamer and dont care how good your sys preforms in 3d games. and its not a realy bad score for your main board and grafics card. is scores around what my old 1800+ amd and gf 3 ti 200 or ati 8500 did. if you had a better video card iw would be a lot faster in 3d. i realy dont think your main board is that bad. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM! Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter http://mail.giantcompany.com "dotnetman" wrote in message ... What is so wrong with this Intel motherboard? So far it has been rock solid as opposed to my other two noname motherboard systems. This PC is not setup as a high end garphics or game system but a general purpose PC with the additional ability to capture video from analog sources. It works fine for me. Again this is not intended to be a gaming system. "Jimmy" wrote in message om... ARRRRGGHHH you can smell the ****e from here... ewwww "atwifa" wrote in message ... not bad, considering you have a ****e motherboard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My rating was 8537, is this good, bad or average? Intel MB D865PERL 2.4 Ghz P4 1 Gb DDR 400 Mhz RAM DirectX 9 ATI AIM 9000 Pro For a 9000 Pro it's not bad. Even with a P4 3.2 you won't be getting much over 9500 or so. My 8500 128Mb gets 11,800 with a Barton at 2.200Ghz. The main difference is that the 9000 and 9200's can only process one texture per cycle, whereas the 8500 / 9100 family can do 2 per pass. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
trouble with intel boards is that they do what is says on the box .... but
that's it. nothing else. they're not configurable/adjustable *at all* |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P4C800-E Deluxe / ATI 9800pro build results | Paul | Asus Motherboards | 0 | May 28th 04 01:52 PM |
3dMark2001SE FUBAR... | Tin-Char D'un | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | February 13th 04 11:18 AM |
3DMark2001se score of 13,000 on a 9800 Pro? | Chrisr | Ati Videocards | 8 | February 8th 04 10:02 PM |
Only 4 points gain in 3dmark2001se? | Asestar | Ati Videocards | 6 | February 7th 04 08:53 AM |
3DMark2001SE uses 60Hertz instead of 100Hertz?? | Wayne Youngman | Ati Videocards | 1 | September 22nd 03 08:42 PM |