If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Only 4 points gain in 3dmark2001se?
I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp
apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The last time I bm'd a card at default and then performance setting was with
a 9600xt a week or so ago. the difference wasn't much (can't remember exactly) maybe no more than a hundred? I am not surprised to see the difference in your card. For some comparison though, try it at quality settings. The 9600xt went from around 11600 to 4300? Glenn "Asestar" )_nospam_ wrote in message ... I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.577 / Virus Database: 366 - Release Date: 03/02/2004 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I'm out of words! I set "high quality" and ran the benchmark. I got 6252!
That's with 8xAF! Only 70point drop.. not bad i guess.. "Glenn" wrote in message ... The last time I bm'd a card at default and then performance setting was with a 9600xt a week or so ago. the difference wasn't much (can't remember exactly) maybe no more than a hundred? I am not surprised to see the difference in your card. For some comparison though, try it at quality settings. The 9600xt went from around 11600 to 4300? Glenn "Asestar" )_nospam_ wrote in message ... I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.577 / Virus Database: 366 - Release Date: 03/02/2004 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This just in.. At "optimal quality" I got 6066. I guess not a big drop
considering 16xAF, 2xAA quality. Compaired to "high quality" 6252, "default" 6320, and "optimal performance" 6324. Oh and card runs at 250/250 @ 254/254 What do you say? "Glenn" wrote in message ... The last time I bm'd a card at default and then performance setting was with a 9600xt a week or so ago. the difference wasn't much (can't remember exactly) maybe no more than a hundred? I am not surprised to see the difference in your card. For some comparison though, try it at quality settings. The 9600xt went from around 11600 to 4300? Glenn "Asestar" )_nospam_ wrote in message ... I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.577 / Virus Database: 366 - Release Date: 03/02/2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 20:58:32 GMT, "Asestar"
)_nospam_ wrote: I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. Upggraded to what? Also... duron 1.3 / PC133 will severely effect performance.... MORE CPU power is needed. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No upgrades. That's the whole point, all these test were performed on same
config in bios. Only changes were in ATI panel, as mentioned. I know duron1,3 is not fast, but it's my secondary system, mainly for surfing, movies and downloading. However But what do you think? Is it kinda good for this system? I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. Upggraded to what? Also... duron 1.3 / PC133 will severely effect performance.... MORE CPU power is needed. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 14:48:14 GMT, "Asestar"
)_nospam_ wrote: No upgrades. That's the whole point, all these test were performed on same config in bios. Only changes were in ATI panel, as mentioned. I know duron1,3 is not fast, but it's my secondary system, mainly for surfing, movies and downloading. However I dunno... I have no idea what youre comparing your 8500Le to... But what do you think? Is it kinda good for this system? More than enough power for movies, surfing and downloading. I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp apperture, agp4x. In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and mipmap), the result was 6320. I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the result came 6324. That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal? I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo. Upggraded to what? Also... duron 1.3 / PC133 will severely effect performance.... MORE CPU power is needed. -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! -- Remember when real men used Real computers!? When 512K of video RAM was a lot! Death to Palladium & WPA!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Earn money by completing serveys, not points!!! | paul | Asus Motherboards | 1 | December 30th 03 06:36 AM |
Earn money by completing serveys, not points!!! | paul | General | 1 | December 30th 03 01:56 AM |
Earn money by completing serveys, not points!!! | paul | Scanners | 0 | December 30th 03 01:13 AM |
Earn money by completing serveys, not points!!! | paul | Gigabyte Motherboards | 0 | December 30th 03 01:12 AM |
Earn money by completing serveys, not points!!! | paul | Cdr | 0 | December 30th 03 01:11 AM |