If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Getting lower 3DMark score when overclocking
I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to
various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
this happened to me, and this is what was causing it for me...
Sometimes, I found that powerstrip (or is it the card itself?) doesn't seem to like certain clock combinations and resets to the defaults (or lower). When this happens, the screen goes black for a second of so. When I re-applied the same clock settings, all was okay. I wonder if that is happening to you? Check the actual clocks that powerstrip is displaying (Performance Profiles Configure) after the benchmark when you get odd results. If they are at the default or lower (sometimes they can even be 'undefined' and the sliders are all the way down) then you need to reapply the settings and try again. S "Daniel Czajko" wrote in message ... I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If you can clock it even slower, maybe you'll turn it into an 9900 or
something? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to
various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Your card is too hot and as a result you get lower scores. Cool the cpu and ram down. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:34:11 -0000, "stu" waffled on
about something: I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Your card is too hot and as a result you get lower scores. Cool the cpu and ram down. Unless the 9700pro has automatic overheat detection and clock step down circuitry (like the P4), I don't think you'll find this is true. Excesses of temperature cause digital noise. In memory this will show up as image/data corruption. In the processor it results in crashes and lock ups. OP: I've found in the past the repeatedly running 3dmark will actually give a lover and lower score (certainly did with 2001se). I suspect it's not tidying up very well after itself. I always do a full reboot before running it. D0d6y. -- MUSHROOMS ARE THE OPIATE OF THE MOOSES |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Dodgy" wrote in message
news On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:34:11 -0000, "stu" waffled on about something: I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Your card is too hot and as a result you get lower scores. Cool the cpu and ram down. Unless the 9700pro has automatic overheat detection and clock step down circuitry (like the P4), I don't think you'll find this is true. Doesn't sound right, does it. But it is. I didn't believe it myself, but some months back I also discovered this to be true: Overclock your card too far and your scores drop. Chip. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:36:35 -0000, "Chip"
waffled on about something: "Dodgy" wrote in message news On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:34:11 -0000, "stu" waffled on about something: I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Your card is too hot and as a result you get lower scores. Cool the cpu and ram down. Unless the 9700pro has automatic overheat detection and clock step down circuitry (like the P4), I don't think you'll find this is true. Doesn't sound right, does it. But it is. I didn't believe it myself, but some months back I also discovered this to be true: Overclock your card too far and your scores drop. I can't believe it's due to heat though... More like the on board oscillators can't make the grade and miss beats. D0d6y. -- MUSHROOMS ARE THE OPIATE OF THE MOOSES |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Dodgy" wrote in message ... On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:36:35 -0000, "Chip" waffled on about something: "Dodgy" wrote in message news On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:34:11 -0000, "stu" waffled on about something: I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Your card is too hot and as a result you get lower scores. Cool the cpu and ram down. Unless the 9700pro has automatic overheat detection and clock step down circuitry (like the P4), I don't think you'll find this is true. Doesn't sound right, does it. But it is. I didn't believe it myself, but some months back I also discovered this to be true: Overclock your card too far and your scores drop. I can't believe it's due to heat though... More like the on board oscillators can't make the grade and miss beats. Maybe. That sounds plausible. Chip. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The unusual
results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Your card is too hot and as a result you get lower scores. Cool the cpu and ram down. Why is it faster at +25 then? Before giving incorrect advise read the entire message. Have a nice day! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:41:08 -0500, "Daniel Czajko"
wrote: I have a Radeon 9700 Pro. Using powerstrip 3.4, I overclocked the card to various levels and ran the 3DMark03 build 340 benchmark. The unusual results that I get are that when overclocking the Core and Memory by +15 MHz and +15 MHz respectively, I get lower scores than if not overclocking at all. And if I overclock the card to +20/+20 or +25/+25, I get higher results than with stock settings (as expected). Does anyone know why the lower score when overclocking at only +15+15? I tried this several times over and over, with VPU Recover and without, still with the same unusual results. Any clues? Several times but if you just did everything the same, it's not going to help. For example, did you turn on powerstrip before doing all benchmarks (Even stock)? If not, this might be affecting it. Did you always run the +15mhz after doing stock? Again this is might affects things. What you should do is do turn of comp, and do cold boot after 10 mins and try it at +15mhz then stock. Then turn it off for 10 mins, do a cold boot and try at stock then +15mhz. Then turn off for 10 mins, cold boot then try only +15 mhz. Then turn off for 10 mins, do cold boot then only 0 mhz. Then repeat cycle at least once. Of course, you probably don't need to do it this many times but since you are already doing it a lot of times, you should try a better way of doing it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upgraded To PC3200 RAM. Now 3DMark score is LOWER?? | pberry | Asus Motherboards | 2 | April 10th 04 10:14 AM |
! Someone tested overclocking a7v8x-x and amd xp cpu -Overclocking suceeded | Nobody | Asus Motherboards | 0 | February 13th 04 08:32 AM |
9600XT: how's this 3DMark score? | LRW | Ati Videocards | 7 | January 22nd 04 08:24 AM |
mx440 - 3dmark score | g | Overclocking AMD Processors | 4 | November 4th 03 01:08 AM |
OverClocking Guides | Phil Weldon | Overclocking | 0 | August 15th 03 05:41 AM |