If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
whining snipped
You really need to get a life. Printers are disposable, everyone know that. Move on. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Dan G wrote:
whining snipped You really need to get a life. Printers are disposable, everyone know that. Move on. After 5 years a printer becomes obsolete. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Dan G wrote:
whining snipped You really need to get a life. Printers are disposable, everyone know that. Move on. A 550$ printer is disposable? I'm sure some HP Deskjet have printed easily 10 times as many pages without a glitch. You move on, Canon is crap! GP |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Jerry wrote:
Dan G wrote: whining snipped You really need to get a life. Printers are disposable, everyone know that. Move on. After 5 years a printer becomes obsolete. Really? Mine still did the job it had always done just before the last glitch a few days ago: print! GP |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I could possibly say that about a 17-th century ink pen that I have,
but I can't fault the manufacturer if they won't supply me a new nib for it. I think your postings have done the opposite of what your intent seems to be. You are testifying to how fantastically long your Canon printer has lasted. A lot longer that one might have imagined. What I get from your posting is that if one wants long term reliability from a printer, they should buy Canon! Mike |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Anoni Moose wrote:
I could possibly say that about a 17-th century ink pen that I have, but I can't fault the manufacturer if they won't supply me a new nib for it. I think your postings have done the opposite of what your intent seems to be. You are testifying to how fantastically long your Canon printer has lasted. A lot longer that one might have imagined. What I get from your posting is that if one wants long term reliability from a printer, they should buy Canon! What people get from your postings is that either you're a dumbbell or you're a Canon troll. My BJ printer needed service 3 times for printing about one tenth what some Deskjet 500 printers have printed without any trouble. Your dammage control is harming Canon. GP |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
GP wrote:
Anoni Moose wrote: I could possibly say that about a 17-th century ink pen that I have, but I can't fault the manufacturer if they won't supply me a new nib for it. I think your postings have done the opposite of what your intent seems to be. You are testifying to how fantastically long your Canon printer has lasted. A lot longer that one might have imagined. What I get from your posting is that if one wants long term reliability from a printer, they should buy Canon! What people get from your postings is that either you're a dumbbell or you're a Canon troll. My BJ printer needed service 3 times for printing about one tenth what some Deskjet 500 printers have printed without any trouble. Your dammage control is harming Canon. GP then why didn't you buy an hp at the time? seems like you are just not gonna be happy with anything you buy. how long does something have to last before you are happy with it? From reading some of you posts, it seems like they did what they could for you and you are just not happy with that. so now its back to you and i guess your are just sitting at your computer waiting to respond to people here. I bet for the next few weeks, you are gonna be working on this problem. I hope you have a lot of free time, otherwise it just seems like a waste when you got 15 years of service out of it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
then why didn't you buy an hp at the time? seems like you are just not
gonna be happy with anything you buy. how long does something have to last before you are happy with it? From reading some of you posts, it seems like they did what they could for you and you are just not happy with that. so now its back to you and i guess your are just sitting at your computer waiting to respond to people here. I bet for the next few weeks, you are gonna be working on this problem. I hope you have a lot of free time, otherwise it just seems like a waste when you got 15 years of service out of it. I just had this thought that this is gonna set you off to develop the perfect printer. At least in Texas, there is this commercial on tv of this English guy that wasn't happy with the vacuum cleaner he had, it kept getting clogged. So he spent 10 years, and 10,000 prototypes later, he had a vacuum cleaner that " didn't do suction " so wouldn't get clogged. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
LOL
I love Canons, they are by far the cheapest to operate. The cost of the printer is irrelevant, it's the cost per page that makes it a value or not. My Canon S750 printed 10's of thousands of pages, and ink costs were about $50 for all of that. (I refill). So when the head finally died, I was not at all upset, it was an excuse to buy a new PIXMA, which is a way better printer and uses the same cheap ink!! 15 years ago, $500 was a "cheap" printer, and given the relatively low quality that such a printer puts out, seeing it die should be a relief. "chuck" wrote in message ... then why didn't you buy an hp at the time? seems like you are just not gonna be happy with anything you buy. how long does something have to last before you are happy with it? From reading some of you posts, it seems like they did what they could for you and you are just not happy with that. so now its back to you and i guess your are just sitting at your computer waiting to respond to people here. I bet for the next few weeks, you are gonna be working on this problem. I hope you have a lot of free time, otherwise it just seems like a waste when you got 15 years of service out of it. I just had this thought that this is gonna set you off to develop the perfect printer. At least in Texas, there is this commercial on tv of this English guy that wasn't happy with the vacuum cleaner he had, it kept getting clogged. So he spent 10 years, and 10,000 prototypes later, he had a vacuum cleaner that " didn't do suction " so wouldn't get clogged. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
chuck wrote:
then why didn't you buy an hp at the time? Because Canon's prints were slightly better better and I had no idea of the relative reliability of both prodcts and about Canon's dishonesty . seems like you are just not gonna be happy with anything you buy. Where do you get that from dumbbell? What's your source? I usually take quite a lot of time before buying a product and am usually satisfied with the products I buy. how long does something have to last before you are happy with it? I already answered this. From reading some of you posts, it seems like they did what they could for you and you You mean like absolutely refusing to tell me where that little sponge in the purge unit was, dumbbell? are just not happy with that. so now I bet for the next few weeks, you are gonna be working on this problem. Soon, for the next few /years/, I'll have everything I need to cut and paste. References at Google's, etc. ****, I can't believe this. Canon would have no interest in me repeating the story on how full of **** they are, refusing to give the plainest explanations to grab their customer's money. HP troll maybe... GP |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
canon i960 | chuck clark | Printers | 2 | December 4th 03 07:01 PM |
Canon driver, Photoshop and ColorSync ? | Paul | Printers | 0 | November 14th 03 11:08 PM |
Canon i560 - Hello Canon GoodBye HP | john | Printers | 0 | September 14th 03 11:57 AM |
canon s820 printhead clogged AGAIN (3rd time in 6 months!) | spamkiller | Printers | 0 | September 12th 03 03:23 AM |
Epson Photo 830 or Canon i550 | hm | Printers | 21 | August 3rd 03 01:55 AM |