If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not arguing one or the other, I still use both, and each has its
advantages. However, one of the "flaws" in film is grain, something digital doesn't have. Further, for color balancing the light source, digital has simple automated options. Digital allows for cheap experimentation, as well. Art Shooter wrote: Apart from my own view and experience of film versus digi your view just confirms that film is in front against digi for such work. "Arthur Entlich" wrote in message news:iR0Ke.157986$%K2.119424@pd7tw1no... Jon is absolutely correct regarding the need for unsharp masking of digitally acquired files. They all require it to differing degrees. It gets somewhat complicated, but it has to do with trying to limit sampling errors during the acquisition of the image file, and then correcting for the softness which is created in that earlier process to return sharpness to the image. Art Jon O'Brien wrote: In article , (Shooter) wrote: I have to disagree Jon, when you sharpen a digital file you can loose detail and alter colour. That depends on how the sharpening is done. If you use Photoshop, convert the image to Lab mode and sharpen only the lightness channel, the colour channels are unaffected. As for losing detail, I've never seen any evidence of that (unless the image is vastly over-sharpened), nor heard any suggestion that that's the case. The whole point of sharpening is to make detail easier to see by emphasising edge transitions. If it lost detail, there would be no point in doing it. That all digitally acquired images require some degree of sharpening isn't my idea, by the way. It's something I've picked up from people with many years of experience in the field. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it's common knowledge. ...the pro Digital Lab I use do allsorts of correction with gear I could not afford so they get the very best out of a file on a memory card. My comment was based on you saying: ...the digi shots were sent to another company who took them straight off the memory card to the printer... No mention of correction. Jon. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie: OC Advice: AMDXP2200 CPU | Donald Bock | Overclocking AMD Processors | 2 | March 12th 05 12:14 AM |
Machine seems slow. | [email protected] | General | 12 | January 20th 04 12:13 PM |
FIC or HIS for a 9600Pro? | Phrederick | General | 8 | December 16th 03 12:17 PM |
FIC or HIS for a 9600Pro? | Phrederick | Ati Videocards | 8 | December 16th 03 12:17 PM |
PC generating unusual "chirrupy" sound? | Coda | General Hardware | 1 | November 20th 03 07:52 PM |