If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
Yes, I did mention that in the very next paragraph that you did not
quote, BUT, he was discussing reams, and legal size paper, all North American usage, so, in the spirit of this group which is international in scope, I gave both sides to the information. Art Surfer! wrote: In message xy6zf.370371$ki.123634@pd7tw2no, Arthur Entlich writes I'm coming into this discussion a bit late so, I'm not sure what has already been mentioned. You have to be careful with paper weights, if they are done in pounds particularly (as many North American papers are rated). Those unfortunately have little to do with the weight of the paper you are buying in cut sizes like A4 or A3 (or letter size, or legal size, or whathaveyou). Paper weights when given in pounds are determined by the standard printers size the paper is cut to at the mill. They take, I believe 500 pages (which is one ream) and weight it, and that determines the weight of the paper, regardless of how it is cut up later. Snip The OP is in the UK (Leeds to be precise) so he doesn't have those things to worry about... |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
In comp.periphs.printers Arthur Entlich wrote:
Yes, I did mention that in the very next paragraph that you did not quote, BUT, he was discussing reams, and legal size paper, all North American usage, so, in the spirit of this group which is international in scope, I gave both sides to the information. We use reams here in the UK, all the paper I buy still comes in reams. -- Chris Green |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Yes, I did mention that in the very next paragraph that you did not quote, BUT, he was discussing reams, and legal size paper, all North American usage, so, in the spirit of this group which is international in scope, I gave both sides to the information. Art Surfer! wrote: (snipped) Thanks Art... that was one informative post... much appreciated. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
wrote:
In comp.periphs.printers Martin wrote: John wrote: Thanks for all the helps guys. What is a ream? Is that a pack of 500 sheets? It's a pack of paper that's usually between 300 and 500 sheets depending on the paper weight... 160gsm card would obviously have fewer sheets but the same rough weight in paper. I thought a ream was 500 sheets regardless of weight. Well try this one then - I thought it was 500 sheets. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ream 1. A quantity of paper, formerly 480 sheets, now 500 sheets or, in a printer's ream, 516 sheets. rm |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
I tested the 100gsm paper and I'm glad I only bought a small amount of
it. It's only slightly better than the cheap paper I had before. I am just going to go for it now, no messing about and buy it online. I am going to use up the rubbish paper I have for less important things, and from now onwards anything important text-wise I will always do on 120gsm paper. For what I need to do with the double sided printing though I am going to use 160gsm paper, that should hopefully do the trick. I think that 160gsm should be at the halfway point between being card and paper so with some luck it will still be quite flexible and the printer wont have trouble with sucking it through. I took a look at the Viking site and also the Euroffice one and they both seem to be quite good for different grades of paper. I will buy some 120 and 160 paper from one of these places. I am also googling for places I can buy Legal sized paper here in the UK. No joy so far at reasonable prices, but I'll keep looking. I didn't know a thing about paper a few days ago but now I am learning an awful lot especially from everyone in here (there's a lot of experts), and through trial and error Cheers John |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:48:55 +0000, John wrote:
I tested the 100gsm paper and I'm glad I only bought a small amount of it. It's only slightly better than the cheap paper I had before. I am just going to go for it now, no messing about and buy it online. I am going to use up the rubbish paper I have for less important things, and from now onwards anything important text-wise I will always do on 120gsm paper. For what I need to do with the double sided printing though I am going to use 160gsm paper, that should hopefully do the trick. I think that 160gsm should be at the halfway point between being card and paper so with some luck it will still be quite flexible and the printer wont have trouble with sucking it through. I haven't had a chance to check the UK sites, but for what you're talking about, you really should look into getting a coated paper, such as brochure paper or HP's 'Presentation Paper'. It will say 'matte coated' 'opaque' 'no show through' 'print both sides' or something similiar on the packaging. The HP Presentation paper is only 120 gsm, but prints quite nicely, at least on my HP machine. The package says 'For use with any inkjet paper'. You can have cardstock weight paper, but if it's not opaque or coated, you might still see the print through it. Most cardstock is not made for inkjets, I have expensive ultra-white cardstock for doing business laser printing with, but inkjet prints come out fuzzy. Unless the stock you buy specifically says 'multi use' or 'for inkjets', it might not show through, but it might not look good either. --- http://www.FenrirOnline.com Computer services, custom metal etching, arts, crafts, and much more. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
Martin wrote:
John wrote: Thanks for all the helps guys. What is a ream? Is that a pack of 500 sheets? It's a pack of paper that's usually between 300 and 500 sheets depending on the paper weight... 160gsm card would obviously have fewer sheets but the same rough weight in paper. (snipped) Sorry but your description of a ream is not true. A ream is a specific number of sheets and has nothing to do with the weight of the paper. A ream is 20 quires (look that up!). Like many measures there have been some variations over the years. The current definition of a ream of paper standard for printing and copying is 500 sheets. There is also a Printer Ream (a few sheets more probably an allowance for testing) and some other definitions, but they are all about 20 quires Occasionally one will see the term "Ream" used inappropriately, sometimes because of ignorance, sometimes in an attempt to cheat the public. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Paper Quality
George E. Cawthon wrote:
Martin wrote: John wrote: Thanks for all the helps guys. What is a ream? Is that a pack of 500 sheets? It's a pack of paper that's usually between 300 and 500 sheets depending on the paper weight... 160gsm card would obviously have fewer sheets but the same rough weight in paper. (snipped) Sorry but your description of a ream is not true. A ream is a specific number of sheets and has nothing to do with the weight of the paper. A ream is 20 quires (look that up!). Like many measures there have been some variations over the years. The current definition of a ream of paper standard for printing and copying is 500 sheets. There is also a Printer Ream (a few sheets more probably an allowance for testing) and some other definitions, but they are all about 20 quires Occasionally one will see the term "Ream" used inappropriately, sometimes because of ignorance, sometimes in an attempt to cheat the public. Well I stand corrected... thanks for clearing that up |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photo quality inkjet paper that you can write on the back on (for greeting cards) | Adam Del-Monte | Printers | 3 | January 22nd 05 10:02 PM |
Canon ip3000 and Kodak soft gloss double sided picture paper = faded blacks and wet ink | Steve | Printers | 1 | January 12th 05 03:57 PM |
Black dots/lines on i9900 prints | piledrivingbob | Printers | 0 | January 10th 05 05:15 AM |
GIGABYTE TECHNOLOGY receives highest honors—15th Annual National Quality Award | Gigabyte USA Marketing | Gigabyte Motherboards | 0 | November 4th 04 07:35 PM |
MP3s to CD: does "on-the-fly" burning give same audio quality as doing it in 2 steps?!.. | Anonymous Joe | Cdr | 15 | October 27th 03 06:55 AM |