If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mobile Barton vs. regular Barton: any advantages?
Does the mobile barton have any performance enhancements over the regular
bartons --aside from lower power consumption? What I mean by this is that at the same clock speed is a Mobile Barton any faster than a regular Barton? AMD doesn't seem to have any data sheets on the mobile bartons that I can see. -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No, there are no performance advantages when running at the same speed. The
main advantage the mobile has is that it's unlocked. I've found that the latest desktop cpu's (week 10 / 2004) overclock just as well as the mobile and at the same voltage...but the desktop version is locked. -- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Wblane" wrote in message ... Does the mobile barton have any performance enhancements over the regular bartons --aside from lower power consumption? What I mean by this is that at the same clock speed is a Mobile Barton any faster than a regular Barton? AMD doesn't seem to have any data sheets on the mobile bartons that I can see. -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Question when will the mobile versions be locked? Can AMD lock them also, and if so have any been reported locked yet? I'm trying to get one at the end of the month but that may be too late ;-(. Thanks "BigBadger" == BigBadger writes: BigBadger No, there are no performance advantages when running at BigBadger the same speed. The main advantage the mobile has is that BigBadger it's unlocked. I've found that the latest desktop cpu's BigBadger (week 10 / 2004) overclock just as well as the mobile and BigBadger at the same voltage...but the desktop version is locked. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Question when will the mobile versions be locked? Can AMD lock them
also, and if so have any been reported locked yet? I'm trying to get one at the end of the month but that may be too late They probably won't ever be locked. The fact that they're unlocked is what lets the notebooks slow the speed of the processer when less performance is needed. steve |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Wolfe wrote:
Question when will the mobile versions be locked? Can AMD lock them also, and if so have any been reported locked yet? I'm trying to get one at the end of the month but that may be too late They probably won't ever be locked. The fact that they're unlocked is what lets the notebooks slow the speed of the processer when less performance is needed. Sort of correct The L3 bridges can easily be locked (ie: no multiplier changing with NF1 or NF2 boards) without affecting the PowerNow functionality. I've made several posts on this in the past, my favourite being: http://www.google.co.nz/groups?hl=en...21726%40ne ws ..xtra.co.nz -- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"BigBadger" wrote in message
... [snip] I've found that the latest desktop cpu's (week 10 / 2004) overclock just as well as the mobile and at the same voltage Is that correct? I can believe the "top end" might be the same. But what about at lower voltages? I have only had 2 mobile 2500's, so I am not an expert, but both of them were a little disappointing in terms of top-end performance (both would only go to around 2450MHz Prime95 stable). But on the other hand, they do seem to need less volts than other Bartons I have tried. For example I am running my current CPU at 2400MHz at 1.65v. I wouldn't have thought you could do that with most desktop Bartons. My 3200+ needed 1.75v to do 2310MHz and 1.85v to manage 2400MHz. Chip |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Question when will the mobile versions be locked? Can AMD lock them
also, and if so have any been reported locked yet? I'm trying to get one at the end of the month but that may be too late They probably won't ever be locked. The fact that they're unlocked is what lets the notebooks slow the speed of the processer when less performance is needed. The highest possible multiplier is locked AFAIR. So you just can underclock. Opening the L6 bridges allows Ocerclocking, but fiddling wiht the CPU means you just can go for a non mobile and mod it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Josef Varela" wrote in message ... Question when will the mobile versions be locked? Can AMD lock them also, and if so have any been reported locked yet? I'm trying to get one at the end of the month but that may be too late They probably won't ever be locked. The fact that they're unlocked is what lets the notebooks slow the speed of the processer when less performance is needed. The highest possible multiplier is locked AFAIR. So you just can underclock. Opening the L6 bridges allows Ocerclocking, but fiddling wiht the CPU means you just can go for a non mobile and mod it. I don't understand what you are trying to say. My mobile is unlocked and my motherboard allows me to set any multiplier I like. 5x, 22x... whatever. Chip |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
-- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Chip" wrote in message ... "BigBadger" wrote in message ... [snip] I've found that the latest desktop cpu's (week 10 / 2004) overclock just as well as the mobile and at the same voltage Is that correct? I can believe the "top end" might be the same. But what about at lower voltages? I have only had 2 mobile 2500's, so I am not an expert, but both of them were a little disappointing in terms of top-end performance (both would only go to around 2450MHz Prime95 stable). But on the other hand, they do seem to need less volts than other Bartons I have tried. For example I am running my current CPU at 2400MHz at 1.65v. I wouldn't have thought you could do that with most desktop Bartons. My 3200+ needed 1.75v to do 2310MHz and 1.85v to manage 2400MHz. Chip Desktop and Mobile Bartons are basically the same chips... the difference is that the Mobiles are tested at lower voltage...there is nothing to say that the desktops definitely won't work at the same low voltage. I found that a week 10 / 2004 desktop needed about the same volts for any given speed as my week 52 / 2003 Mobile.....Maybe the CPU I got was exceptional? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My mobile is unlocked and my motherboard allows me to set any multiplier I
like. 5x, 22x... whatever. That means you L6 bridges are all open |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mobile 2500 barton what ram to use ? | Dennis E Strausser Jr | Overclocking | 7 | June 22nd 04 07:59 PM |
** does mobile Barton take same HSFs and waterblocks as non-mobile version ??? ** | no-name | Overclocking | 3 | May 21st 04 05:09 PM |
Mobile Barton XP2500 configuration on A78N8X-E Deluxe | The Old Man | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | April 15th 04 01:08 PM |
Athlon XP 2100+ to mobile 2600+ worth the upgrage? | yuki | Overclocking AMD Processors | 15 | April 13th 04 02:21 PM |
Mobile Barton 2500 Unlocked ? | Jim Reynolds | Overclocking AMD Processors | 2 | March 31st 04 07:06 AM |