If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Help with fitting 3rd hard drive on A7V8X please
To start with I am not exactly inexperienced as I have built four PC's
using Asus boards, but I have only ever fitted two hard drives and have never entered the realms of learning about SCCI or Raid whatever. I am OK with fitting simple IDE hard drives and that is where my experience ends. I needed a third drive on my A7V8X so bought a PCI controller card (non raid version) fitted that with its software and XP recognises it. I tried to run my current two hard drives off its primary connection and they would get recognised on boot up. I put them both back direct off the motherboard and put the new drive (as master) running off the new controller card and that works OK and I can use the third drive. Is that the way it should be? I thought all three might run off the new controller? The other strange thing (to me at least) was that when I used IBM set up disk, it recognised the new hard drive (running off the controller) as a SCCI drive - is that right? XP then formatted it OK and it works, so I suppose everything is OK. The only strange thing is that if I check "My Computer" all the disks display after a while (the serhlight comes on which it never used to), and if I try to change the drive (to write to) in another programme, it takes about 30 seconds to display all the drives available - which seems a very long time? Any input greatly received, hope this is the right group to ask in? Regards, -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
An add-on PC card that is used for the interface for IDE hard drives is
referred to as pseudo-scsi. Little secret. The more controllers added, and hard drives added to those controllers, the longer it will take to INITIALLY take windows explorer to account for the contents of those drives. Once accounted for, there should not be a time delay access problem. This is typical of 95/98/ME/NT systems. If during bootup, if provided time before logging in, Win2K/XP will do this as part of the bootup process. So, there will be no delay in XP under that condition. If you want to physically see this in XP boot process, you need the following: a LED that lights up when the controller card is accessed.. Have two such LED indicators. One for a SCSI card controlling two hard drives, and one for a Promise controller card controlling two hard drives. Delay logging on when the XP boot screen comes up. XP will, after a moment, access and account for all hard drives. The LEDs will light off when each card accesses its hard drives.. If you don't allow the delay, XP will act similar to 95/98/ME/NT and delay when it accounts for the contents of each hard drive connected to a separate controller card. XP should recognize a hard drive connected by a controller card. You have to install the driver for the controller card first, if XP can't see the physical hard drive. If you're referring to what XP "sees" on the 3rd hard drive in windows explorer, this only shows formatted partition information. The hard drive involved has to have a partition created and formatted. Simply moving a bootable hard drive and another from your onboard ide connection to another controller is not advisable for usage. "Peter" ] wrote in message news:SWWgVtAQrGvAFwBd@nospamwantedherethankyouvery much.com... To start with I am not exactly inexperienced as I have built four PC's using Asus boards, but I have only ever fitted two hard drives and have never entered the realms of learning about SCCI or Raid whatever. I am OK with fitting simple IDE hard drives and that is where my experience ends. I needed a third drive on my A7V8X so bought a PCI controller card (non raid version) fitted that with its software and XP recognises it. I tried to run my current two hard drives off its primary connection and they would get recognised on boot up. I put them both back direct off the motherboard and put the new drive (as master) running off the new controller card and that works OK and I can use the third drive. Is that the way it should be? I thought all three might run off the new controller? The other strange thing (to me at least) was that when I used IBM set up disk, it recognised the new hard drive (running off the controller) as a SCCI drive - is that right? XP then formatted it OK and it works, so I suppose everything is OK. The only strange thing is that if I check "My Computer" all the disks display after a while (the serhlight comes on which it never used to), and if I try to change the drive (to write to) in another programme, it takes about 30 seconds to display all the drives available - which seems a very long time? Any input greatly received, hope this is the right group to ask in? Regards, -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Just my thoughts, I'd have thought it better to have yr primary disk
connected to mobo and any extra disk on the card. If a delay accessing the card connected disk I'd have thought it down to the card controller "Peter" ] wrote in message news:SWWgVtAQrGvAFwBd@nospamwantedherethankyouvery much.com... To start with I am not exactly inexperienced as I have built four PC's using Asus boards, but I have only ever fitted two hard drives and have never entered the realms of learning about SCCI or Raid whatever. I am OK with fitting simple IDE hard drives and that is where my experience ends. I needed a third drive on my A7V8X so bought a PCI controller card (non raid version) fitted that with its software and XP recognises it. I tried to run my current two hard drives off its primary connection and they would get recognised on boot up. I put them both back direct off the motherboard and put the new drive (as master) running off the new controller card and that works OK and I can use the third drive. Is that the way it should be? I thought all three might run off the new controller? The other strange thing (to me at least) was that when I used IBM set up disk, it recognised the new hard drive (running off the controller) as a SCCI drive - is that right? XP then formatted it OK and it works, so I suppose everything is OK. The only strange thing is that if I check "My Computer" all the disks display after a while (the serhlight comes on which it never used to), and if I try to change the drive (to write to) in another programme, it takes about 30 seconds to display all the drives available - which seems a very long time? Any input greatly received, hope this is the right group to ask in? Regards, -- Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Lil' Dave,
You wrote: An add-on PC card that is used for the interface for IDE hard drives is referred to as pseudo-scsi. That is a relief, now I can rest at night :-) Little secret. The more controllers added, and hard drives added to those controllers, the longer it will take to INITIALLY take windows explorer to account for the contents of those drives. Once accounted for, there should not be a time delay access problem. This is typical of 95/98/ME/NT systems. If during bootup, if provided time before logging in, Win2K/XP will do this as part of the bootup process. So, there will be no delay in XP under that condition. There was a huge delay initially (XP) but it now seems to have speeded up somewhat :-) If you want to physically see this in XP boot process, you need the following: a LED that lights up when the controller card is accessed.. Have two such LED indicators. One for a SCSI card controlling two hard drives, and one for a Promise controller card controlling two hard drives. Delay logging on when the XP boot screen comes up. XP will, after a moment, access and account for all hard drives. The LEDs will light off when each card accesses its hard drives.. If you don't allow the delay, XP will act similar to 95/98/ME/NT and delay when it accounts for the contents of each hard drive connected to a separate controller card. Understand now. XP should recognize a hard drive connected by a controller card. You have to install the driver for the controller card first, if XP can't see the physical hard drive. No problems there. If you're referring to what XP "sees" on the 3rd hard drive in windows explorer, this only shows formatted partition information. The hard drive involved has to have a partition created and formatted. All that had been done but it *initially* took a long time to display each icon (with the searchlight showing it was looking for them) but after a couple of reboots, it now displays them instantly, more relief for me :-) Simply moving a bootable hard drive and another from your onboard ide connection to another controller is not advisable for usage. Understood now, many thanks for fully explaining the processes for me. Regards, -- Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hello D,
You wrote: Just my thoughts, I'd have thought it better to have yr primary disk connected to mobo and any extra disk on the card. If a delay accessing the card connected disk I'd have thought it down to the card controller All fine now D, thanks for your input. Regards, -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The cost of Bad Service: Samsung HDD: SP 1614N | dt | General | 10 | December 20th 04 09:54 PM |
Hard Drive, external - cheapest way to go? | Big Mac | General | 8 | May 6th 04 04:56 AM |
two hd's on same IDE channel | Steve James | General | 25 | March 13th 04 12:06 AM |
REPOST: A7V333: no longer able to access hard disks at boot time | Chris Metzler | Asus Motherboards | 6 | January 8th 04 06:29 PM |
P4P800 Dlx W2K new SATA? | Ken Fox | Asus Motherboards | 8 | January 7th 04 02:45 PM |