If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak re-enters inkjet biz
There is a term for that belief, you know, Megalomania (if you aren't
familiar with it, I'm sure Google can help). ;-) Art DRS wrote: "Arthur Entlich" wrote in message news:9BYEh.1138252$1T2.1033511@pd7urf2no DRS wrote: [...] This is not a private email. This is Usenet. It is a public forum and everything you post can be read by anybody and everybody, so if you top-post because one person likes it that way you are screwing everybody else. [...] Oh, but I love self-righteous indignation. Are you so sure you speak for "everybody else"? Yes. |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak re-enters inkjet biz
Mostly Harmless. ;-)
Art DRS wrote: "Frank" wrote in message DRS wrote: "Arthur Entlich" wrote in message news:9BYEh.1138252$1T2.1033511@pd7urf2no [...] Oh, but I love self-righteous indignation. Are you so sure you speak for "everybody else"? Yes. Um mm...sorry pal but you don't speak for me! You speak only for yourself. The standards speak for everybody. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak re-enters inkjet biz
"Arthur Entlich" wrote in message
news:EDdFh.1163870$1T2.20315@pd7urf2no DRS wrote: [...] Oh, but I love self-righteous indignation. Are you so sure you speak for "everybody else"? Yes. There is a term for that belief, you know, Megalomania (if you aren't familiar with it, I'm sure Google can help). ;-) Actually, the term is "logic". Top-posting destroys the logical flow for everybody. Thus, when I ask top-posters to desist and adhere to the standards, I am (as would anybody making the request) speaking on behalf of everybody. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak re-enters inkjet biz
DRS - You do get an "A+" for persistance, as does Measekite. Both of you,
however, also get an "A+" for foolishness. You've both made your point, a few people post an agreement, but most find your behaviour obsessive ("I speak on behalf of everybody" - quote attributed to DRS). Get over it, suck it up, and move on already! (top and bottom posted - take your choice.) "DRS" wrote in message ... "Arthur Entlich" wrote in message news:EDdFh.1163870$1T2.20315@pd7urf2no DRS wrote: [...] Oh, but I love self-righteous indignation. Are you so sure you speak for "everybody else"? Yes. There is a term for that belief, you know, Megalomania (if you aren't familiar with it, I'm sure Google can help). ;-) Actually, the term is "logic". Top-posting destroys the logical flow for everybody. Thus, when I ask top-posters to desist and adhere to the standards, I am (as would anybody making the request) speaking on behalf of everybody. You do get an "A+" for persistance, as does Measekite. Both of you, however, also get an "A+" for foolishness. You've both made your point, a few people post an agreement, but most find your behaviour obsessive ("I speak on behalf of everybody" - quote attributed to DRS). Get over it, suck it up, and move on already! (top and bottom posted - take your choice.) |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak re-enters inkjet biz
"Burt" wrote in message
t "DRS" wrote in message ... [...] Actually, the term is "logic". Top-posting destroys the logical flow for everybody. Thus, when I ask top-posters to desist and adhere to the standards, I am (as would anybody making the request) speaking on behalf of everybody. You do get an "A+" for persistance, As long as people post on the subject I am entitled to respond. That does not make me obsessive, merely a participant. I do not see you criticising those equally "obsessive" participants who continue to defend top-posting. as does Measekite. Both of you, however, also get an "A+" for foolishness. You've both made your point, a few people post an agreement, but most find your behaviour obsessive ("I speak on behalf of everybody" - quote attributed to DRS). Do put it in context. Get over it, suck it up, and move on already! (top and bottom posted - take your choice.) Unfortunately you remove that choice by top-posting. We still have to get past your top-post to get to the uneditted cited material. |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak re-enters inkjet biz
DRS wrote: "Burt" wrote in message t "DRS" wrote in message ... [...] Actually, the term is "logic". Top-posting destroys the logical flow for everybody. Thus, when I ask top-posters to desist and adhere to the standards, I am (as would anybody making the request) speaking on behalf of everybody. You do get an "A+" for persistance, As long as people post on the subject I am entitled to respond. oH yEAH Furtie He is entitled to respond even though I think Top Posting is better along with inline posting. That does not make me obsessive, merely a participant. The church would like to shut you up. Personally I do not agree with you only your right to say what you want. I do not see you criticising those equally "obsessive" participants who continue to defend top-posting. as does Measekite. Both of you, however, also get an "A+" for foolishness. You've both made your point, a few people post an agreement, but most find your behaviour obsessive ("I speak on behalf of everybody" - quote attributed to DRS). Do put it in context. Get over it, suck it up, and move on already! (top and bottom posted - take your choice.) Unfortunately you remove that choice by top-posting. We still have to get past your top-post to get to the uneditted cited material. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Epson Clossy vs. Kodak Ultima paper | george | Printers | 4 | October 12th 06 10:07 PM |
Best off-brandname Inkjet Refill Kit | Roland Marsey | Printers | 17 | August 2nd 04 01:20 AM |
Kodak Soft Gloss Picture Paper for inkjet printers | Ray K | Printers | 14 | May 28th 04 01:55 PM |
kodak inkjet? news | Printers | 2 | October 22nd 03 01:51 AM | |
kodak inkjet? news | Printers | 0 | October 22nd 03 01:21 AM |