If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3dmark scores pathetically low?
I could not submit my results to Futuremark's online browser
Most likely because Nvidia drivers cheat up the wazoo, and Futuremark has banned all older drivers. You also need the latest 3dmark patch. BTW, the 5600 is a lousy card. Your score is about right! haha! rms |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"rms" wrote in message . com... I could not submit my results to Futuremark's online browser Most likely because Nvidia drivers cheat up the wazoo, and Futuremark has banned all older drivers. You also need the latest 3dmark patch. BTW, the 5600 is a lousy card. Your score is about right! haha! rms Anyone else have anything useful to add? Pearlf |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi
As a reference, I have a P4 2.8C, 512MB PC3200 RAM, Radeon 9800np. I just up the vid card speeds by 10/15MHz, flick off HT and I get 6000+. You should easily get 3000+ with your system, but your vid card might let you down. Better video card with less memory might have equalised things better. Peter Cavan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.542 / Virus Database: 336 - Release Date: 18/11/2003 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
do you gain by disabling hyperthreading??
"Peter Cavan" wrote in message ... Hi As a reference, I have a P4 2.8C, 512MB PC3200 RAM, Radeon 9800np. I just up the vid card speeds by 10/15MHz, flick off HT and I get 6000+. You should easily get 3000+ with your system, but your vid card might let you down. Better video card with less memory might have equalised things better. Peter Cavan --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.542 / Virus Database: 336 - Release Date: 18/11/2003 -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
do you gain by disabling hyperthreading??
I could be wrong, but I believe 3dmark doesn't use hyperthreading. Therefore you should disable it for the benchmark. Aquamark3 otoh, does use ht, and it should be enabled. rms |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Strontium" wrote in message ... - Fredericks stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "rms" wrote in message . com... I could not submit my results to Futuremark's online browser Most likely because Nvidia drivers cheat up the wazoo, and Futuremark has banned all older drivers. You also need the latest 3dmark patch. BTW, the 5600 is a lousy card. Your score is about right! haha! rms Anyone else have anything useful to add? Yeah. Get a 9800pro. snip My original intention with this thread was to get an idea of what is an acceptable score given my hardware and what is not. If I had the budget to afford a Radeon 9800 Pro (just over ZAR5000, pretty much an entire month's salary for the mid-class patron on the better side of the fence in South Africa), course I'd get one. Pearlf Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Strontium wrote:
- Fredericks stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... - Fredericks stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "rms" wrote in message . com... I could not submit my results to Futuremark's online browser Most likely because Nvidia drivers cheat up the wazoo, and Futuremark has banned all older drivers. You also need the latest 3dmark patch. BTW, the 5600 is a lousy card. Your score is about right! haha! rms Anyone else have anything useful to add? Yeah. Get a 9800pro. snip My original intention with this thread was to get an idea of what is an acceptable score given my hardware and what is not. If I had the budget to afford a Radeon 9800 Pro (just over ZAR5000, pretty much an entire month's salary for the mid-class patron on the better side of the fence in South Africa), course I'd get one. Well, the hardware you have seems decent enough. I wouldn't use 3DMark as a gauge (that's more of a ****ing contest for people that CAN afford 9800pro's, like me next week!). Instead, use real games and/or apps that you actually use and decide if the performance is acceptable to you. Good call Strontium, I was about to write something along similar lines. If the machine does what you want it to do then forget about the benchmarks. They are sometimes useful for tweaking/comparing hardware after changes but are mainly used for bragging. My machine (XP2200+/512MB/GF4ti4200/128MB) returns miserable scores running 3DMark '03 but is more than adequate for the gaming I do. -- ~misfit~ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Socket 939 being reported by 3DMark 2001 version 200 | Wayne @ W. | AMD x86-64 Processors | 1 | May 13th 04 02:08 AM |
My 3DMark 2003 results | crapbottom | Overclocking | 14 | November 13th 03 08:00 AM |