Weak 3dmark 2k3

Right the CPu has NOTHING to do with it, your a STUPID INBREED ****ER.


On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

are you stupid?

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:50:28 GMT, "LeeB18509"
wrote:


"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.


It's the card.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

It'll run you about $500...and not much else.

exacly.


after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

Not likely. Instead you should derail your one track mind and come on over
to the dark (light) side.

yeah, when those $300 9800 pro's drop to $100 ....or $76 like this
card was, i'm not going to spend 300 bucks to game all day online...
anyhow ill have to run the benchmark again, as i've got it clocked now
close to TI4800 levels... and stable in madden 2k4, nba live 2k3,
THPS4

Try it with an Athlon 64 and that GF4 ti2400.

See how much a diff it would be.




On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

are you stupid?

Even with an Xp 2400 he would double that score.



On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

are you stupid?

I think that you have got the idea that the 'issue' is the card / Direct X
9.
If it is any consolation the list is not long and endless of games that
require Direct X9 to run or use it for enhanced graphics.
3D Mark 2003 does, as yet, seems to be the only consolation that the top end
cards of ATI and NVidia have got for themselves, apart from the Aquathingy,
to really push the hardware. And now that it seems HL2 has been delayed
there postones some peoples gratification for upgrading their machines with
those powerful cards.

Don't place as much emphasis on just a benchmark that really is weighted
towards you 'needing' a new card - go to 3D Mark 2001 which tends to be
representative of todays games. Or better still just play the games that you
have got and enjoy them

--
Regards

Morgan

you must be stupid.


"We Live For The One We Die For The One"
wrote in message ...

Even with an Xp 2400 he would double that score.



On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

are you stupid?

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:50:28 GMT, "LeeB18509"
wrote:


"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.


It's the card.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

It'll run you about $500...and not much else.

exacly.


after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

Not likely. Instead you should derail your one track mind and come on
over
to the dark (light) side.

yeah, when those $300 9800 pro's drop to $100 ....or $76 like this
card was, i'm not going to spend 300 bucks to game all day online...
anyhow ill have to run the benchmark again, as i've got it clocked now
close to TI4800 levels... and stable in madden 2k4, nba live 2k3,
THPS4

I have to ask again. Are you stupid?

i knew there wasn't much oxygen in the environment down under

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:02:01 +1000, "Aussie"
wrote:

So u R...........
"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:38:33 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

are you stupid?

if you and i are joined at the head then yes, otherwise no.

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:43:12 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:50:28 GMT, "LeeB18509"
wrote:


"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.


It's the card.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

It'll run you about $500...and not much else.

exacly.


after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

Not likely. Instead you should derail your one track mind and come on
over
to the dark (light) side.

yeah, when those $300 9800 pro's drop to $100 ....or $76 like this
card was, i'm not going to spend 300 bucks to game all day online...
anyhow ill have to run the benchmark again, as i've got it clocked now
close to TI4800 levels... and stable in madden 2k4, nba live 2k3,
THPS4

I have to ask again. Are you stupid?


i don't know, i get 4920 now...maybe you should tell me how stupid you
are? or do I have to ask again?

what is a child's bedtime down under? i have a funny feeling mommy
doesn't know your using her pc in the wee hours of the night son...


On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:09:06 +1000, "Aussie"
wrote:

Yeah ,,keep trying DICKHEAD... One of these days u'll ****ing learn..But
it'll be toooo late...And u will pay $300 if u lucky to get one of , u know
what....Little knowladge is always been dangerous , to me you r a blazing
****ing gun...


"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:50:28 GMT, "LeeB18509"
wrote:


"Steve Vai" wrote in message
.. .
finally upgraded my vid card to a ti4200, but it's pretty damn weak!
either something is seriously amiss with my system or the card blows,
i'd like to think it's my system.


It's the card.

system: T-bred A @ 1800mhz
768meg ram on 150mhz fsb
soyo dragon platinum kt333
WD 80 gig, 200 gig
MSI Geforce4 TI4200 64meg not OC'd yet (was running geforce2 mx400
64meg)
sb live value
using onboard nic
-------------------
3Dmark 2003
sco 1757
wings of fury: 116.6 FPS
battle of proxycon: 10.8FPS (wtf?)
trolls lair: 10.8FPS (again wtf?)
cpu test 1: 41.4 fps
cpu test 2: 8.0 fps
fill rate single texturing: 674.3 m/texels
multi-texturing: 1736 m/texels
vertex shader: 5.1 fps
ragtroll: 5.9 fps (triple wtf?)

didnt run sound tests... is this about right? i'm starting to wonder
what the fx5900 ultra would run.

It'll run you about $500...and not much else.

exacly.


after oc'ing it to 300/590 i got 1965, this is all at 800x600.
hopefully the barton will kick it in the ass

Not likely. Instead you should derail your one track mind and come on
over
to the dark (light) side.

yeah, when those $300 9800 pro's drop to $100 ....or $76 like this
card was, i'm not going to spend 300 bucks to game all day online...
anyhow ill have to run the benchmark again, as i've got it clocked now
close to TI4800 levels... and stable in madden 2k4, nba live 2k3,
THPS4