If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Christopher Rawlison wrote:
Michael Brown wrote: rms wrote: I wouldn't bother. They're meant to "prevent" the core from being crushed due to too much pressure from the heatsink. You are neglecting the potential additional heat transfer of cpu heat from the substrate to the heatsink with a copper shim. Actually, it's the reverse. The substrate has a much higher thermal resistance compared to copper (or aluminium), so at any particular point on the substrate, the HSF surface above it has a higher temperature. So you'd actually be dumping heat back into the substrate, though in any case there isn't much conduction/convection away from the substrate, so there would be a negligible performance difference. Actually, a shim does NOTHING for thermal transfer. Think about it this way: when was the last time you felt the actual ceramic base on a chip? It stays comparatively cool. First of all, it's not ceramic. Ceramic went out with the Thunderbirds and early Palominos. The current XP's are on an "organic" substrate, whatever that means. The substrate on my XP2500's does get noticably warm after it's been on for a while. Secondly, the substrate has a high thermal resistance, so could be called a thermal insulator (a thermal insulator is anything with a high thermal resistance, and a conductor is one with a low resistance, high and low being rather subjective). This does not mean that it won't heat up. All it means is that heat will not flow through the material quickly, in the same sense as current flowing. In the electrical sense, you can have a device with a high resistance (thermal resistance) but also have it at a high potential voltage (temperature). As long as there is a low heat loss through conduction and convection, the substrate will heat up. This is why socket sensors report a somewhat accurate temperature. However, this high thermal resistance means the heat-carrying capability of the substrate is quite low, which is why there is (or should be) a negligible temperature increase/decrease compared to not using a shim. [...] Also you should be careful about putting any type of thermal interface material on a shim that is conductive for the simple fact that XPs have bridges on the ceramic that could get shorted by the TIM. That's what a drill press is for Seriously though, modifying a shim is not recommended as it's very easy to warp it, which leads to bad die-hsf contact. I beleive there's pre-machined copper shims for the new XPs that have holes around the bridges, so as long as you're careful with the goop (and ideally use silicon goop) there shouldn't be any problems. -- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
You have to be careful ordering shims, as XP shims are different from Barton
shims. I believe I got my copper shim from www.1coolpc.com rms |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
rms wrote:
You have to be careful ordering shims, as XP shims are different from Barton shims. I believe I got my copper shim from www.1coolpc.com Bartons are XPs Perhaps you mean the difference between ThunderBird/Palamino/ThoroughBred/Barton Ben -- A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups. I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
You have to be careful ordering shims, as XP shims are different from
Barton shims. I believe I got my copper shim from www.1coolpc.com Bartons are XPs Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Barton cores larger than XPs, primarily because of the increased cache. rms |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
rms wrote:
You have to be careful ordering shims, as XP shims are different from Barton shims. I believe I got my copper shim from www.1coolpc.com Bartons are XPs Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Barton cores larger than XPs, primarily because of the increased cache. Bartons ARE XPs!!! The Bartons are bigger than the Thoroughbreds due to increased cache. The Thoroughbreds are also XPs. Ben -- A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups. I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone know a good deal on a good mp3 player? | travel | General | 1 | November 30th 04 10:51 PM |
Which Wireless Option Is Good For Streaming Video? | Jay Chan | General | 0 | October 21st 04 04:32 PM |
Are cpu shims worth using? | Jim | General | 4 | April 11th 04 04:10 PM |
Help me pick out a good mobo to use with XP 2800+ | Ben in TN | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | February 7th 04 11:25 AM |
Good 2500+ ? | Thomas Andersson | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | July 21st 03 04:10 PM |