View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 29th 06, 10:41 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
First of One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 462
Default eVGA 7950 GT KO SC vs. 7950 GT KO

The difference will be between 0% and 7%, depending on whether the game is
limited by memory bandwidth or by shader processing.

Would you pay $25 more to play a game at 32 fps instead of 30 fps?

--
"War is the continuation of politics by other means.
It can therefore be said that politics is war without
bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."


"HockeyTownUSA" wrote in message
...
I know the difference between the 7950 GT KO Superclocked an GT KO are
basically 40MHz in the GPU speed. But does this make a whole lot of
difference. But there is only a $25 difference between the two if you check
online stores for best prices. But why spend an extra $25 if there is
negligible difference. I don't care to mod, overclock, or revise BIOS if
not necessary, just want a solid performing 512MB video card.

I am replacing my 7900 GT KO SC with a 7950 only because I am building
another PC for someone else, and they said it would be fine if I used my
7900 GT that is being used in my current machine. I figured if I have to
buy a video card anyways, he can get a discount, and I can get something a
little better. Plus it seems games these days are beginning to like 512MB.