"PAS" ntotrr optonline.net wrote:

"John Doe" always.look message.header wrote
"PAS" ntotrr optonline.net wrote:
"John Doe" always.look message.header wrote
"PAS" ntotrr optonline.net wrote:
John Doe wrote:

In a 9-0 decision, the winner is... Privacy!

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...2014.html?_r=1

There is a difference between what they are permitted to do
and what they actually do. The "climate" of law enforcement
has changed. Citizens are viewed as suspicious and we are
treated that way. The police are supposed to protect and
serve the public, they do neither. The courts have ruled that
they are not obligated to protect us.

Citations please...

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/po...otus.html?_r=0

Because the title of the article is "Police Do Not Have a
Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone", you believe that it's
true? In the ruling, where does it say that? In the article,
according to a prior ruling "social service workers [do not have
the constitutional duty] to protect a young boy from a beating by
his father". And apparently that precedent was upheld.

My interest is the judicial, not your personal problems with the
police. You can find lots of fellow whiners on YouTube if you want
to continue whining about police mistreatment. It's got to be the
most whined about subject on the Internet.

I made a statement and you asked for a citation of it.

Still waiting...

What I stated was true

According to an article title, not a court ruling.

yet you want to argue the point, just as I knew you would.

When you spread BS, expect to be argued with.

There's no point in discussing anything further with you.

You're a girl, right? Many females whine about police brutality
except when it comes to the police beating up on their male
counterparts...










--

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.albasani. net!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "PAS" ntotrr optonline.net
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.windows7.general
Subject: OT Should the police search your smartphone/tablet?
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:58:56 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 40
Message-ID: lojpqd$g36$1 speranza.aioe.org
References: ll5tss$lr2$2 dont-email.me loftrv$36q$1 dont-email.me logfhm$k47$1 dont-email.me loh7oq$3j0$1 speranza.aioe.org lohknv$3t0$1 dont-email.me lohpsk$ohs$1 speranza.aioe.org loi012$qmd$1 dont-email.me
NNTP-Posting-Host: IDZA8Fot3QCrC0IFDB55Pw.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse aioe.org
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:30612 alt.windows7.general:103004