"Rob Stow" wrote in message
...
Homie wrote:

Bottom posting corrected (most people start reading at the top of a
page, it aint 1987
anymore, welcome to the 21st century).
" Intel is so far behind AMD these days "
Where do people come up with such bull****?

Perhaps because an AMD64 processor outperforms and uses a lot
less power than a P4 or Xeon that is clocked 50% faster ?

So let me see here, you're comparing a 32/64bit processor against two 32bit
processors? Why the hell didn't you compare the Athlon XP which has *much*
more relavence?

And since when did the clock speed have any relavence nowadays...sure, its
clocked 50% slower or whatever, but do you see AMD releasing CPUs with 3GHz
clock speeds? Didn't think so.