On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:35:19 +1300, "~misfit~"
wrote:

cowboyz wrote:
"~misfit~" wrote in message
...


My GF4 ti4200 with a CPU running at 2.1 GHz gets 12,000.

My g/f's FX5200 with a CPU at 2.2 GHz and twice the L2 of mine gets
2,500.

While the CPU does have an influence on the 3DMark score it isn't
anywhere near as significant as the GPU.
--
~misfit~



surely these figures are a typo. 2500? or is that 12500?

Sorry, it was a mistake. The 2,500 (2,433 actually) was what she got with
her old GF2MX400/64. With the FX5200/128 she still only gets 5,585 though. I
must read my records more carefully. :-). That's on a 2500+ Barton clocked
to 3200+ speed (200MHz FSB) with 512MB RAM.

Thats about right...

GF2s are in the 2500 range... GF3s are in the 5000~7000s...

(I'm a bit 'anal' I guess the Americans would say, I rigorously benchmark
and record every build or change I make for future reference).

Many of us do and should... so we know what were getting.


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!